Rule of 40 for stock selection March 24, 2021
What is it: Rule of 40 is the idea that revenue growth rates plus profitability margins should be equal to or greater than 40%. Venture capitalists came up with this simple method to decide whether or not to invest in young software start-ups. It is a rule-of-thumb for sizing up the health of a software business, by taking into consideration two of their most important metrics: growth and profitability.1
Rationale: The growth and profitability of a company are usually at odds with each other. To drive growth, the company would need to incur expenses. Finding the right mix or balance between the two can be tricky. Rule of 40 tries to balance and provide a trade-off between them. Investors are usually willing to tolerate low profits or even losses as long as a company is demonstrating strong growth.2
How to calculate: Take the example of Company A whose revenue is growing at 20%. According to the Rule of 40, it should be generating an EBITDA – earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation – margin of at least 20%. Add the two numbers together. The higher the total number above 40%, the more attractive the company is for investment. A score above 40 is considered a passing grade while a score below 40 means failing the test.3
Why use EBITDA? Every company’s capital and entity structures are different. So is the way they apply accounting standards to the capitalisation of their fixed or intangible assets.
EBITDA helps investors compare apple-for-apple by stripping out interest from debt, differences in taxation and accounting policies across companies.4
Application: The criterion was initially used as a quick health check for software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies. Its application, however, has extended to most software companies. Young companies which are usually loss-making will have to beat the 40% mark with higher revenue growth. Older mature companies, whose growth has usually tapered off, will have to focus on improving their profit margins to meet the 40% mark.
Limitations: Implementing Rule of 40 across a short timespan may yield unreliable results. This is because consistent strong performances are difficult to maintain. It is important to measure performance across multiple years to derive a more accurate representation. In a Bain & Company research of 86 companies from 2013 to 2017, just 25% outperformed the Rule of 40 for three or more years. Only 17% outperformed in all five years.5
How you can use it: You can use the Rule of 40 as a stock-selection criterion for high-growth companies. These companies tend to spend heavily on sales, marketing and research and development to spur their revenue growth. Rule of 40 helps you sift out companies that are not yet profitable but offer strong revenue growth prospects. Today, many investors use it to assess any fast-growing digital-economy company.6
Please feel free to email us at firstname.lastname@example.org if you have questions about applying Rule of 40 to your stock selections.
These commentaries are intended for general circulation. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person who may receive this document. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of the units and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. Investors may wish to seek advice from a financial adviser before investing. In the event that investors choose not to seek advice from a financial adviser, they should consider whether the investment is suitable for them.
The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries.
Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned.