Mid-cap value funds

Investment in the stock market involves adequate knowledge about the available options for effectively balancing risk and returns. Among the various options that exist, mid-cap value funds are prominent because they can combine the growth potential of mid-cap companies with the stability provided by undervalued assets. These funds are mid-capitalisation-oriented. The guide gives an in-depth overview of mid-cap value funds and is helpful for readers at a beginner level to understand how such funds work, as well as their benefits, risks, and performance.

Table of Contents

What are Mid-Cap Value Funds?
Understanding Mid-Cap Value Funds
Performance Metrics of Mid-Cap Value Funds
Fund Management of Mid-Cap Value Funds
Examples of Mid-Cap Value Funds
Frequently Asked Questions

What are Mid-Cap Value Funds?

Mid-cap value funds are a particular type of mutual or exchange-traded fund (ETF) that invests in mid-capitalisation companies perceived as undervalued. Mid-cap companies are usually ranked between 101 and 250 regarding market capitalization. These firms have high growth potential but are currently underpriced relative to their intrinsic value.

Through investments in mid-cap value funds, the investor expects to leverage the play between growth opportunities and comparative stability. Therefore, this type of investment is one of the best that investors looking for portfolio diversification can make, but it cannot withstand the increased risks attributed to small-cap stocks.

Understanding Mid-Cap Value Funds

Mid-cap value funds are a great middle option for investors who want to enjoy more growth potential than large-cap funds but do not want to experience the fluctuations of small-cap funds. They provide a diversified approach by targeting companies that are not only undervalued by the market but also have strong fundamentals and ample scope for future growth.

Key Characteristics

Mid-cap value funds stand out in the investment landscape due to the following unique characteristics:

Market Capitalisation Range: This fund caters to mid-cap companies with market capitalisations between US$2 billion and US$10 billion.

Investment Strategy: This type of fund focuses on companies considered undervalued by some measure, such as P/E or P/B.

Risk Profile: It is slightly more risk-prone than small-cap funds but still less volatile than large-cap funds.

Growth Potential: Mid-cap firms tend to have more significant growth potential than large-cap stocks; however, they are not nearly as stable.

Investment Mechanics

Mid-cap value funds usually invest at least 65% of their portfolio in mid-cap equity. The companies must represent the following characteristics:

Economic Health: Companies have low debt, strong cash flow, and good earning reports.

Future Growth Prospect: Organisations in growth-friendly industries or markets.

Attractive Valuations: Stocks that are selling at a discount to financials.

Proven Business Models: Companies with consistent operations and market presence.

Performance Metrics of Mid-Cap Value Funds

Mid-cap value funds have shown great long-term performance compared to other funds. They have managed to deliver:

5-Year Average Returns: 8–10% per annum.

3-Year Average Returns: Usually over 20% when the market is in good form.

1-Year Returns: About 11% as per the market trends.

Risk and Volatility

Though the potential returns of mid-cap value funds are pretty attractive, they come with specific risks:

Market Volatility: Mid-cap stocks may have sharp price movements during economic downturns or corrections.
Liquidity Concerns: Mid-cap stocks have relatively lower trading volumes than their large-cap counterparts, affecting liquidity.
Economic Sensitivity: These funds are sensitive to macroeconomic factors like interest rates and inflation.

Investors must maintain a long-term outlook to overcome short-term volatility and reap maximum returns.

Fund Management of Mid-Cap Value Funds

Management of mid-cap value funds depends on their performance and compliance with investor objectives. Active and passive management are among the most popular fund management strategies.

Active Management

Active management is a ‘hands-on’ approach in which fund managers actively seek out, select, and change the fund’s portfolio according to market conditions and stock performance.

Stock selection: In active management, the fund manager uses intensive research and analysis to discover companies with low P/E ratios and strong cash flows that are undervalued by the markets.
Dynamic Adjustments: Periodic portfolio adjustments to changes in market trends, economy, or company-based events.
Flexibility: With scope for nimble manoeuvres whenever opportunities seem to materialise, thus making a particular fund sometimes perform better than the indexes in benign time.
Greater costs: Greater research activity combined with trade execution can lead to bigger management expenses, leading to slightly lower bottom lines.

Passive Management

Passive management relies on matching the performance of a specific index, such as the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index.

Index Tracking: Passive mutual funds are tailored to correspond to the indices they replicate by holding stock portfolios exactly in a proportion similar to their index.
Lower Expense Ratios: Since passive funds do not require extensive research or active trading, their management fees are significantly lower and, hence, more cost-effective for investors.
Market-Aligned Returns: Passive funds seldom outperform the market but provide steady returns closely aligned with their benchmark indices.
Simplicity: This strategy is most appropriate for investors who like a simple, hands-off investment.

Selection Criteria for Fund Managers

Irrespective of the type of management, effective mid-cap value funds require managers who have experience and determine the investment based on multiple fundamental factors:

Financial Power Strength: The manager will conduct debt-to-equity ratios, earnings growth, and cash flow analyses in financially strong developing firms.
Growth Potential: The firm’s future growth potential would be measured by the manager’s understanding of industry trends, technological improvement, and market demand.
Valuation Metrics: Managers seek undervalued companies with low P/E and P/B to buy at a discount and enjoy the ride as the valuations will increase.
Sector Diversification: The fund is structured to consist of stocks from multiple industries, reducing sector-related risks.
Quality of Management: The management team’s ability, in terms of their past performance and strategic vision, is a significant factor influencing investment decisions.

Examples of Mid-Cap Value Funds

US Market Examples

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV)

Description: It provides access to the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, focusing on middle-cap companies with an efficient foundation.

Performance: Returns 8.39% per annum over 5 years.

Expense ratio: 0.15%

Advantages: A portfolio that is diversified over the sectors and a good option for long-term investors

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV)

Overview: Exposes investors to mid-cap companies that are undervalued on market metrics.

Performance: It has delivered strong historical returns, with a 10-year excess return of about 1.3 percentage points above the peer average.

Strengths: The portfolio is well structured, balancing risk and growth.

Singapore Market Example

For investors in Singapore, mid-cap value funds may not be as readily available, but ETFs or unit trusts tracking mid-cap indices are available for similar exposure. Tools like the POEMS platform allow access to international mid-cap funds, including US-based funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Impact of Corporate Actions on Mid-Cap Value Funds?

Corporate actions such as mergers, acquisitions, stock splits, or dividend announcements can heavily impact mid-cap value funds. For instance, if an undervalued mid-cap company merges well, the price can rise fast, creating benefits for the fund. In contrast, poor earnings news or management changes can negatively impact the fund’s performance.

What are the Market Trends Affecting Mid-Cap Value Funds?

The current market trends that drive the mid-cap value funds include:

Economic recovery: Potential growth tends to outgrow in recovery phases for mid-cap stocks.

Interest Rate Fluctuations: Increasing interest rates can increase the cost of borrowing for mid-cap companies.

Sector Rotation: During market volatility, investors often shift to value stocks, including mid-cap.

What is the Comparison of Mid-Cap Value Funds to Other Investment Vehicles?

Large-Cap Funds: Mid-cap value funds offer higher growth potential but come with increased volatility.
Small-cap funds: They are stable-growth oriented, while small-cap funds are relatively more volatile.

Growth Funds: Value funds are concerned with undervalued stocks, while growth funds focus on companies with fast earnings growth.

What is the difference between Growth vs. Value in Mid-Cap Stocks?

Growth Stocks:

Companies with above-average growth prospects.

Higher P/E ratios.

Involves innovative industries like technology.

Value Stocks:

Companies are currently undervalued but have sound fundamentals.

Lower P/E and P/B ratios.

Highlight consistent performance and appreciation over the years.

What are Mid-Cap Value Fund Trends and Innovations?

The mid-cap value fund industry is changing due to the acceptance of the following:

Artificial Intelligence: AI is applied to analyse massive data, enabling managers to make informed decisions.

Data Analytics Enhanced: Sophisticated technology helps in better choices for stocks and risk assessment.

Transparency in Strategy: Funds are becoming clear on their strategies for engaging with investors.

Related Terms

Other Terms

Know More about

Margin Trading

Bond Trading

Securities Lending

Supplementary Retirement Scheme

Money Market Funds

REITs ETF

Singapore Stocks

Opening Investment Account

Tools/Educational Resources

Markets Offered by POEMS

Read the Latest Market Journal

Why Invest in Swiss Stocks? A Guide for Singapore Investors

Published on Jul 29, 2026 47

If your portfolio is mostly made up of Singapore blue chips, US tech giants, and a REIT or two, chances are Swiss stocks may not have crossed your mind. Yet Switzerland is home to some of the world’s most established companies, with businesses built on global reach, strong cash flows, resilient balance sheets, and a track record of rewarding shareholders. Think Nestlé. Roche. Novartis. UBS. These are not speculative growth firms or flashy startups chasing the next trend. They are global category leaders that have continued to compound shareholder wealth through wars, recessions, market crashes, and pandemics. For Singapore investors looking to diversify beyond the usual US and domestic markets, Swiss equities offer exposure to defensive sectors, global consumer brands, healthcare innovation, and a market built on stability. In this guide, we will explore why Swiss stocks may deserve a place in a long-term portfolio, what makes the Swiss market unique, and how Singapore investors can start investing in it. What Makes Switzerland Such an Interesting Market? Switzerland punches way above its weight economically. Despite its tiny population, Switzerland is home to a disproportionate number of world-leading multinationals. Its listed companies are leaders in industries such as pharmaceuticals, consumer goods, luxury goods, banking, and industrial technology. Three Swiss companies alone - Nestlé, Roche, and Novartis, are consistently ranked among Europe's largest listed businesses by market capitalisation. So, what makes the Swiss market stand out? Political and economic stability. Switzerland has a long tradition of neutrality, low public debt, and predictable governance. This creates a predictable and resilient investment landscape that appeals to long-term investors. A famously strong currency. The Swiss franc (CHF) has a well-earned reputation as one of the world's premier "safe haven" currencies. During periods of market uncertainty, investors often flock to CHF-denominated assets, potentially providing an additional layer of resilience for international investors. Quality over quantity. Although the Swiss stock market has fewer listed companies than larger exchanges such as the NYSE or London Stock Exchange, many of its businesses generate substantial revenues overseas. Home to strong brands with pricing power, their earnings are driven by worldwide demand rather than the relatively small domestic economy. In fact, the SIX is home to three of the top five most highly capitalised blue-chip companies in all of Europe, and leads the continent outright in sectors like pharma, food products, and life sciences. A genuine innovation hub. Switzerland consistently ranks among the world's most innovative economies, supported by significant investment in research and development across pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and precision engineering. Companies like Roche and Novartis continue to lead on a global scale. It's showing real momentum, not just stability. The benchmark Swiss Market Index has been pushing to record highs in 2026, with monthly trading turnover growing at a healthy clip. Stability and growth aren't mutually exclusive here, that's arguably the whole appeal. The Big Names You'll Come Across You do not need to memorise the entire Swiss Market Index (SMI) to get started, but understanding several of its largest companies provides a useful foundation.: Nestlé (SIX: NESN) Nestlé is the world's largest food and beverage company, with a portfolio spanning coffee, bottled water, infant nutrition, and pet food. It's often held up as the archetypal "defensive" global consumer stock. Roche (SIX: ROG) and Novartis (SIX: NOVN) Two of the largest pharmaceutical companies globally, both heavily invested in oncology, immunology, and cutting-edge biotech. Together with Nestlé, these three names account for a significant proportion of the entire Swiss market's value. UBS Group (SIX: UBSG) UBS is Switzerland's largest bank and one of the world's leading wealth managers, further strengthening its market position following the acquisition of Credit Suisse. Richemont (SIX: CFR) Richemont owns globally recognised luxury brands including Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, providing investors with exposure to the premium luxury goods sector. ABB (SIX: ABBN) and Zurich Insurance (SIX: ZURN) ABB is a global leader in industrial automation and electrification, while Zurich Insurance is one of the world's largest insurance providers. Together, they broaden the sector diversification available within the Swiss market. The common characteristic shared by many Swiss blue-chip companies is that the majority of their revenues are generated outside Switzerland. You're not really betting on the Swiss domestic economy，but you are getting access to global consumer spending, global healthcare demand, and global wealth management, through businesses headquartered in one of the world's most stable economies. The Risks Worth Being Honest About Concentration risk Switzerland's market is dominated by a handful of global champions, including Nestlé, Roche, and Novartis. While these businesses have historically demonstrated resilience, their significant weighting means index performance can be influenced by relatively few companies. Rather than replacing your existing investments, Swiss equities can complement them by adding exposure to resilient, cash-generative businesses in sectors like healthcare, consumer staples, luxury goods, and banking—helping to diversify beyond the technology-heavy US market. Valuation Quality tends to come at a price. Blue-chip names such as Roche, Novartis, and Nestlé have historically traded at premiums due to their resilient earnings and strong competitive advantages. While Swiss equities can be a valuable addition to a diversified portfolio, investors shouldavoid assuming that quality automatically translates into superior future returns, particularly when valuations are already elevated. General market risk Like any equity market, Swiss share prices can decline as well as rise, and past resilience doesn't guarantee future performance. The Bottom Line Although Swiss stocks may not be the flashiest addition to your portfolio, it offers investors exposure to genuinely world-class, globally diversified businesses, wrapped in one of the most stable political and economic environments anywhere. For a Singapore investor already comfortable navigating US and regional markets, adding a modest allocation to Swiss equities is a reasonable way to diversify beyond the usual suspects, without taking on undue risk in the process. Getting started is simple: open an account with us, and you will have direct access to the Swiss market with every trade settled conveniently in SGD. Open an Account Now! Explore Swiss Market Trading For more information, you may visit the POEMS website or you can visit our website or reach out to our Night Desk representatives at 6531 1225. Frequently Asked Questions Is Switzerland a safe market to invest in? Switzerland is widely regarded as one of the more stable markets globally, thanks to its long-standing political neutrality, low public debt, and strict regulatory environment. That said, "stable" refers to the economic and political backdrop, individual share prices still rise and fall like any equity market. Do Swiss stocks pay dividends? Yes, many of Switzerland's largest companies including Nestlé, Roche, and Novartis have long histories of consistent dividend payments. Dividends are subject to a 35% Swiss withholding tax at source, though Singapore-based individual investors are generally entitled to a reduced 15% rate under the Singapore-Switzerland tax treaty. Which Swiss companies are most popular with international investors? Nestlé, Roche, Novartis, and UBS are typically the most widely held Swiss names internationally, given their scale, global revenue base, and long operating histories. Are Swiss stocks only for large or institutional investors? No, Swiss blue chips are accessible to individual retail investors too. The main consideration is understanding sector concentration (heavy in pharma, consumer staples, and luxury) rather than any minimum investment size. What is the main index for Swiss stocks? The Swiss Market Index (SMI) is the primary benchmark, tracking roughly 20 of the largest, most liquid Swiss-listed companies. Broader indices, such as the UBS 100 Index, cover a wider slice of the market for investors seeking more diversification. How do I start investing in Swiss stocks from Singapore? Simply open an account with us. Once your account is set up, you'll have direct access to the Swiss market, with every trade settled conveniently in SGD. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

US-Domiciled ETFs Vs Ireland-Domiciled (UCITS) ETFs: Which Is Better For Singapore Investors?

Published on Jul 24, 2026 196

Why Your Dividend Looks Smaller Than Expected Imagine checking your brokerage account after a dividend payment and noticing that the amount is lower than you expected. It's a common moment of confusion for new ETF investors, and the usual suspects — fund fees or weak performance — are rarely the real cause. In reality, one of the biggest and most overlooked factors is withholding tax, and specifically, where the ETF you hold is domiciled. For Singapore investors building exposure to the S&P 500, the Nasdaq 100, or global equities, understanding ETF domicile can meaningfully improve long-term, after-tax returns, without taking on any additional investment risk. This article looks at what domicile actually means, why Ireland-domiciled funds have become the default choice for so many non-US investors, how the dividend withholding tax math plays out in practice, and where a US-domiciled ETF might still make more sense. What Is ETF Domicile? ETF domicile refers to the country in which a fund is legally registered and regulated. It is a separate question from which market or index the ETF actually tracks — a fund can be domiciled in one country while investing entirely in the stocks of another. Here's a simple illustration using a few common S&P 500 ETFs: ETF Domicile VOO United States IVV United States CSPX Ireland VUAA Ireland Although CSPX and VOO both track the same S&P 500 Index, they are legally structured in different jurisdictions and operate under different regulatory regimes. That difference quietly shapes how dividends are taxed before they reach you, whether dividends are paid out or reinvested automatically and which regulator oversees the fund. Why Ireland-Domiciled ETFs Are Popular With Singapore Investors Same Markets, Different Wrapper Ireland-domiciled ETFs can give exposure to the same underlying markets as their US counterparts, including the S&P 500, the Nasdaq 100, the MSCI World Index, emerging markets, and global bonds. Choosing an Ireland-domiciled fund over a US-domiciled one isn't about giving up market access — you still own, indirectly, the same underlying companies. The difference lies mainly in the legal and tax structure wrapped around that exposure. UCITS: A Recognised Investor-Protection Framework Most Ireland-domiciled ETFs are structured as UCITS funds, short for Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities — a European Union framework that governs how retail investment funds are run. It covers areas such as diversification limits, which prevent a fund from taking outsized exposure to a single issuer; transparency standards that include daily portfolio disclosure for most ETFs; independent custody of fund assets; and oversight by an EU regulator. For Ireland-domiciled funds, this regulator is the Central Bank of Ireland. Because of this, UCITS funds are widely regarded as among the most heavily regulated retail investment products available anywhere in the world. This is part of why they're distributed so widely outside Europe, including across Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. The Real Cost: Dividend Withholding Tax This is usually the single biggest factor in the US-versus-Ireland decision — bigger, in dollar terms, than the small gap in expense ratios that most investors fixate on. How US-Domiciled ETFs Are Taxed When a US-domiciled ETF pays a dividend to a non-US investor, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) withholds tax at source. The default rate is 30%, and this applies in full unless the investor's home country has a tax treaty with the US that lowers it. Singapore does not have such a treaty for individual investors, so Singapore-based holders of US-domiciled ETFs generally face the full 30% rate on US-source dividends. Dividend Received Withholding Tax (30%) Investor Receives US$100 US$30 US$70 How Ireland-Domiciled ETFs Are Taxed US companies held inside an Ireland-domiciled ETF still pay dividends as usual, and the US still withholds tax before that money reaches the fund. But under the US-Ireland double taxation treaty, the rate applied at fund level drops from 30% to 15%. Ireland itself does not generally add additional withholding tax, whether the fund pays that income out or reinvests it. Dividend Received Withholding Tax (15%) Fund Retains US$100 US$15 US$85 Why This Matters More Than the Expense Ratio Many investors compare ETFs purely by expense ratio, often a gap of just 0.03% to 0.07%, or a few basis points. The withholding tax gap, however, is 15 percentage points on every dollar of US-sourced dividend income. This is usually a far bigger drag in absolute terms once a fund has a meaningful yield. Suppose you hold US$50,000 in an S&P 500-tracking ETF yielding around 1.3% a year in dividends, or about US$650 in annual dividend income. On a US-domiciled ETF, withholding tax takes roughly US$195 of that. On an Ireland-domiciled fund, it takes about US$97.50. That's roughly US$97.50 a year staying inside your investment instead of going to the US Treasury — money that, left alone, keeps compounding. Case Study: IVV vs CSPX IVV and CSPX make a useful pair to compare directly, since both are run by the same issuer (BlackRock/iShares) and both track the same index — the S&P 500. However, they differ in the key areas affected by the ETF domicile. IVV CSPX Domicile United States Ireland Tracks S&P 500 S&P 500 Expense Ratio (TER) 0.03% 0.07% US Dividend Withholding Tax 30% 15% Dividend Handling Distributing Accumulating Despite tracking an identical index, CSPX's lower withholding-tax drag and automatic reinvestment of dividends mean a larger share of the underlying return stays inside the fund, year after year. Illustrating the Compounding Effect To isolate just the withholding-tax effect, assume US$50,000 is invested, with a constant 1.3% dividend yield reinvested each year, and identical price returns for both funds, since they track the same index. The only difference is the amount of after-tax dividend reinvested. Holding Period US-Domiciled (IVV) Ireland-Domiciled (CSPX) Difference 10 years ≈ US$54,740 ≈ US$55,810 ≈ US$1,070 20 years ≈ US$59,930 ≈ US$62,290 ≈ US$2,360 30 years ≈ US$65,610 ≈ US$69,530 ≈ US$3,910 Illustrative only. Assumes a constant 1.3% dividend yield, reinvested annually, with the withholding-tax effect isolated from price returns (which are excluded since both funds track the same index). Actual yields, tax treatment, and returns will vary, and this is not a forecast of future performance. Accumulating vs Distributing ETFs It's easy to mix up an ETF’s domicile with a dividend policy, even though they're two separate decisions. Domicile determines the tax treatment; accumulating versus distributing determines whether dividends are paid out in cash or reinvested automatically inside the fund. Most US-domiciled ETFs distribute by default, since US fund rules generally require regulated investment companies to pass through most of their income. Ireland-domiciled UCITS funds, by contrast, commonly offer both accumulating and distributing share classes side by side. Accumulating (Acc) funds reinvest dividends automatically inside the fund, which suits hands-off investors focused on long-term compounding. CSPX, VUAA, SWRD, CNDX and EIMI all fall into this category. Distributing (Dist) funds pay dividends out in cash, which suits income-focused investors who want regular payouts. VUSA, IUSA and VWRD are examples. One nuance worth flagging: choosing an accumulating share class does not avoid withholding tax. The 15% or 30% withholding tax is still deducted before the dividend is reinvested or paid out — "Acc" only changes what happens to the money afterwards, not whether tax was withheld in the first place. Popular Ireland-Domiciled ETFs for Singapore Investors A few of the more widely held Ireland-domiciled UCITS ETFs, grouped by the exposure they offer: Exposure Ticker Fund Dividend Treatment S&P 500 CSPX iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF Accumulating S&P 500 VUAA Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Acc Accumulating S&P 500 VUSA Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF Distributing Nasdaq 100 CNDX iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF Accumulating Global Equity (MSCI World) SWRD SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating Emerging Markets (MSCI EM IMI) EIMI iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF Accumulating All the funds above are domiciled in Ireland and generally benefit from the 15% US dividend withholding rate described earlier. Fund details and fees can change, so it's worth checking the current factsheet and Key Information Document before investing in any of them. Trade-Offs Worth Weighing Ireland-domiciled ETFs aren't automatically the right call in every situation. CSPX and VUAA charge around 0.07%, compared with 0.03% for IVV or VOO — a roughly four-basis-point gap that, for most investors with real US dividend exposure, is outweighed by the 15-percentage-point withholding tax saving, though it's worth checking against one’s own portfolio size and yield. The largest Ireland-domiciled funds, like CSPX, are highly liquid. However, smaller or newer UCITS ETFs can trade with wider bid-ask spreads than the largest US ETFs, where market depth is hard to beat. Currency is another factor: Ireland-domiciled ETFs are listed on European or UK exchanges and can be traded in USD, GBP or EUR depending on the listing, so it's worth checking your broker's FX conversion fees, which can offset some of the tax savings if you trade often. The US market also still has the deepest range of niche, sector, factor, and leveraged or inverse ETFs; UCITS equivalents exist for many core strategies but are more limited at the margins. Common Questions From Singapore Investors Do Singapore investors pay tax on US ETF dividends? Yes, generally — the US withholds 30% from dividends paid to Singapore-based investors holding US-domiciled ETFs, since Singapore does not have a tax treaty with the US that lowers this rate for individuals. Is CSPX automatically better than VOO for a Singapore investor? Not automatically. CSPX typically results in lower total tax drag; however, it comes at the cost of a slightly higher expense ratio. For most Singapore-based retail investors who aren't US persons, the Ireland-domiciled option tends to be more tax-efficient, but liquidity, listing currency, and your broker's fee structure are also worth comparing. Does "accumulating" mean the dividend escapes tax? No. Withholding tax is still deducted before reinvestment — accumulating funds simply removes the need to manually reinvest your payouts. Does Singapore tax capital gains on ETF investments? No. Singapore does not levy capital gains tax on individual investors, which is largely why this comparison focuses on dividend tax efficiency rather than capital gains. The Bottom Line There's no single answer that applies to every investor. The right call depends on how much of your portfolio is invested in US dividend-paying assets, how large your US-situs holdings might grow over time, your citizenship status, and how much weight you place on cost versus tax efficiency. As a general rule of thumb, most Singapore-based investors who aren't US persons and are building meaningful long-term exposure to US or global equities tend to come out ahead, after tax, with an Ireland-domiciled UCITS ETF rather than its US-domiciled equivalent — without giving up access to the same underlying markets. Trade Global Markets, Including London, With POEMS Once you've decided which domicile suits you, the next step is execution. Several Ireland-domiciled ETFs, including CSPX, VUAA, SWRD and CNDX, are listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) alongside their European listings. POEMS, Phillip Securities' trading platform, gives Singapore investors access to dozens of global exchanges — including the LSE, Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX), New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), NASDAQ and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) — through a single account, so you can manage your core Singapore portfolio and your global ETF exposure in one place. Trading hours and commission rates vary by market and change from time to time, so check the latest rates and hours on the POEMS website, or speak with a Trading Representative, before placing your first trade on the London market. Open an Account Now! References [1] IRS — NRA Withholding (statutory 30% rate on US-source income to foreign persons) — https://financialhorse.com/is-dca-the-best-way-to-buy-stocks/ [2]IRAS — Gains from Sale of Property, Shares and Financial Instruments —https://www.iras.gov.sg/taxes/individual-income-tax/basics-of-individual-income-tax/what-is-taxable-what-is-not/gains-from-sale-of-property-shares-and-financial-instruments [3]iShares (BlackRock) — Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX) fund page —https://www.ishares.com/uk/individual/en/products/253743/ishares-sp-500-b-ucits-etf-acc-fund [4]iShares (BlackRock) — Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) fund page —https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239726/ishares-core-sp-500-etf [5]justETF — Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAA) fund profile — https://www.justetf.com/en/etf-profile.html?isin=IE00BFMXXD54 [6]Bogleheads Wiki — Nonresident Alien Investors and Ireland Domiciled ETFs —https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Nonresident_alien_investors_and_Ireland_domiciled_ETFs [7]POEMS — London Stock Exchange (LSE) Market Access —https://www.poems.com.sg/markets/united-kingdom-lse/ Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Netflix Upgraded to BUY on Strong Engagement and Pricing Power Despite Softer Guidance

Published on Jul 24, 2026 65

Company Overview Netflix Inc. operates as the world's leading streaming entertainment service, providing original and licensed content across various genres to members in over 190 countries. The company generates revenue through subscription fees and advertising, supported by a multi-tier pricing strategy that includes ad-supported plans. Strong Fundamentals Drive Upgrade Decision Phillip Securities Research has upgraded Netflix from ACCUMULATE to BUY, maintaining its target price of US$110. The upgrade reflects the company's robust fundamentals despite recent stock price movements, with the forward FY26 P/E ratio at an attractive 18.8 times compared to the 5-year average of 36.25 times. Key Positives Highlight Competitive Strengths Netflix's pricing power remains a cornerstone of its competitive advantage. The March 2026 price increases across key markets, including the US, Mexico, and Spain, ranging from 8% to 12.5% across major plans, have been successfully absorbed without indication of elevated churn rates. The company's multi-tier pricing strategy, including lower-priced ad-supported plans, provides consumers with flexibility to trade down rather than cancel subscriptions entirely, supporting long-term average revenue per member growth. Engagement metrics demonstrate no signs of slowing momentum. Despite facing tougher comparisons and competition from major sporting events like the Winter Olympics and FIFA World Cup, Netflix maintained healthy engagement levels. Viewing hours reached 97 billion in the first half of 2026, representing 2% year-over-year growth compared to 1.5% in the previous year. This sustained engagement, combined with membership growth and pricing initiatives, supported 13% year-over-year revenue growth across all regions. The advertising business continues its impressive scaling trajectory, remaining on track to double revenue in FY26. Netflix plans to increase investment in films and series by 10% year-over-year, reinforcing confidence in its long-term content pipeline and commitment to maintaining its competitive moat through content quality. Near-Term Headwinds Present Modest Concerns The primary negative factor centres on slightly softer third-quarter guidance amid challenging content comparisons. Netflix projected 12% year-over-year revenue growth for 3Q26, representing a modest deceleration from recent quarters. This outlook reflects a less compelling second-half content slate relative to 2025, which benefited from blockbuster releases including Stranger Things, Wednesday, and Squid Game that drove exceptional engagement. Additionally, management did not announce new initiatives such as a free ad-supported television platform, contributing to a more muted near-term outlook due to the absence of fresh catalysts. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Wells Fargo Delivers Strong Growth with 12% Loan Expansion, BUY Rating and US$115 Target Price

Published on Jul 24, 2026 29

Company Overview Wells Fargo & Company is one of America's largest financial institutions, operating across multiple segments including Consumer Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB), and Wealth and Investment Management (WIM). The bank has been navigating regulatory constraints through an asset cap removal, which has now enabled significant balance sheet expansion opportunities. Strong Second Quarter Performance Wells Fargo reported impressive second quarter 2026 earnings of US$6.4 billion, representing a 17% year-on-year increase that slightly exceeded analyst estimates. The strong performance brought first-half earnings to 52% of the full-year forecast, demonstrating robust momentum. The bank achieved a return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) of 17.7%, up from 15.2% in the prior year quarter, whilst expenses rose only 2% despite significant business growth. Comprehensive Revenue Growth Across All Segments The bank delivered exceptional fee income growth, with non-interest income rising 13% year-on-year to US$10.3 billion. Investment advisory fees increased 13% on higher market valuations, whilst investment banking fees surged 35% as corporates returned to the debt and equity capital markets. Markets revenue grew 24%, supported by venture capital gains. Every business segment contributed to growth, with CIB revenue up 16%, WIM growing 13% with client assets reaching US$2.4 trillion, and both Consumer Banking and Commercial Banking expanding 6%. Non-interest income now represents 46% of total revenue, up from 44% previously. Balance Sheet Expansion Drives Net Interest Income For the first time in a decade, Wells Fargo achieved double-digit balance sheet growth. Average loans expanded 12% year-on-year to US$1.03 trillion, whilst deposits grew by 10% to US$1.47 trillion. This growth occurred across both consumer and commercial businesses, with CIB average loans rising 26% as the bank redeployed capacity freed by the asset cap removal. Net interest income rose 5% year-on-year to US$12.3 billion, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of growth. The bank maintained full-year NII guidance of approximately US$50 billion, with management indicating stronger growth expected in the second half. Research Recommendation Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY rating with a higher target price of US$115, raised from US$98 previously. The upgrade reflects increased earnings estimates driven by higher NII, investment advisory, brokerage and investment banking forecasts, alongside lower provision estimates. The bank remains the top pick among major banks, offering unique growth opportunities through post-asset cap expansion at attractive valuations of 10.3 times forward price-to-earnings versus 12 times to 14 times for peers. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Magnificent 7 Technology Stocks Face Sharp Pullback Amid AI Spending Concerns, Despite Strong Demand Fundamentals

Published on Jul 24, 2026 20

Market Performance and Key Concerns The Magnificent 7 technology stocks experienced a significant pullback in June 2026, declining 8.5% compared to May's positive 5.4% performance. This sharp reversal saw the group substantially underperform both the S&P 500, which fell 1.1%, and the NASDAQ, which declined 2.8%. The decline was primarily driven by investor concerns over the substantial artificial intelligence spending commitments from major hyperscalers, including Microsoft (-17%), Meta (-11%), Amazon (-12%), and Google (-6%). These concerns were amplified by the four hyperscalers raising approximately US$139 billion in bonds during the first half of 2026, representing a 35% increase from their total bond issuances in 2025. Additional uncertainty emerged following the appointment of new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh in May, raising speculation about potential interest rate increases that could elevate AI financing costs. Individual Stock Performance Microsoft emerged as the biggest laggard, falling 17% after providing aggressive capital expenditure guidance of US$190 billion for fiscal year 2026, which exceeded consensus estimates of US$155 billion by 23%. This increase was attributed to higher-than-expected component prices driven by surging memory costs. Meta declined 11% amid reports that the company was considering raising tens of billions in equity funding to support its capital expenditure plans. Fundamental Demand Remains Strong Despite market concerns, research indicates that hyperscaler capital expenditure decisions are fundamentally sound, driven by genuine organic demand rather than speculative supply planning. The combined first quarter 2026 backlog for Microsoft, Google, and Amazon increased 46% year-over-year to US$873 billion, excluding deals with Anthropic and OpenAI. These partnerships, estimated at US$580 billion, are excluded from organic growth calculations due to their long-term nature of more than five years and associated execution and funding risks. The US$873 billion organic backlog serves as a reliable indicator of short-to-medium term AI demand from enterprises and sovereign nations, with the majority expected to be recognised within the next two years. Google noted that cloud revenue could have been higher if capacity constraints hadn't limited its ability to meet enterprise demand, whilst Amazon's Trainium chips are nearly fully subscribed and Microsoft anticipates capacity constraints continuing through 2026. Investment Outlook The research maintains an overweight recommendation on the Magnificent 7, noting that June's pullback reduced forward price-to-earnings valuations to 38.4 times from May's 39.7 times. The underperformance reflects broader investor rotation away from mega-cap technology stocks with high AI spending towards more attractively valued defensive sector names. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Singapore Catalist Board IPOs Outperform Mainboard; US Mega-Cap Strategy Favours Short-Term Trading

Published on Jul 23, 2026 32

Singapore IPO Performance Reveals a Market Divide Recent analysis of Singapore's initial public offering (IPO) landscape reveals a stark performance disparity between the Mainboard and Catalist Board listings, with significant implications for investors seeking exposure to newly listed companies. Singapore Mainboard IPOs have delivered disappointing results, generating an average first-day return of -2%. This lacklustre performance is further highlighted by the fact that only one-third of IPOs managed to close above their IPO price on their debut trading day. Catalist Board Emerges as the Superior Option In contrast, Singapore's Catalist Board listings present a markedly different proposition for investors. These smaller-cap offerings have delivered reliable double-digit gains on their opening day, averaging an impressive 19.8%. The sustained post-listing gains further enhance the risk-reward profile for short-term IPO speculation. The Catalist Board's average performance across various timeframes demonstrates consistent strength, with 50.5% returns after one week, 54.3% after one month, 88.3% after three months, and 114.4% after six months. US IPO Strategy Recommendations For major US IPOs, the optimal approach differs significantly from the strategies used in Singapore. Large US offerings typically generate strong opening day momentum, averaging gains of 16%. However, the recommended strategy involves riding the initial one-week to one-month momentum wave before exiting positions ahead of lock-up expirations. Importantly, historical data suggests that buying and holding mega-cap IPOs through their first year has proven to be a value-destructive proposition, making timing crucial for US IPO investments. The analysis indicates that traders seeking short-term IPO speculation should favour Singapore's Catalist Board offerings over Mainboard listings, whilst US IPO strategies should focus on capturing initial momentum rather than long-term holding. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Singapore Banking Sector Upgraded to ACCUMULATE on Rising Loan Growth and Rate Stabilisation

Published on Jul 22, 2026 64

Company Overview This analysis covers Singapore's major banking sector, focusing on the three primary banks: DBS, OCBC, and UOB. These institutions represent the core of Singapore's financial services landscape, serving both domestic and regional markets whilst benefiting from the city-state's position as a financial hub. Upgrade to ACCUMULATE Rating Phillip Securities Research has upgraded the Singapore banking sector to ACCUMULATE from Neutral, driven by accelerating loan growth, stabilising interest rates, and improved market conditions. The research house has raised target prices across all three major banks: DBS to S$76.00 from S$67.50, OCBC to S$28.50 from S$24.00, and UOB to S$43.00 from S$39.00, reflecting higher loan growth and earnings estimates. Interest Rate Environment Stabilising Singapore's 3-month SORA rose for the second consecutive month, increasing 1 basis point month-on-month to 1.07% in June. This represents the smallest year-on-year decline in 15 months at 109 basis points, suggesting that rates are beginning to bottom out. The stabilisation reflects the Federal Reserve's increasingly hawkish stance, with June projections signalling a possible rate hike and no cuts anticipated, creating a supportive backdrop for net interest margins. Strong Loan Growth and Deposit Trends Singapore loan growth continued its surge at 8.7% year-on-year, potentially leading to upward revisions to previous guidance to low- to mid-single digit growth. Current account and savings account (CASA) deposits rose 15% year-on-year, with the CASA deposits ratio improving to 20.7% from 20.5% in April, reaching the highest level since November 2022. This trend provides a tailwind for banks by lowering funding costs and cushioning net interest margin compression. Market Volatility Benefits Ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the collapsed US-Iran ceasefire and renewed strikes lifting oil prices, continue to generate market volatility. This environment benefits capital markets income and wealth management fees, providing meaningful offsets to net interest income headwinds. The sector offers attractive dividend yields of 4.1%, with ongoing share buybacks improving return on equity. DBS is preferred for its fixed dividend policy and guidance upgrade, whilst OCBC is favoured for wealth management growth and excess capital. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Q & M Dental Group Expands Asia-Pacific Presence with Major Acquisitions, Maintains BUY Rating and S$0.71 Target Price

Published on Jul 22, 2026 34

Strategic Acquisitions Drive Growth Q & M Dental Group Ltd has announced significant expansion plans through two major acquisitions that will substantially increase its regional footprint. The Singapore-based dental services provider is acquiring a 100% stake in Australia's Experteeth Dental Group and a 51% stake in Thailand's Deezy Dental Home for approximately S$107 million and S$39 million respectively. Company Profile Q & M Dental Group operates as a comprehensive dental services provider across the Asia-Pacific region. The company has established itself as a regional healthcare player in the healthcare sector, focusing on dental care services and clinic operations across multiple markets. Acquisition Details and Financing Structure The combined S$146 million purchase will be financed through S$92 million in cash and the issuance of 86.7 million new shares, representing 9.1% of existing shares. The new shares are priced at S$0.70 each and will be subject to a 15-year moratorium, ensuring long-term commitment from the vendors. The Australian acquisition targets Experteeth Dental Group, founded in 2017, which operates 40 dental clinics with 117 dentists across New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, and the Australian Capital Territory. The group operates under multiple established brands including Elevate Dental Group, Lumiere Dental Group, Ace Dental Group, Yiruda Dental Group, Prestige Dental Group, and Bubble Teeth Dental Group. The Thai acquisition involves Deezy Dental Home, also founded in 2017, which operates three dental clinics with 41 dentists. Strong Financial Backing and Growth Prospects The acquisitions are valued at an attractive price-to-earnings ratio of 11.4 times, with the Australian operation at 10 times and the Thai operation at 16 times. Importantly, the total S$146 million investment is supported by robust profit guarantees totalling S$126 million over six to eight years. This arrangement implies earnings growth of approximately 13%, with Thailand showing the highest growth potential at 22% compound annual growth rate. Analyst Outlook Phillip Securities Research maintains a positive outlook on these acquisitions, projecting that they could increase FY26 earnings per share by 1.04 cents, representing a 54% increase to 2.96 cents, excluding intangible amortisation. The research house maintains its BUY recommendation with an unchanged target price of S$0.71, based on price-to-earnings ratio of 25 times for FY26, aligned with Singapore's healthcare sector valuation. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Latest Videos

【辉立周末报】中东战火烧不停、AI泡沫恐破？黄金原油将成下一个风口？｜黄玮杰、章晶、顾明喆

Follow us

INVESTMENT

LEVERAGE

PROTECTION

THEMATIC

OTHER SERVICES

ACCREDITED INVESTOR

EDUCATION

RESEARCH

TOOLS

New to POEMS?

FUNDING

ACCOUNT MECHANICS

SEGMENTS

Account Opening

QUICK GUIDE