Funding Ratio

The funding ratio is a key financial metric to assess an organisation’s ability to meet its financial obligations. It plays a crucial role in investment analysis, particularly in pension funds, as it indicates whether an entity has enough assets to cover its liabilities. This article clearly explains the funding ratio, its importance, types, calculations, and real-world examples from the US and Singapore. 

What is a Funding Ratio? 

The funding ratio measures the proportion of an entity’s assets relative to its liabilities. A ratio of 100% suggests that an organisation has just enough assets to meet its obligations. If the ratio is above 100%, the organisation has surplus assets, while a ratio below 100% indicates a shortfall. 

In pension funds, the funding ratio helps assess whether future payouts to retirees can be met. A high funding ratio signals financial stability, whereas a low ratio suggests that additional contributions or adjustments in investment strategies may be needed. 

Understanding the Funding Ratio 

The funding ratio evaluates an organisation’s financial stability and capacity to fulfil obligations. It is particularly relevant for pension funds, where assets (such as employer and employee contributions, investment returns, and government funding) must be sufficient to cover future pension payments. 

Factors Affecting the Funding Ratio 

Several key factors influence the funding ratio: 

• Investment Performance: Higher returns on investments increase the asset value, improving the ratio, whereas poor investment performance leads to asset depletion. 

• Interest Rates: When interest rates decline, liabilities increase because the present value of future obligations rises. Conversely, higher interest rates reduce liability values. 

Types of Funding Ratios 

There are two primary ways to measure the funding ratio: 

1. Nominal Funding Ratio

This is the real-time ratio of total assets to total liabilities. It provides an up-to-date snapshot of an organisation’s financial position. 

Example: If a pension fund has US$ 1 billion in assets and US$ 800 million in liabilities, the nominal funding ratio is: 

1,000/800*100=125% 

A ratio above 100% indicates that the fund has more assets than liabilities. 

2. Policy Funding Ratio

This represents an average of funding ratios over a certain period, such as 12 months. It smooths out fluctuations caused by market volatility, providing a more stable measure of financial health. 

Example: In Singapore, pension funds use the policy funding ratio to assess long-term financial stability by averaging monthly changes in nominal ratios. 

Types of Funding Ratios 

There are two primary ways to measure the funding ratio: 

1. Nominal Funding Ratio

This is the real-time ratio of total assets to total liabilities. It provides an up-to-date snapshot of an organisation’s financial position. 

Example: If a pension fund has US$ 1 billion in assets and US$ 800 million in liabilities, the nominal funding ratio is: 

1,000/800*100=125% 

A ratio above 100% indicates that the fund has more assets than liabilities. 

2. Policy Funding Ratio

This represents an average of funding ratios over a certain period, such as 12 months. It smooths out fluctuations caused by market volatility, providing a more stable measure of financial health. 

Example: In Singapore, pension funds use the policy funding ratio to assess long-term financial stability by averaging monthly changes in nominal ratios. 

How to Calculate the Funding Ratio? 

The funding ratio is calculated using the formula: 

Funding Ratio = (Total Assets/Total Liabilities)*100 

Example Calculation 

A pension fund in the US has: 

• Total Assets: US$ 500 million 

• Total Liabilities: US$ 400 million 

Using the formula: 

500/400=125% 

This means the fund has 25% more assets than liabilities, suggesting a surplus. If the funding ratio were below 100%, the fund would need to adjust its investment strategy or seek additional contributions. 

Examples of the Funding Ratio 

Example 1: US Pension Funds 

As of 2022, US state and local pension funds faced funding challenges due to fluctuating market conditions. Reports showed that these funds had promised US$6.3 trillion in benefits but only held US$4.9 trillion in assets. This resulted in an average funding ratio of 77.9%, meaning a gap between available funds and promised payouts. 

This shortfall suggests additional employer or government contributions may be required to ensure the funds remain solvent. 

Example 2: Singapore’s Central Provident Fund (CPF) 

Singapore’s CPF is structured to maintain a strong funding ratio through mandatory contributions and conservative investment strategies. This ensures that retirement benefits are secure and the CPF remains financially stable. 

By maintaining a funding ratio above 100%, CPF can meet future obligations witho

Frequently Asked Questions