Interest Coverage Ratio
The Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) is a crucial financial metric used in the stock market and investment industry to assess a company’s ability to meet its interest obligations. It is beneficial for investors, creditors, and analysts to determine a company’s financial stability. This guide explains the concept of ICR, its formula, types, real-world examples, and its significance in economic analysis.
Table of Contents
What is the Interest Coverage Ratio?
The Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) measures how easily a company can cover its interest expenses using earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). It is an essential indicator of a company’s financial health and debt management ability.
- A higher ICR → Indicates strong financial health and a lower risk of default.
- A lower ICR → Suggests possible liquidity issues and financial distress.
Companies with a higher ICR are generally more attractive to investors and lenders because they are less likely to fail to meet their interest obligations.
Understanding Interest Coverage Ratio
The Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) measures a company’s ability to pay interest on its outstanding debt using its operating earnings. It helps determine financial stability by comparing earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to interest expenses. A higher ratio suggests more vigorous financial health, while a lower ratio indicates potential difficulty in meeting debt obligations.
This ratio benefits investors and lenders by providing insights into a company’s risk level. Industry norms and business models influence acceptable ICR levels, making comparing companies within the same sector essential for accurate analysis.
Formula and Calculation of Interest Coverage Ratio
The formula to calculate ICR is:
ICR= EBIT/Interest Expense
Where:
- EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) = Operating income before deducting interest and taxes.
- Interest Expense = Total interest paid on the company’s outstanding debt.
Example 1: Basic Calculation
Company A Financials:
- EBIT = US$8,580,000
- Interest Expense = US$3,000,000
ICR= 8,580,000/3,000,000=2.86
Interpretation:
Company A can pay its interest expenses 2.86 times using its earnings before interest and taxes. This suggests the company has a moderate ability to meet its interest obligations.
Types of Interest Coverage Ratios
The Interest Coverage Ratio has several variations, depending on the financial perspective required.
| Type | Formula | Purpose |
| EBIT Interest Coverage Ratio | EBIT ÷ Interest Expense | Most commonly used; provides a balanced view of debt repayment capacity. |
| EBITDA Interest Coverage Ratio | EBITDA ÷ Interest Expense | Includes depreciation and amortisation for a broader perspective. |
| EBITDA Less Capex Coverage Ratio | (EBITDA – Capex) ÷ Interest Expense | Accounts for capital expenditures affecting cash flow. |
- EBIT Interest Coverage Ratio
Purpose:
This is the most widely used version of the Interest Coverage Ratio. It calculates how often a company’s earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) can cover its interest expenses.
How It Works:
- EBIT represents the company’s operating income before subtracting interest and taxes.
- This version gives a balanced view of a company’s ability to meet its debt obligations.
- Since EBIT includes all operating revenues and expenses, it is not affected by tax payments or non-cash expenses like depreciation and amortisation.
Best Use Cases:
- Commonly used in financial reports and credit analysis.
- Suitable for companies across all industries, as it clearly measures debt repayment capacity.
- Helpful for comparing companies in the same industry to assess their financial stability.
- EBITDA Interest Coverage Ratio
Purpose:
This ratio is similar to the EBIT Interest Coverage Ratio but adds non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortisation. It provides a broader perspective on a company’s ability to pay interest expenses.
How It Works:
- EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortisation) represents a company’s operating income before deducting both interest and non-cash expenses.
- Since depreciation and amortisation are accounting adjustments, they do not directly affect cash flow.
- By including these figures, this ratio offers a more realistic view of available cash flow for paying interest expenses.
Best Use Cases:
- Useful for industries with high non-cash expenses, such as manufacturing, infrastructure, and real estate.
- Helps investors evaluate companies with significant depreciation costs due to large fixed assets.
- Preferred by analysts when comparing companies with different levels of capital investment.
- EBITDA Less Capex Interest Coverage Ratio
Purpose:
This ratio takes the EBITDA Interest Coverage Ratio and further adjusts it by subtracting capital expenditures (Capex). It provides an even more accurate reflection of a company’s cash availability to cover interest expenses.
How It Works:
- Capital expenditures (Capex) are funds spent on acquiring or upgrading physical assets such as property, plants, and equipment.
- Companies with high Capex (such as telecom, energy, and real estate firms) might appear profitable based on EBITDA but still have limited free cash flow.
- This ratio helps determine how much cash is available after accounting for necessary investments in physical assets.
Best Use Cases:
- Especially important for businesses with extensive infrastructure or equipment investments.
- Used by analysts to evaluate cash flow sustainability in capital-intensive industries.
- Helps lenders assess whether a company can pay interest while maintaining long-term asset investments.
Each type of ICR provides a different viewpoint based on the company’s financial structure and operational expenses.
Examples of Interest Coverage Ratio
Let’s look at some real-world examples of well-known companies to better understand the Interest Coverage Ratio.
Example: Walmart (US Market)
Walmart’s Financials (Latest Reported Year):
- Operating Income (EBIT) = US$20.428 billion
- Interest Expense = US$1.787 billion
ICR= 20.428/1.787=11.44
Interpretation:
Walmart can cover its interest payments 11.44 times, indicating strong financial stability and a very low risk of default. This makes Walmart an attractive option for investors looking for financially secure companies.
Example: Singapore Exchange (SGX: S68)
SGX Financials (Quarter Ending June 2024):
- Operating Income (EBIT) = SGX 311 million
- Interest Expense = SGX 7 million
ICR= 311/7=44.43
Interpretation:
Singapore Exchange (SGX) has an exceptionally high ICR of 45.36, meaning it generates sufficient operating income to cover its interest expenses multiple times over. This reflects a very low risk of financial distress, making SGX a stable entity in the financial market.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Interest Coverage Ratio helps investors, lenders, and analysts assess a company’s ability to meet its interest obligations. A strong ratio indicates financial stability, while a weak ratio may signal potential liquidity issues.
A high Interest Coverage Ratio means the company earns significantly more than required to cover its interest payments, indicating strong financial health and lower risk for lenders and investors.
A low ratio suggests that a company may struggle to meet interest expenses, leading to financial distress, borrowing difficulties, or even default in extreme cases.
If a company has negative operating income (EBIT), the ratio can be negative, signaling severe financial trouble and an inability to cover interest costs without external funding.
Lenders widely use this ratio to assess credit risk, investors to evaluate financial stability, and company management to monitor debt servicing capacity and make strategic financial decisions.
Related Terms
- Cost of Equity
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Industry Groups
- Income Statement
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Embedded Options
- Dynamic Asset Allocation
- Depositary Receipts
- Deferment Payment Option
- Debt-to-Equity Ratio
- Financial Futures
- Contingent Capital
- Conduit Issuers
- Calendar Spread
- Devaluation
- Cost of Equity
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Industry Groups
- Income Statement
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Embedded Options
- Dynamic Asset Allocation
- Depositary Receipts
- Deferment Payment Option
- Debt-to-Equity Ratio
- Financial Futures
- Contingent Capital
- Conduit Issuers
- Calendar Spread
- Devaluation
- Grading Certificates
- Distributable Net Income
- Cover Order
- Tracking Index
- Auction Rate Securities
- Arbitrage-Free Pricing
- Net Profits Interest
- Borrowing Limit
- Algorithmic Trading
- Corporate Action
- Spillover Effect
- Economic Forecasting
- Treynor Ratio
- Hammer Candlestick
- DuPont Analysis
- Net Profit Margin
- Law of One Price
- Annual Value
- Rollover option
- Financial Analysis
- Currency Hedging
- Lump sum payment
- Annual Percentage Yield (APY)
- Excess Equity
- Fiduciary Duty
- Bought-deal underwriting
- Anonymous Trading
- Fair Market Value
- Fixed Income Securities
- Redemption fee
- Acid Test Ratio
- Bid Ask price
- Finance Charge
- Futures
- Basis grades
- Short Covering
- Visible Supply
- Transferable notice
- Intangibles expenses
- Strong order book
- Fiat money
- Trailing Stops
- Exchange Control
- Relevant Cost
- Dow Theory
- Hyperdeflation
- Hope Credit
- Futures contracts
- Human capital
- Subrogation
- Qualifying Annuity
- Strategic Alliance
- Probate Court
- Procurement
- Holding company
- Harmonic mean
- Income protection insurance
- Recession
- Savings Ratios
- Pump and dump
- Total Debt Servicing Ratio
- Debt to Asset Ratio
- Liquid Assets to Net Worth Ratio
- Liquidity Ratio
- Personal financial ratios
- Payroll deduction plan
- Operating expenses
- Demand elasticity
- Deferred compensation
- Conflict theory
- Acid-test ratio
- Withholding Tax
- Benchmark index
- Double Taxation Relief
- Debtor Risk
- Securitization
- Yield on Distribution
- Currency Swap
- Overcollateralization
- Efficient Frontier
- Listing Rules
- Green Shoe Options
- Accrued Interest
- Market Order
- Accrued Expenses
- Target Leverage Ratio
- Acceptance Credit
- Balloon Interest
- Abridged Prospectus
- Data Tagging
- Perpetuity
- Optimal portfolio
- Hybrid annuity
- Investor fallout
- Intermediated market
- Information-less trades
- Back Months
- Adjusted Futures Price
- Expected maturity date
- Excess spread
- Quantitative tightening
- Accreted Value
- Equity Clawback
- Soft Dollar Broker
- Stagnation
- Replenishment
- Decoupling
- Holding period
- Regression analysis
- Wealth manager
- Financial plan
- Adequacy of coverage
- Actual market
- Credit risk
- Insurance
- Financial independence
- Annual report
- Financial management
- Ageing schedule
- Global indices
- Folio number
- Accrual basis
- Liquidity risk
- Quick Ratio
- Unearned Income
- Sustainability
- Value at Risk
- Vertical Financial Analysis
- Residual maturity
- Operating Margin
- Trust deed
- Profit and Loss Statement
- Junior Market
- Affinity fraud
- Base currency
- Working capital
- Individual Savings Account
- Redemption yield
- Net profit margin
- Fringe benefits
- Fiscal policy
- Escrow
- Externality
- Multi-level marketing
- Joint tenancy
- Liquidity coverage ratio
- Hurdle rate
- Kiddie tax
- Giffen Goods
- Keynesian economics
- EBITA
- Risk Tolerance
- Disbursement
- Bayes’ Theorem
- Amalgamation
- Adverse selection
- Contribution Margin
- Accounting Equation
- Value chain
- Gross Income
- Net present value
- Liability
- Leverage ratio
- Inventory turnover
- Gross margin
- Collateral
- Being Bearish
- Being Bullish
- Commodity
- Exchange rate
- Basis point
- Inception date
- Riskometer
- Trigger Option
- Zeta model
- Racketeering
- Market Indexes
- Short Selling
- Quartile rank
- Defeasance
- Cut-off-time
- Business-to-Consumer
- Bankruptcy
- Acquisition
- Turnover Ratio
- Indexation
- Fiduciary responsibility
- Benchmark
- Pegging
- Illiquidity
- Backwardation
- Backup Withholding
- Buyout
- Beneficial owner
- Contingent deferred sales charge
- Exchange privilege
- Asset allocation
- Maturity distribution
- Letter of Intent
- Emerging Markets
- Consensus Estimate
- Cash Settlement
- Cash Flow
- Capital Lease Obligations
- Book-to-Bill-Ratio
- Capital Gains or Losses
- Balance Sheet
- Capital Lease
Most Popular Terms
Other Terms
- Bond Convexity
- Compound Yield
- Brokerage Account
- Discretionary Accounts
- Industry Groups
- Growth Rate
- Green Bond Principles
- Gamma Scalping
- Funding Ratio
- Free-Float Methodology
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- Floating Dividend Rate
- Flight to Quality
- Real Return
- Protective Put
- Perpetual Bond
- Option Adjusted Spread (OAS)
- Non-Diversifiable Risk
- Merger Arbitrage
- Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)
- Income Bonds
- Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
- Flash Crash
- Equity Carve-Outs
- Cost Basis
- Deferred Annuity
- Cash-on-Cash Return
- Earning Surprise
- Bubble
- Beta Risk
- Bear Spread
- Asset Play
- Accrued Market Discount
- Ladder Strategy
- Junk Status
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Interest-Only Bonds (IO)
- Inflation Hedge
- Incremental Yield
- Industrial Bonds
- Holding Period Return
- Hedge Effectiveness
- Flat Yield Curve
- Fallen Angel
- Exotic Options
- Execution Risk
- Exchange-Traded Notes
- Event-Driven Strategy
- Eurodollar Bonds
- Enhanced Index Fund
Know More about
Tools/Educational Resources
Markets Offered by POEMS
Read the Latest Market Journal
Singapore Airlines Benefits from Fuel Hedging Amid Jet Fuel Volatility, Maintains Market Position
Aviation Sector Performance and Fuel Dynamics Singapore's aviation sector delivered steady performance in June 2026, with SATS leading gains at 14.2%, followed by Singapore Airlines at 11.6% and SIA Engineering at 7.3%. Meanwhile, CAO declined 1.1%. The sector continues to navigate volatile jet fuel markets, with Singapore jet fuel prices currently trading at US$115 per barrel, down significantly from the March 2026 peak of US$240.5 per barrel following a US-Iran peace deal that reduced prices by approximately 50%. Singapore Airlines' Strategic Positioning Singapore Airlines has demonstrated resilience through its comprehensive hedging strategy and operational adaptability. The carrier maintains a dual hedge structure covering both Brent crude and jet fuel, with 35% hedging on jet fuel and 14% on Brent crude for the second quarter of FY2026/27. This positioning has provided relative insulation from fuel price volatility compared to unhedged competitors. The airline has capitalised on several market opportunities, including rerouted demand for Asia-Europe flights stopping over in Singapore due to regional conflicts. Additionally, Singapore Airlines benefits from rising cargo yields, with global freight rates increasing 41% year-on-year to US$3.40 per kilogram. The company's budget subsidiary, Scoot, has captured demand from regional low-cost carriers that grounded aircraft during the conflict period. Market Outlook and Competitive Landscape Despite current price reductions, jet fuel remains approximately 33% above the 2025 averages of US$90 per barrel. Regional carriers show varying degrees of hedging protection, with Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Japan Airlines, and ANA maintaining stronger hedged positions. Conversely, China's Big Three airlines—Air China, China Southern, and China Eastern—remain largely unhedged and face greater exposure to fuel price fluctuations. The cargo segment presents additional opportunities, as the partial grounding of Middle East airlines has removed significant capacity from India-Europe and China/Southeast Asia-Europe routes. This capacity reduction has pushed Asia-Europe spot rates to US$5.26 per kilogram in late June, representing a 38% year-on-year increase. While Singapore Airlines' cargo revenue exposure of 11% makes it a secondary beneficiary compared to carriers with higher cargo proportions, the company still stands to benefit from elevated rates. Analysts maintain a neutral stance on air transportation, given uncertain resolution of geopolitical conflicts and the potential for renewed fuel price volatility if ceasefires break down. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Gold in 2026: Why Analysts Believe the Rally May Continue
Gold has emerged as one of the strongest-performing major asset classes, attracting investors seeking portfolio diversification and protection against economic uncertainty. After delivering exceptional returns in 2025, many market analysts continue to see upside potential for gold in 2026. Gold at a Glance Metric Value Spot Gold Price (11 June 2026) US$4,073/oz 2026 Peak Price US$5,595/oz J.P. Morgan Bull Case Target US$6,300/oz 2025 Return +60% These figures illustrate why gold remains one of the most discussed asset classes among investors. Ways to Invest in Gold Investors can gain exposure to gold through several investment vehicles, each offering different benefits and risks. Investment Type Suitable For Key Benefits Physical Gold Long-term holders Direct ownership Gold ETFs Most retail investors Low cost, easy trading Mining Stocks Growth investors Potentially higher returns Futures & CFDs Experienced traders Leveraged exposure Why Many Investors Prefer Gold ETFs Gold ETFs have become one of the easiest ways to invest in gold because they offer exposure to the price of gold without the need to buy, store, or insure physical bullion. The infographic compares US-listed Gold ETFs and highlights their management fees and fund sizes. The Investment Case for Gold Gold has historically been viewed as both a defensive asset and a portfolio diversifier. During periods of inflation, geopolitical uncertainty, or financial market volatility, investors often increase their allocations to gold. Why Investors Consider Gold Acts as a hedge against inflation Diversifies investment portfolios Preserves purchasing power over time Can perform well during market uncertainty Offers high global liquidity Should You Buy Physical Gold or Gold ETFs? For most retail investors, Gold ETFs offer several advantages: Feature Physical Gold Gold ETF Storage Required Yes No Easy to Trade Limited Yes Brokerage Account No Yes Liquidity Moderate High Ongoing Costs Storage & Insurance Management Fee Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Singapore Equities Show Strong Momentum as AI Cycle Drives Growth, Banks and Semiconductors Favoured
Market Performance and Outlook Singapore equities have demonstrated robust performance, posting their fourth consecutive quarter of gains with a 5.8% rise in 2Q26. The market reached record highs on 25th June and was up 11.3% for the first half of 2026. The ceasefire in the Middle East has particularly benefited transportation stocks, whilst increased volatility supported exchanges and banking shares. Expectations of bottoming interest rates have further rallied banking stocks, though energy-related equities have faced pressure from sluggish oil and gas capital expenditure and falling energy prices. AI Investment Cycle: Booming Not Bubbling Phillip Securities Research maintains that current market conditions do not constitute an AI bubble. The firm identifies several key factors supporting this view. Massive AI and data centre capital expenditure by hyperscalers, including Oracle and Meta, is expected to rise 73% in 2026 and 22% in 2027, cascading into substantial semiconductor purchases with billings rising 86% year-to-date to reach an annualised US$1 trillion . Wafer fabrication capital expenditure is projected to jump 40% year-on-year to US$175 billion. The driving force behind this spending stems from frontier AI models, particularly Anthropic and OpenAI, whose combined revenue could total US$85 billion this year. Under an S-curve growth trajectory, revenue is expected to reach US$300 billion by 2030, justifying the capital expenditure spike. Current technology sector valuations remain significantly below dot-com bubble levels, with Nvidia trading at 24 times price-to-earnings compared to Cisco's peak of 150 times forward price-to-earnings in 2000. Investment Strategy and Sector Preferences The research house favours banks, semiconductors, building materials, power, and higher-yielding REITs. Banking stocks benefit from resilient dividend yields of around 4% and loan growth surging towards 8% year-on-year, a four-year high. A major spike in deposits following the Middle East conflict, with March recording a S$66 billion jump compared to the prior five-year monthly average of S$9 billion , should help lower funding costs. Semiconductor stocks are expected to register the fastest growth, fuelled by record demand from key equipment customers including ASML, Applied Materials, and Lam Research. In construction, whilst order momentum has slowed, activity has increased, supporting a 29% rise in ready-mixed concrete demand. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
ETF Monthly Outlook: Sideways Consolidation Expected Across Most Asset Classes in July 2026
Market Overview and Performance Summary The ETF market landscape presents a mixed picture heading into July 2026, with most major asset classes expected to enter periods of sideways consolidation following varied performance in June. According to the latest monthly analysis, investors should prepare for range-bound trading across several key exchange-traded funds tracking major indices and commodities. Asset Class Performance Analysis Equities showed divergent trends during June, with the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) ending two consecutive months of gains with a 0.9% decline. The fund is expected to extend its sideways consolidation from June into July as markets digest recent moves. In contrast, Singapore equities demonstrated strength, with the SPDR Singapore Equities ETF (ES3) posting its third consecutive monthly gain of 3% in June, though analysts expect consolidation after the ETF reached target levels. Fixed income markets remained relatively stable, with the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) trading flat during June. The bond ETF is anticipated to remain range-bound between US$93.40 and US$95.40 in July, extending a sideways consolidation pattern that has persisted since mid-March. Commodities faced significant headwinds, particularly in the precious metals sector. The SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) recorded its fourth consecutive monthly decline, tumbling 11.6% in June. Despite this weakness, analysts expect sideways consolidation in July, with support likely to hold at US$77.50 should the price retest the swing low from October 2025. Energy sector weakness continued, with the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) falling 5.4% in June, marking its third consecutive monthly decline. The ETF is expected to consolidate sideways in July, with support anticipated in the US$148 to US$154 area. Notable Underperformers The cryptocurrency space showed particular vulnerability, with the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) tumbling 20.2% in June, marking its second consecutive monthly decline. Unlike other asset classes, Bitcoin ETFs are expected to continue their bearish trend in July, potentially retesting the US$7.44 swing low from August 2024, representing a 6.7% downside from current levels. Asian markets also faced pressure, with the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index ETF (2828) declining 9.6% in June for its second consecutive monthly drop. However, sideways consolidation is expected, with support between HKD$74.65 and HKD$77.10. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Software Sector Remains Resilient Amid AI Disruption Concerns
Market Performance and Sector Dynamics The software sector experienced notable volatility in the first quarter of 2026, with the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) declining 20% year-to-date despite a 4% quarter-on-quarter recovery. This performance significantly lagged the S&P 500's 8% gain, reflecting investor concerns about higher capital expenditure guidance and a rotation towards AI infrastructure plays. Within the ETF, performance diverged sharply across different software categories. Cybersecurity leaders Palo Alto Networks (PANW) and CrowdStrike (CRWD) outperformed, alongside data analytics companies MongoDB (MDB) and Snowflake (SNOW). However, traditional software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies faced significant pressure, with Palantir declining 40%, Adobe falling 44%, and Salesforce dropping 43% amid SaaS derating and concerns about agentic AI disruption. Fundamental Strength Persists Despite market pessimism surrounding potential AI disruption, the underlying fundamentals of the software sector remain robust. SaaS companies delivered their strongest revenue performance in 14 quarters, with last-12-months revenue growth accelerating to 17% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2026, representing a 4.4 percentage point improvement from the previous year. Large-cap SaaS companies demonstrated particular resilience, maintaining 17% year-on-year growth while preserving superior profitability metrics. This performance suggests that market leaders have experienced limited disruption from AI technologies, contrary to broader market concerns about sector-wide displacement. Investment Strategy and Outlook Phillip Securities Research maintains an OVERWEIGHT rating on the software sector, focusing on three key areas positioned to benefit from AI adoption: SaaS infrastructure, cybersecurity, and data analytics. Top stock picks include Microsoft, Oracle, Palantir, and Palo Alto Networks, supported by strong AI and cloud adoption trends, robust demand visibility, and growing cybersecurity requirements. The current valuation environment presents opportunities, with large-cap SaaS companies trading at EV/Sales ratios of 9.5 times, representing the negative one standard deviation level despite rising software revenue and net income. The strategy emphasizes companies that provide essential AI infrastructure, maintain mission-critical cybersecurity functions, and offer data analytics capabilities crucial for enterprise AI implementation. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
UltraGreen.ai Positioned for Growth with ICG Platform Expansion, BUY Rating and US$1.92 Target Price
Phillip Securities Research has initiated coverage on UltraGreen.ai with a BUY rating and target price of US$1.92, highlighting the company's transformation from a traditional dye and hardware business into an integrated indocyanine green (ICG) platform. The research firm's valuation is based on DCF analysis, utilising a 10% WACC and 7 times exit multiple. The company is currently trading at FY26e forward P/E of 15.2 times and EV/EBITDA of 16 times. Company Overview UltraGreen.ai operates in the fluorescence-guided surgery market, providing ICG dyes and near-infrared imaging hardware to healthcare providers. The company is expanding its business model beyond commodity products to become a comprehensive ICG platform provider, incorporating data analytics and software solutions. Market Opportunity and Penetration Drivers Strong market tailwinds are driving greater ICG penetration across both established and emerging surgical procedures globally. Currently, ICG penetration across surgical procedures remains in the low double-digits, with the exception of choroid diagnostics. However, penetration rates are expected to increase by double digits across the majority of procedures using fluorescence-guided surgery by 2028. The primary driver for this expansion is the growing adoption of ICG as a standard of care, with major surgical societies incorporating ICG into their clinical guidelines. A significant catalyst for UltraGreen.ai will be the expiry of Novadaq's Breast Sentinel Lymph Node exclusivity in June 2026, enabling the company to file for US approval and potentially capture a US$66.2 million market opportunity at full ICG penetration. Platform Business Transformation UltraGreen.ai is strategically expanding from its traditional dye plus hardware business into an integrated ICG platform through its PerfusionWorks quantification software and cloud platform. The PerfusionWorks software is expected to receive Europe MDR regulatory approval by 2H26, with subsequent US FDA filing planned to use the European dataset. Notably, the software is camera agnostic and can be used with competitors' imaging hardware, making every near-infrared-capable imaging device a potential customer. This approach addresses the critical obstacle of subjectivity in fluorescence imaging assessment by providing objective and reproducible perfusion data, thereby facilitating standardisation required for broader ICG adoption as a standard of care. Growth Strategy and Financial Position The company maintains a robust financial position, with net cash of US$176.1 million and is pursuing growth initiatives worth approximately US$150 million in potential investments or acquisitions across API suppliers, distributors, and lyophilisation companies. UltraGreen.ai also plans to transition from distributor models to direct sales in select markets, reducing distributor fees and enabling direct hospital relationships. This would support the bundling ICG vials with NIR cameras and cross-selling PerfusionWorks software. The research forecasts a 2-year earnings CAGR of 18.6%. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Company Overview Thai Beverage PLC operates as one of Southeast Asia's leading beverage companies, with significant operations spanning alcoholic beverages, including beer and spirits, as well as non-alcoholic products. The company has established itself as a major player in the regional market through its diverse portfolio and strategic investments, including its position as the second-largest shareholder in Vinamilk, one of the Vietnam’s largest dairy companies. Strategic Response to Consumer Pressures Thai Beverage is implementing a comprehensive five-pronged strategy to address the current challenging consumer environment. The company is focusing on smaller pack sizes and stock-keeping units (SKUs) to achieve more affordable price points, recognising that consumers are searching for value during this difficult period. The strategy extends to health and wellness through protein-based non-alcoholic products, whilst offering greater convenience through ready-to-drink (RTD) spirits. The RTD spirits initiative represents a particularly strategic move, as it does not cannibalise existing distilled spirits sales but instead makes products more accessible and convenient for consumers. This category can attract consumers from the beer segment whilst delivering higher gross margins due to lower excise duties compared to beer. Importantly, existing manufacturing capacity already supports RTD spirits production, requiring minimal additional capital expenditure. Financial Outlook and Market Position The company's financial position is expected to strengthen as free cash flow improves following major capital expenditure over the past two years in Cambodia and a dairy farm in Malaysia. This improved balance sheet provides flexibility for potential acquisitions, whilst forward purchases of raw materials are largely hedged for the current financial year's requirements. Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation with a target price of S$0.53, highlighting Thai Beverage’s attractive valuations at 10 times FY26e earnings, with a dividend yield of approximately 5.5%. Margins are expected to remain resilient due to lower-priced raw materials purchased and disciplined operating cost management. The potential spinoff of Beerco presents an asset monetisation opportunity, particularly given Southeast Asia's, especially Vietnam's, attractiveness to strategic investors as a growing consumer market. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Micron Technology Benefits from AI Memory Demand and Tight Supply
Company Overview Micron Technology, Inc. is a leading semiconductor company specializing in memory solutions, producing both DRAM and NAND flash memory products for various applications including mobile, client, and automotive markets. Strong Financial Performance Driven by ASP Surge Micron delivered exceptional third-quarter FY2026 results, with adjusted profit after tax and minority interests spiking 12.2 times year-on-year to a record US$28.9 billion. This remarkable performance was underpinned by 41% year-on-year bit shipment growth and substantial average selling price (ASP) increases, estimated at 215% for DRAM and 272% for NAND products. The nine-month FY2026 revenue and adjusted PATMI reached 73% and 72% of full-year forecasts respectively, indicating strong momentum. Revenue surged to US$42 billion whilst profit margins expanded significantly, with gross margins reaching 84.9%, driven primarily by the higher ASPs across both memory segments. Strategic Customer Agreements Reduce Cyclicality A key positive development is Micron's progress in securing long-term strategic customer agreements (SCAs). The company has signed 16 such agreements to date, covering approximately 20% of DRAM volume and 30% of NAND volume from 2026 to 2030. These agreements represent US$100 billion in remaining performance obligations, equivalent to 2.7 times FY25 revenue, with US$22 billion in cash deposits and financial commitments from customers. The SCAs include price bands with floor prices that enable higher gross margins than Micron's historical peak of 63%. This structure provides greater revenue visibility and reduces the company's traditional cyclical exposure, although approximately 75% of revenue remains subject to cyclical demand patterns in mobile, client, and automotive segments. Market Dynamics Support Pricing Power Memory supply remains constrained due to lengthy lead times for new fabrication facility expansions, which typically require 2 to 4 years, alongside persistent cleanroom space limitations. Customers are prioritizing volume security over price considerations, leading major players including Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron to sign longer-term contracts spanning 3 to 5 years, compared to typical one-year commitments historically. Investment Recommendation Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY rating with a raised target price of US$1870, reflecting increased FY27 revenue and PATMI forecasts raised by 16% and 23% respectively. The valuation assumes a 14 times FY27 price-to-earnings ratio, representing a 52% discount to peers' average forward P/E of 29 times, acknowledging the remaining cyclical exposure in non-SCA revenue streams. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
