Seasoned Equity Offering
In the world of finance and stock market investments, it is always about realising ways in which companies can raise more capital to expand, grow, or clear debt. A Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) is among the various methods such firms apply. An SEO offering often has implications that go a long way for the company and its shareholders. In this article, we will break down a seasoned equity offering, how it works, the different types of SEOs, and their impact on existing shareholders. We will focus on the U.S. and Singaporean markets, which are common bases for established companies to issue SEOs.
Table of Contents
- What is a Seasoned Equity Offering?
- Understanding Seasoned Equity Offering
- Benefits of Seasoned Equity Offering
- Disadvantages Seasoned Equity Offering
- Types of Seasoned Equity Offerings
- Impact of SEOs on Existing Shareholders
- Examples of Seasoned Equity Offering
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Seasoned Equity Offering?
A Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) is the issue of fresh shares by an already-listed company to the public to raise funds. In an SEO, there is no fresh issue of the company’s shares, as happens in an IPO, where a company first issues its shares to the public. Instead, an SEO is an offering of shares by companies already listed on the stock exchange. These firms use SEOS to raise more funds for diverse purposes, such as expanding operations, reducing debt, acquiring new assets, or improving liquidity.
In an SEO, the issuing company issues new shares to investors, usually at a price set during an offering process. Institutional or retail investors can buy these newly issued shares. An SEO can be structured in a number of ways based on the company’s objectives and current financial position.
SEOs can occur at any time but typically occur when a company needs capital after going public. Recently, companies like Tesla and Apple have conducted SEOs to finance innovation and growth in their industries.
Understanding Seasoned Equity Offering
A seasoned equity offering is how companies raise funds without increasing debt. In a nutshell, it enables them to float more shares and tap public investors for money. SEOs are different from IPO offerings primarily because listed companies offer them. In the U.S., this type of offering is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), while in Singapore, it is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Singapore Exchange (SGX).
The basic feature of SEOs is that they enable public companies that have already gone public to raise capital. Companies usually issue SEOs when they are growing, need to strengthen their finances, or invest in new projects that require a lot of capital.
Benefits of Seasoned Equity Offering
- Raising Capital: They enable companies to raise large amounts of capital without increasing their debt burden.
- Flexibility: The funds raised through SEOs can be used for various purposes, including acquisitions, debt refinancing, or operations expansion.
- Rapid Process: Compared to an IPO, an SEO is quicker since the company is already listed and thus less onerous in terms of regulatory requirements and paperwork.
Disadvantages Seasoned Equity Offering
- Dilution: The issuance of additional shares typically results in dilution of the ownership of existing shareholders.
- Market Reaction: If the market views the issue as a negative signal (an indicator of financial distress), the stock price may decline.
Types of Seasoned Equity Offerings
seasoned equity offerings can take several forms. Knowing the various types helps investors and companies determine which method best suits their needs.
Rights Offering:
Existing shareholders will have a chance to purchase these newly issued shares proportionally to their existing holdings by accepting this form of rights offering at the prescribed price or perhaps lower than its normal selling value. This will benefit existing investors so they don’t lose any stake in the business entity.
For instance, if a shareholder holds 100 shares in a firm making a rights issue, he may be able to purchase extra shares at a discount, meaning he would retain his shareholding percentage.
Benefits: Rights issues allow existing shareholders to continue holding the shares and prevent dilution if they buy the newly issued shares.
Public Offering
In a public offering, the company sells new shares directly to the market or to institutional investors, and existing shareholders are not given the chance to buy these new shares.
This type of offer can result in more dilution for current shareholders, as the total number of shares outstanding increases.
Benefits: Unless well managed, they dilute existing shareholders and tend to lower the share price.
Private Placement
The issuance of new shares to institutional or accredited investors other than the public is termed a private placement SEO.
It typically takes less time and has a lower regulatory threshold than a public offering. There is also potentially less market distraction to the issuing company’s operations.
Benefits: It involves relatively quicker and less complex fundraising that may be undertaken for strategic or specific investments that can be effectively made.
Risks: Placements are priced at a discount to the issue price, diluting existing shares.
At-the-Market Offering (ATM):
In an At-the-Market Offering, the corporation issues shares directly to the public in the market at prevailing prices during a certain period, as opposed to in one shot.
This approach decreases the shock in the stock price, which usually goes along with public issues of a bigger magnitude.
Benefits: This offering creates negligible market disruption because of progressively selling shares.
Risks: It takes more time to raise the needed capital than other offering methods.
Impact of SEOs on Existing Shareholders
The SEOS will have many essential effects on existing shareholders, and all these have to be understood prior to investing in any company conducting the SEO process.
Dilution of Ownership. The SEOs’ first significant impact on existing shareholders is probably the dilution factor. Dilution occurs due to the increase in the outstanding share capital brought by issuing new shares.
For example, suppose an investor holds 10% of a company, and the company issues 20% more shares. In that case, the investor’s percentage ownership will be reduced unless he or she participates in the offering.
Impact on Stock Price:
The effect of an SEO on stock prices is usually negative, especially when the market perceives the offering as a signal of financial distress or when it leads to substantial dilution of ownership.
However, in a situation where the raised capital is good for the firm to grow ahead—for instance, financing an acquisition project or important research—the price for the firm’s shares tends to move higher, especially over time.
Impact on Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Because of issuing new equity and increasing outstanding shares, SEO’s earnings per share declined. Other things are equal except when new money is generated proportionately, increasing earnings. Lower EPS can hurt investor sentiment, and the stocks may decline.
Voting Power
The non-participating shareholders in the offering could lose voting power as the increased number of issued shares increases the number of outstanding shares. This would be particularly significant for companies having a large institutional shareholder base.
Examples of Seasoned Equity Offering
U.S. Market Example
Tesla, Inc.: In 2020, Tesla conducted a seasoned equity offering that raised around $5 billion. The company sold additional shares in the market, which was seen as a cause for concern due to dilution. However, Tesla’s promising growth prospects and market position saw a rebound in the stock price after the offering. The funds were used to speed up product development and infrastructure expansion.
Singapore Market Example
SATS Ltd.: In 2020, SATS Ltd., a food and gateway services leader, completed a seasoned equity offering to enhance its balance sheet with much-needed capital during the COVID-19 pandemic. This allowed SATS to invest in its digital transformation and manage liquidity in times of uncertainty.
Conclusion
A Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) is a powerful tool companies use to raise capital while maintaining their listing on a public exchange. An SEO is the most critical tool in corporate finance strategies both within the U.S. and the Singapore markets for funding expansion or paying off debts as well as opening new ventures. Still, there needs to be utmost consideration for shareholders on potential dilution, stock price changes, and impacts on voting power. Investor decisions within the stock market depend much on understanding the two types of SEOs and the implications involved.
Frequently Asked Questions
An SEO is the second time a publicly listed company issues shares to the public, while an IPO is the first time. While an IPO is a company’s maiden entry into the public markets, an SEO refers to how companies raise additional capital after they go public.
An SEO may result in a dilution of ownership for the existing shareholders. When a firm issues more shares, the ownership percentage of the existing shareholders decreases unless they participate in the offering.
Typically, SEOs experience dilution, especially if the offering is undertaken without a rights offering (that is, where existing shareholders can buy new shares to maintain their percentage ownership). However, rights offerings offer minimal efficiency in avoiding dilution since shareholders can buy shares in proportion to the holding.
SEOs offer companies the ability to raise capital without increasing their debt. They allow businesses to finance expansion, acquisitions, or investments in new projects. To investors, an SEO may be a chance to buy stock at a discount (in rights offerings).
In some cases, SEOs may require shareholder approval, especially in rights offerings or when the offering results in significant dilution. However, public offerings and private placements may not require shareholder approval if the board of directors has already authorised the issuance of new shares.
Related Terms
- Merger Arbitrage
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Callable Preferred Stock
- Growth Stocks
- Market maker
- Authorized Stock
- Dividend Discount Model
- Stock Shifts
- Price to Book
- Stock Price
- Consumer Stock
- Undervalued Stocks
- Tracking Stock
- Income stocks
- Hang Seng Index
- Merger Arbitrage
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Callable Preferred Stock
- Growth Stocks
- Market maker
- Authorized Stock
- Dividend Discount Model
- Stock Shifts
- Price to Book
- Stock Price
- Consumer Stock
- Undervalued Stocks
- Tracking Stock
- Income stocks
- Hang Seng Index
- Rally
- Ticker Symbol
- Defensive stock
- Earnings Guidance
- Wire house broker
- Stock Connect
- Options expiry
- Payment Date
- Treasury Stock Method
- Reverse stock splits
- Ticker
- Restricted strict unit
- Gordon growth model
- Stock quotes
- Shadow Stock
- Margin stock
- Dedicated Capital
- Whisper stock
- Voting Stock
- Deal Stock
- Microcap stock
- Capital Surplus
- Multi-bagger Stocks
- Shopped stock
- Secondary stocks
- Screen stocks
- Quarter stock
- Orphan stock
- One-decision stock
- Repurchase of stock
- Stock market crash
- Half stock
- Stock options
- Stock split
- Foreign exchange markets
- Stock Market
- FAANG stocks
- Unborrowable stock
- Joint-stock company
- Over-the-counter stocks
- Watered stock
- Zero-dividend preferred stock
- Bid price
- Authorised shares
- Auction markets
- Market capitalisation
- Arbitrage
- Market capitalisation rate
- Garbatrage
- Autoregressive
- Stockholder
- Penny stock
- Noncyclical Stocks
- Hybrid Stocks
- Large Cap Stocks
- Mid Cap Stocks
- Common Stock
- Preferred Stock
- Small Cap Stocks
- Earnings Per Share (EPS)
- Diluted Earnings Per Share
- Dividend Yield
- Cyclical Stock
- Blue Chip Stocks
- Averaging Down
Most Popular Terms
Other Terms
- Bond Convexity
- Compound Yield
- Brokerage Account
- Discretionary Accounts
- Industry Groups
- Growth Rate
- Green Bond Principles
- Gamma Scalping
- Funding Ratio
- Free-Float Methodology
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- Floating Dividend Rate
- Flight to Quality
- Real Return
- Protective Put
- Perpetual Bond
- Option Adjusted Spread (OAS)
- Non-Diversifiable Risk
- Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)
- Income Bonds
- Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
- Flash Crash
- Equity Carve-Outs
- Cost of Equity
- Cost Basis
- Deferred Annuity
- Cash-on-Cash Return
- Earning Surprise
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Bubble
- Beta Risk
- Bear Spread
- Asset Play
- Accrued Market Discount
- Ladder Strategy
- Junk Status
- Interest-Only Bonds (IO)
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- Inflation Hedge
- Industry Groups
- Incremental Yield
- Industrial Bonds
- Income Statement
- Holding Period Return
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Hedge Effectiveness
- Flat Yield Curve
- Fallen Angel
- Exotic Options
- Execution Risk
Know More about
Tools/Educational Resources
Markets Offered by POEMS
Read the Latest Market Journal
Buffer ETFs — What Are They and How Do They Work?
Introduction to Buffer ETFs Buffer ETFs are constructed using options and are also known as defined-outcome ETFs, offering investors a preset range of potential returns and risks over a typical one-year period. In other words, they’re designed to limit downside losses while still allowing you to stay invested in the market. Think of them as a way to smooth out volatility without completely giving up growth opportunities. First Trust Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December 2025 (FDEC) Here’s a quick illustration: FDEC.US offers up to 14.76% potential upside while absorbing the first 10% of market losses. This allows investors to participate in potential growth with a built-in buffer. If SPY.US finishes the outcome period with returns between 0% and –10%, the investor would not incur losses (before fees). Overview of MAS SIP Requirements As Buffer ETFs use more complex structures, they fall under Specified Investment Products (SIPs). This means investors must demonstrate a certain level of knowledge before trading them. Since 2012, in alignment with the Monetary Authority of Singapore's efforts to enhance trading protections for retail investors, brokers are required to assess an investor's relevant knowledge and experience before permitting investments in SIPs. As a result, investors must complete the Customer Account Review (CAR) eligibility form before being allowed to invest in listed SIPs. If you’re new to these products, you can build your understanding by completing the SIP product knowledge module offered through the SGX Academy to become eligible to trade. How does Buffer ETFs work? Buffer ETFs achieve their defined outcomes through the use of options strategies, primarily by combining long and short options on market indices such as the S&P 500. By understanding how these option combinations work, you can better appreciate how the ETF is constructed and how its risk-reward profile is designed. This makes it easier to evaluate whether a Buffer ETF aligns with your investment goals, especially in volatile market conditions. First Trust Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - December 2024 (FDEC) The payoff structure of FDEC.US can be visualised via the risk-return chart available on the First Trust website, as well as those of other Buffer ETF issuers. The diagram illustrates how the downside buffer and upside cap interact to shape investor outcomes over the defined outcome period. According to the fund’s Objective/Strategy section, FDEC.US aims to deliver returns (before fees and expenses) that match the price return of the SPY ETF (which tracks the SP500 index), up to a predetermined upside cap of 14.76%, while providing a 10% buffer against the first losses of the reference asset for the outcome period from 23 December 2024 to 19 December 2025. Buffer ETFs, such as FDEC.US, typically reset annually. The options contracts that underpin the buffer-cap structure expire at the end of the outcome period, after which a new outcome period begins with newly defined cap and buffer levels, based on prevailing interest rates and market volatility. Investors can hold the ETF through the expiry of one period and into the next; however, it is essential to note that the cap and buffer terms may vary from one period to the next. Why Buffer ETFs Are Designed for Long-Term Investors Buffer ETFs work best when held for the entire outcome period, as this allows the built-in options strategy to fully deliver the intended balance between downside protection and capped upside participation. Entering or exiting mid-period can result in different outcomes from those originally designed. S&P 500 Historical Annual Returns (1927-2025)Source: Macrotrends Looking at the historical data, the S&P 500 has delivered strong average returns over time. While positive years are more common, market downturns can still occur, and the index is typically down by around 10% during negative periods. Therefore, Buffer ETFs may serve as a useful tool for managing downside risk, given the built-in buffer. The Drawbacks and Risks of Buffer ETFs 1. Limited Upside (Capped Returns) Buffer ETFs offer downside protection but cap upside potential. If the market rallies strongly, investors will not fully participate, resulting in an opportunity cost compared to traditional index ETFs. 2. Protection Only Works Within a Specific Outcome Period Each Buffer ETF operates within a defined outcome period (typically one year). The buffer and upside cap apply only when the ETF is held for the full period, due to the structure of the underlying options. Selling before the end of the outcome period may lead to unexpected losses or reduced gains. Buying mid-cycle may result in a partially utilised buffer or a lower effective cap. 3. The Buffer Can Be “Used Up” If the underlying index declines more than the stated buffer (e.g., a 10% buffer versus a 20% market drop), the ETF will begin to experience losses beyond the protected range. The buffer does not eliminate all downside risk. 4. Potential Underperformance in Flat or Choppy Markets When markets are sideways or mildly volatile, the combination of capped upside and embedded options costs can cause Buffer ETFs to underperform a standard index ETF tracking the same benchmark. 5. Higher Expense Ratios Buffer ETFs generally carry higher management fees, typically around 0.5% to 1%, compared with traditional S&P 500 ETFs, which often charge less than 0.05%. 6. Return Lag in Volatile Markets Because Buffer ETFs are constructed using options, sharp market movements can cause pricing lag due to changes in option premiums. For example, if the S&P 500 (SPY.US) rises 5% during a volatile period, a corresponding Buffer ETF might rise only around 4.2%, depending on where it is in its outcome period and how its options are priced. List of Buffer ETFs Buffer ETFs are designed to provide downside protection while allowing investors to participate in market gains, making them an attractive choice for those seeking a more controlled approach to equity investing. Below is a list of popular Buffer ETFs available in the market: Issuer Underlying Offered Buffer ETFs Ticker Code First Trust SPY Monthly 10% Buffer FJAN, FFEB, FMAR, FAPR, FMAY, FJUN, FJUL, FAUG, FSEP, FOCT, FNOV, FDEC iShares IVV Quarterly 10% Buffer STEN, TEND, TENM, TENJ First Trust QQQ Quarterly 10% Buffer QMAR, QJUN, QSPT, QDEC First Trust EFA Quarterly 10% Buffer YMAR, YJUN, YSEP, YDEC These ETFs are suited to investors seeking strategic market exposure with controlled risk, particularly in volatile market environments. Should You Invest in a Buffer ETF? Buffer ETFs can be an attractive choice for investors looking to gain exposure to equity markets while actively managing risk. These ETFs offer built-in downside protection, which can help mitigate the impact of moderate market declines and provide clearly defined potential gains and losses over a fixed outcome period. They are particularly suited for investors with a tactical investment approach who intend to hold the ETF for the full outcome period to fully benefit from the buffer structure. By tracking major indices such as the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq 100, Buffer ETFs also offer diversified exposure to both US and international equities. However, investors should be aware that the upside returns are capped, meaning they may miss out on large market rallies, and that early exits or mid-cycle purchases can reduce the effectiveness of the protection. In addition, higher expense ratios and embedded option costs can slightly impact returns compared with traditional ETFs. Overall, Buffer ETFs are best viewed as a complement to a broader investment portfolio, offering a balance between growth potential and controlled downside risk, particularly in uncertain or volatile market conditions. Start Your Global Investment Journey Today! Open an account with POEMS and take the first step toward a diversified, globally-focused portfolio! For more information about trading on POEMS, you can visit our website or reach out to our Night Desk representatives at 6531 1225. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Oracle Corporation Raises FY27 Revenue Guidance by $4 Billion Amid Strong Cloud Growth
Oracle Corporation, a leading enterprise software and cloud computing company, has demonstrated solid performance in the first half of fiscal 2026, with revenue and adjusted profit after tax and minority interests meeting expectations at 47% and 43% of full-year forecasts respectively. The technology giant specialises in database management systems, cloud infrastructure services, and enterprise software solutions, positioning itself as a comprehensive provider in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence and cloud computing landscape. Strong Performance Driven by Cloud Infrastructure Demand The company's financial results showcase robust momentum, with group revenue climbing 14% year-over-year, primarily propelled by Oracle Cloud's impressive 34% annual growth. This expansion reflects the increasing enterprise demand for cloud infrastructure services as organisations continue their digital transformation initiatives. Additionally, Oracle recorded a substantial $2.7 billion pre-tax gain from divesting its interest in Ampere Computing, further strengthening its financial position. Raised Capital Expenditure and Revenue Projections Oracle has significantly increased its capital expenditure forecast to $50 billion for FY26, representing a $15 billion upward revision from the first quarter projection. This substantial investment reflects the company's commitment to expanding its data center infrastructure to meet growing demand. The company has also raised its FY27 revenue guidance by $4 billion, supported by higher remaining performance obligations this quarter. For the third quarter of FY26, Oracle projects group revenue growth of 16-18%, with Oracle Cloud expected to accelerate dramatically to 37-41% year-over-year growth, compared to 23% in the previous year. Adjusted earnings per share are anticipated to increase 16-18% to $1.70-1.74. Investment Outlook and Strategic Position Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation with a slightly adjusted DCF target price of $344, down from the previous $350, primarily due to the increased capital expenditure requirements. The research firm expects performance acceleration in the second half of FY26 as additional data centres become operational. Oracle's strategic positioning as a specialized Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provider and comprehensive AI solutions company, backed by a significant remaining performance obligations backlog, supports the positive outlook. The company's potential upside depends largely on the successful execution of multi-billion-dollar artificial intelligence deals. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What were Oracle's key financial highlights for the first half of FY26? A: Oracle's 1H26 revenue and adjusted PATMI were within expectations at 47% and 43% of FY26 forecasts respectively. Group revenue rose 14% year-over-year, led by Oracle Cloud's 24% growth, and the company recorded a $2.7 billion pre-tax gain from selling its Ampere Computing interest. Q: How much has Oracle raised its FY27 revenue guidance? A: Oracle has raised its FY27 revenue guidance by $4 billion following higher remaining performance obligations this quarter. Q: What is Oracle's current capital expenditure projection for FY26? A: Oracle has increased its FY26 CAPEX projection to $50 billion, which is $15 billion higher than the 1Q25 forecast Q: What growth rates does Oracle expect for Q3 FY26? A: For 3Q26, Oracle expects group revenue growth of 16-18%, with Oracle Cloud accelerating to 37-41% year-over-year growth, up from 23% a year ago. Adjusted EPS is projected to rise 16-18% to $1.70-1.74. Q: What is Phillip Securities Research's recommendation and target price for Oracle? A: Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation with a DCF target price of $344, down from the previous $350 due to increased CAPEX requirements. Q: What factors support Oracle's positive outlook according to the research? A: Oracle's position as a niche Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provider and full-stack AI provider, supported by a significant remaining performance obligations backlog, supports the bullish outlook. The company is expected to benefit from acceleration in 2H26 as more data centers come online. Q: What could drive potential upside for Oracle's stock? A: Potential upside for Oracle hinges on faster execution of multi-billion-dollar artificial intelligence deals, which could accelerate the company's growth beyond current projections. This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Adobe Inc Delivers Solid FY25 Results as Semrush Acquisition Strengthens Marketing Portfolio
Strong Financial Performance Meets Expectations Adobe Inc. has delivered solid fiscal year 2025 results in line with analyst expectations, with revenue and adjusted profit after tax and minority interest reaching 101% and 100% of forecasts, respectively. The company's fourth-quarter 2025 adjusted profit after tax and minority interest grew 8% year-on-year to US$2.3 billion, driven by stronger revenue performance and improved operating leverage across its business segments. Company Overview and Market Position Adobe Inc operates as a leading software company specializing in creative and marketing solutions for professionals and enterprises. The company's core business revolves around subscription-based services, positioning it as a dominant player in the digital content creation and marketing technology sectors. Strategic Acquisition and Forward Guidance Looking ahead to the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, Adobe has provided optimistic guidance, with adjusted earnings per share expected to be US$5.85 to US$5.90, representing 16% year-over-year growth. Revenue is projected to reach US$6.25 to US$6.30 billion, marking 10% year-on-year growth. This growth is expected to be driven primarily by a 10% increase in Creative and Marketing Professionals Subscription revenue, forecast to reach US$4.3 to US$4.33 billion. The company's strategic US$1.9 billion acquisition of Semrush is anticipated to close in the first half of fiscal year 2026, with minimal earnings-per-share impact in the initial year, before becoming accretive thereafter. This acquisition is expected to strengthen Adobe's marketing capabilities and expands its addressable market. Investment Outlook and Recommendation Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation for Adobe Inc, though with a revised DCF target price of US$487, down from the previous US$560. For fiscal year 2026, analysts expect 10% revenue growth and 6% earnings-per-share growth, supported by increased adoption of artificial intelligence and higher subscription revenue. The research firm retains a 7.3% weighted average cost of capital but has lowered the terminal growth rate to 3.5% from 4%, reflecting increased competition from generative AI solutions among smaller customers. However, risks remain limited for enterprise clients utilizing Adobe for complex workflows, where third-party models complement rather than compete with the platform. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What were Adobe's FY25 financial results compared to expectations? A: Adobe's FY25 results met expectations with revenue and adjusted PATMI at 101% and 100% of forecasts, respectively. The 4Q25 adjusted PATMI increased 8% year over year to US$2.3 billion. Q: What is Adobe's guidance for 1Q26? A: Adobe expects adjusted EPS of US$5.85-5.90 (16% YoY growth) on revenue of US$6.25-6.30 billion (10% YoY growth), with Creative & Marketing Professionals Subscription revenue growing 10% to US$4.3-4.33 billion. Q: When will the Semrush acquisition close, and what is its expected impact? A: The US$1.9 billion Semrush acquisition is expected to close in the first half of FY26 with minimal EPS impact in the first year but will be accretive thereafter. Q: What is Phillip Securities Research's recommendation and target price? A: Phillip Securities maintains a BUY recommendation with a DCF target price of US$487, down from the previous US$560. Q: What are the expected growth rates for FY26? A: For FY26, analysts expect 10% revenue growth and 6% EPS growth, supported by rising AI adoption and higher subscription revenue. Q: What factors led to the lower target price? A: The lower target price reflects a reduced terminal growth rate to 3.5% from 4% due to increased competition from generative AI among smaller customers, while maintaining a 7.3% WACC. Q: What risks does Adobe face from AI competition? A: Risks remain limited for enterprise clients using Adobe for complex workflows, where third-party AI models complement the platform rather than compete directly with it. This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Magnificent 7 Tech Stocks Post Mixed Performance in November 2025
The Magnificent 7 technology stocks experienced a challenging November 2025, with the group declining 1.9% as investors rotated out of mega-cap technology names into cyclical and financial sectors. Despite underperforming the S&P 500's 1.2% gain, the group still outperformed the NASDAQ, which fell 2.0% during the month. Market Rotation Drives Mixed Results The month was characterised by significant profit-taking and renewed valuation concerns, triggering a pronounced sector rotation away from large-cap technology stocks. This shift reflected investors' growing appetite for cyclical and financial names as market dynamics evolved. Individual performance within the Magnificent 7 varied dramatically. Google (GOOGL) emerged as the standout performer, surging 14% following the successful launch of its Gemini 3 AI model. Apple (AAPL) also posted solid gains of 3%, benefiting from strong iPhone demand and effective cost-cutting measures that supported margins. However, these gains were offset by notable declines in other group members. NVIDIA (NVDA) fell 13% as investors rotated out of AI-focused stocks amid growing valuation concerns in the sector. Tesla (TSLA) declined 6% as intensifying price competition in the electric vehicle market led to margin erosion pressures. Investment Outlook Remains Positive Despite November's mixed performance, Phillip Securities Research maintains an OVERWEIGHT recommendation on the Magnificent 7 stocks. The team believes that earnings growth for these companies, excluding Tesla, will continue to outpace both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ 100. Several key tailwinds support this optimistic outlook. The adoption and demand for artificial intelligence technologies continues to expand globally, with sovereign nations including the European Union and United Arab Emirates increasing their AI investments. Additionally, the US government's AI Action Plan, unveiled in July 2025, is expected to provide further support for the sector. The research also points to anticipated monetary policy changes, with more rate cuts expected in 2026, which could provide a favourable environment for technology stocks to resume their growth trajectory. Frequently Asked Questions Q: How did the Magnificent 7 perform compared to major indices in November 2025? A: The Magnificent 7 declined 1.9%, underperforming the S&P 500's 1.2% gain but outperforming the NASDAQ's 2.0% decline. Q: What caused the sector rotation away from mega-cap technology stocks? A: The rotation was triggered by profit-taking and renewed valuation concerns, leading investors to move into cyclical and financial sectors. Q: Which Magnificent 7 stocks performed best in November? A: Google (GOOGL) was the top performer with a 14% gain due to its successful Gemini 3 AI model launch, followed by Apple (AAPL) with a 3% increase. Q: Why did NVIDIA decline during the month? A: NVIDIA fell 13% due to investor rotation out of AI-focused stocks and growing valuation concerns in the artificial intelligence sector. Q: What is Phillip Securities Research's recommendation on the Magnificent 7? A: The firm maintains an OVERWEIGHT recommendation on the Magnificent 7 stocks, believing their earnings growth will continue to outperform major indices. Q: What factors support the positive outlook for these stocks? A: Key tailwinds include greater AI adoption by sovereign nations like the EU and UAE, the US government's AI Action Plan from July 2025, and expected rate cuts in 2026. Q: Which stock is excluded from the positive earnings growth outlook? A: Tesla (TSLA) is excluded from the expectation that Magnificent 7 earnings will outperform the S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100. Q: What challenges did Tesla face in November? A: Tesla declined 6% due to price competition in the electric vehicle market that led to margin erosion pressures. This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Sembcorp Industries Enters Australian Energy Market via S$4.8bn Alinta Deal
Strategic Acquisition Overview Sembcorp Industries Ltd has announced its agreement to acquire Alinta Energy for S$4.8 billion in an all-cash transaction, marking a significant expansion into the Australian energy market. The acquisition will be funded through a bridging loan, with no equity fundraising required. This strategic move reflects Sembcorp's efforts to secure new growth opportunities amid challenges in traditional markets. The company has been seeking sustainable growth avenues amid diminishing opportunities in China and softer electricity spreads in Singapore. The potential listing of its Indian renewable energy assets could further dilute the company's growth trajectory, making the Australian market expansion particularly strategic. Company Profile and Market Position Sembcorp Industries operates as a leading energy and utilities company with a significant presence across multiple markets. Alinta Energy Asset Portfolio The acquisition of Alinta Energy brings substantial energy generation capacity to Sembcorp's portfolio. Alinta Energy operates 3.4 gigawatts of power generation capacity across Australia, with a diversified energy mix comprising 43% gas, 33% coal, 17% wind, and 7% solar generation. Additionally, the acquisition includes access to a development pipeline of 10.4 gigawatts of largely renewable capacity, providing significant future growth potential. Financial Impact and Investment Merits The acquisition demonstrates substantial financial benefits for Sembcorp Industries. On a trailing 12-month basis through June 2025, the transaction is expected to be 23% accretive to profit after tax and minority interests on a pro forma basis, excluding amortization of intangibles—post-acquisition, the enterprise value to EBITDA multiple drops modestly to 8.3 times. However, the acquisition will increase financial leverage, with net debt to EBITDA rising from 3.6 times to 4.6 times, representing an additional S$5.8 billion in net debt. The Australian energy market structure differs from Singapore's, featuring fewer long-term contracts, which may result in higher margin volatility. Research Recommendation and Outlook Phillip Securities Research maintains its BUY recommendation for Sembcorp Industries while adjusting their target price from S$7.90 to S$7.10. The price reduction reflects lowered Singapore electricity spread assumptions, with EBITDA and net profit forecasts reduced by 7% and 12% respectively. The Alinta acquisition has not been incorporated into current forecasts, pending shareholder approval and expected completion in the first half of 2026. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is the total value of Sembcorp's acquisition of Alinta Energy? A: Sembcorp Industries has agreed to acquire Alinta Energy for S$4.8 billion, to be paid fully in cash through a bridging loan facility. Q: What type of energy generation capacity does Alinta Energy operate? A: Alinta Energy operates 3.4 gigawatts of power generation capacity across Australia, with 43% gas, 33% coal, 17% wind, and 7% solar generation facilities. Q: How will the acquisition impact Sembcorp's financial performance? A: The acquisition is expected to be 23% accretive to profit after tax and minority interests on a trailing 12-month basis, while the EV/EBITDA ratio will drop modestly to 8.3 times post-acquisition. Q: What are the potential growth opportunities from this acquisition? A: The acquisition provides access to a development pipeline of 10.4 gigawatts of largely renewable capacity for future expansion opportunities. Q: How will the acquisition affect Sembcorp's debt levels? A: Net debt to EBITDA will increase from 3.6 times to 4.6 times, representing an additional S$5.8 billion in net debt following the acquisition. Q: What is Phillip Securities Research's recommendation and target price? A: Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation while reducing the target price from S$7.90 to S$7.10 due to lower Singapore electricity spread assumptions. Q: When is the acquisition expected to be completed? A: The acquisition requires shareholder approval and is expected to be completed in the first half of 2026. Q: What are the main risks associated with this acquisition? A: The Australian energy market has fewer long-term contracts compared to Singapore's market, which may lead to higher margin volatility for the combined entity. This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Singapore Banking Sector Sees Mixed Outlook Amid Rate Declines
Singapore's banking sector continues to navigate in a challenging interest rate environment, with Phillip Securities Research maintaining a NEUTRAL stance on the sector while highlighting both headwinds and opportunities ahead. Key Market Developments Recent data points to mixed conditions across the secor. November's 3-month Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA) declined 14 basis points month-on-month to 1.26%, marking the lowest level since July 2022 and representing a substantial 203 basis points year-on-year decrease. Despite the softer rate environment, loan growth momentum remained positive, with October 2025 figures showing 6.5% growth and year-to-date loans up 5.7% year-on-year. Banks continue to guide towards low to mid-single-digit growth expectations for the remainer of the year. On the deposit front, Current Account and Savings Account (CASA) balances rose 13% year-on-year, though the CASA ratio to total deposits dipped slightly to 19.4% in October 2025. Nevertheless, higher CASA balances serve as a tailwind for banks by helping to lower funding costs. Investment Outlook and Challenges The continued decline in interest rates across both Singapore and Hong Kong markets has pressured banks' net interest margins (NIMs), directly impacting net interest income and overall earnings. Phillip Securities Research expects earnings to decline in FY25, due to lower net interest income, despite anticipating that deposit rate cuts will benefit funding costs in the second half of 2025 and help ease NIM compression. Sector Recommendations and Preferences Within the sector, Phillip Securities Research upgraded OCBC from Neutral to ACCUMULATE, raising the target price to S$20.00 from S$17.00. This upgrade reflects adjustments to the terminal growth rate to 3% from 2% and the beta value from 1.2 to 1.1, recognising OCBC's strong wealth management growth and excess capital position. The research house expresses a preference for DBS, citing its fixed dividend policy, and OCBC, highlighting its strong wealth management growth and excess capital. Despite earnings headwinds, the sector's 5.5% dividend yield remains attractive, with capital return initiatives expected to continue in FY25. Share buyback programmes are expected to improve return on equity and earnings per share. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is the current outlook for Singapore's banking sector? A: Phillip Securities Research maintains a NEUTRAL stance on the sector, citing declining interest rates that are affecting banks' net interest margins and earnings, though dividend yields remain attractive at 5.5%. Q: How has loan growth performed in Singapore banks? A: Loan growth continues to climb with October 2025 showing 6.5% growth and year-to-date 2025 loans up 5.7% year-on-year, with banks guiding for low to mid-single digit growth. Q: What happened to interest rates in Singapore recently? A: November's 3-month SORA declined 14 basis points month-on-month to 1.26%, the lowest since July 2022, and fell 203 basis points year-on-year. Q: Which banks does Phillip Securities Research prefer and why? A: The research house prefers DBS for its fixed dividend policy and OCBC for its strong wealth management growth and excess capital position. Q: What changes were made to OCBC's rating and target price? A: OCBC was upgraded from Neutral to ACCUMULATE with the target price raised from S$17.00 to S$20.00, reflecting a higher terminal growth rate of 3% and lower beta of 1.1. Q: How are deposit trends affecting Singapore banks? A: CASA balances rose 13% year-on-year, but the CASA ratio to deposits dipped slightly to 19.4%, which serves as a tailwind by lowering funding costs for banks. Q: What is expected for bank earnings in FY25? A: Earnings are expected to decline in FY25 due to lower net interest income from compressed margins, though deposit rate cuts may help ease this pressure in the second half of 2025. This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Before the Year Ends: Key Financial Steps for a Confident 2026
As 2025 draws to a close, many of us naturally begin to reflect on the year thus far. Our milestones, the challenges we faced, and whether we achieved our set goals. Apart from that, this period is also a perfect time to take stock of our financial health. While taking a financial inventory may sound daunting, it does not have to be complicated. Think of it as a simple checklist or review that helps set the tone for a more confident 2026. 1. Review Your Policies & Protection Needs With the upcoming changes to Integrated Shield Plan (IP) riders, which were announced on 27 Nov 25, you may face higher out-of-pocket medical expenses in the future1. This is because new riders will no longer be able to cover the minimum deductible (the initial amount you must pay before insurance kicks in). While the cost of new riders is expected to decrease, these changes make it a good time to review your policies and make sure your needs are adequately met. Healthcare is, unfortunately, one of the largest and most unpredictable financial commitments we face; thus, it helps to start setting aside some funds for emergencies. 2. Strengthen Your Savings Have you taken that first step in opening a higher-interest-bearing account, or are you still keeping most of your funds in a basic savings account? Many banks today offer significantly higher interest rates when you meet certain criteria, like salary crediting into specific account types. This is a simple and low-effort way to let your savings grow a little faster. Beyond that, you may also consider short-term instruments like T-bills or fixed deposits to further strengthen your savings. However, as we are currently in a period of declining interest rates, relying solely on these options may no longer be sufficient. This is a good time to review your holdings and consider diversifying into other alternatives that can offer you more. 3. Do Not Invest On Impulse Gold and equities continue to be a popular choice among investors, but not everyone is comfortable with volatility and the risks that come with it. Nevertheless, they remain valuable instruments when managed effectively, and there are strategies you can use to help mitigate volatility and make your journey smoother. One approach you can consider is Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA), where you invest a fixed amount at regular intervals, regardless of the market price of an asset. Over time, this helps to cushion the impact of price volatility and, as the name suggests, averages out your entry cost. You can also consider building a diversified and balanced portfolio. While gold is trending at the moment, it is rarely wise to rely too heavily on a single asset. It is much safer to spread your investments rather than putting them all in one basket. Doing so makes your portfolio more resilient to market turbulence. Lastly, always keep yourself anchored by establishing realistic, long-term goals. Consistent and disciplined effort often matters more than timing the market. Avoid chasing trends or investing on impulse. Sustainable growth is cultivated over time; Rome wasn’t built in a day. 4. Attaining Your Retirement Goals A comfortable retirement is something we all hope for, whether you are only beginning to plan for it or you are already approaching that milestone. The year-end is always a perfect moment to pause, reflect, and evaluate your retirement preparedness. You can start by estimating how much monthly income you will realistically need in retirement. From there, assess whether your current and future income streams can sustain that lifestyle. Income streams can come from many avenues, but the most common and reliable ones will typically include: CPF Lifelong Income For the Elderly (CPF LIFE) payouts Dividends from your Investments Retirement / Savings Income Ideally, these income streams would be your perpetual sources, a stable and reliable form of income you have cultivated over the years. Always remember that retirement is not only about how much you save but also about ensuring your savings are structured to last for your entire lifetime. With factors such as rising inflation and healthcare costs, failing to make your income streams resilient is tantamount to risking financial insecurity in retirement. Start Today! Planning and organising your finances is an ongoing process, not a one-time task. A simple year-end review can give you the clarity and renewed motivation you need to step into 2026 with confidence. Whether it’s reviewing your policy coverage, adjusting your savings strategies, or strengthening your investment approach, any small step you take will help you move closer to your dream retirement. You don’t need to tackle everything at once; you just need to start. If you’re unsure where to begin or would like a second opinion on your current plans, we’re always happy to help. Best wishes, and may 2026 bring you clarity, progress, and confidence in your financial journey. Contributor: Claudia Tan Financial Services Director Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (A member of PhillipCapital) https://bit.ly/TTPclaudia References: [1] https://www.moh.gov.sg/newsroom/new-requirements-for-integrated-shield-plan-riders-to-strengthen-sustainability-of-private-health-insurance-and-address-rising-healthcare-costs/ Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Federal Reserve Delivers Third Rate Cut Amid Growing Internal Divisions
The Federal Reserve delivered its third consecutive interest rate cut, but the decision revealed significant internal tensions within the committee as monetary policymakers navigate an increasingly complex economic landscape. Rare Three-Way Split Signals Policy Uncertainty The 9-3 vote marked the first triple dissent since 2019, highlighting a widening divide among Fed officials. Governor Stephen Miran advocated a more aggressive 50-basis-point reduction, while Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee preferred maintaining current rates. This split underscores the challenging macro environment facing the central bank, with committee members holding divergent views on inflation trajectories and labour market risks. Labor Market Concerns Take Center Stage For the first time in this easing cycle, the Federal Open Market Committee explicitly acknowledged rising downside risks to employment. This represents a meaningful shift in the Fed's labour market assessment, as job growth has decelerated throughout the year and unemployment has edged higher. Recent economic indicators point to softer hiring conditions, even as inflation remains somewhat elevated above the Fed's target. Gradual Easing Path Ahead The December Summary of Economic Projections reinforces expectations of a shallow and measured easing cycle. The median federal funds rate is projected at 3.4% in 2026 and 3.1% in 2027, converging toward a longer-run neutral estimate of 3%. Growth expectations for 2026 were revised upward to 2.3% from the previously projected 1.8%. Unemployment is expected to stabilize around 4.4%-4.5%, while inflation is projected to return to the 2% target by 2028. Balance Sheet Policy Transition The Fed officially concluded its quantitative tightening programme, declaring that reserves have reached "ample" levels. Moving forward, the central bank will begin purchasing Treasury bills to maintain adequate reserve levels, marking a shift away from balance-sheet runoff to a neutral reserve-maintenance regime. This operational change aims to stabilise money-markets as non-reserve liabilities continue expanding. Additionally, the Fed also implemented several technical adjustments, lowering the interest rate on reserve balances to 3.65% and establishing new operational parameters for repo operations to support the updated policy stance. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What made this Fed meeting unusual compared to recent decisions? A: The 9-3 vote featured the first triple dissent since 2019, with Governor Stephen Miran favoring a 50bps cut while Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee preferred no change, highlighting internal disagreement. Q: How has the Fed's view of the labour market changed? A: The Committee placed clearer emphasis on the fact that downside risks to employment have risen, marking a meaningful shift as job gains have slowed, unemployment has edged higher, and hiring conditions have softened. Q: What does the Fed's economic outlook suggest for future rate cuts? A: The December projections signal a "slow glide" path with the median federal funds rate at 3.4% in 2026 and 3.1% in 2027, indicating a shallow and gradual easing cycle rather than aggressive cutting. Q: What changes occurred with the Fed's balance sheet policy? A: The Fed officially ended quantitative tightening, concluding that reserves have reached "ample" levels, and will begin purchasing T-bills to maintain reserve adequacy rather than continuing balance sheet runoff. Q: When does the Fed expect inflation to return to target? A: According to the projections, inflation is expected to return to the 2% target by 2028, while unemployment is projected to remain around 4.4%-4.5%. Q: What operational changes accompanied the rate decision? A: The Fed lowered the interest rate on reserve balances to 3.65%, set overnight repo operations at 3.75% and reverse repos at 3.50%, and will continue rolling maturing securities into short-dated bills. Q: How were growth expectations revised? A: Growth expectations for 2026 were revised upward to 2.3% from the previously projected 1.8% in September, suggesting a more optimistic economic outlook. This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
