Seasoned Equity Offering
In the world of finance and stock market investments, it is always about realising ways in which companies can raise more capital to expand, grow, or clear debt. A Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) is among the various methods such firms apply. An SEO offering often has implications that go a long way for the company and its shareholders. In this article, we will break down a seasoned equity offering, how it works, the different types of SEOs, and their impact on existing shareholders. We will focus on the U.S. and Singaporean markets, which are common bases for established companies to issue SEOs.
Table of Contents
- What is a Seasoned Equity Offering?
- Understanding Seasoned Equity Offering
- Benefits of Seasoned Equity Offering
- Disadvantages Seasoned Equity Offering
- Types of Seasoned Equity Offerings
- Impact of SEOs on Existing Shareholders
- Examples of Seasoned Equity Offering
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Seasoned Equity Offering?
A Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) is the issue of fresh shares by an already-listed company to the public to raise funds. In an SEO, there is no fresh issue of the company’s shares, as happens in an IPO, where a company first issues its shares to the public. Instead, an SEO is an offering of shares by companies already listed on the stock exchange. These firms use SEOS to raise more funds for diverse purposes, such as expanding operations, reducing debt, acquiring new assets, or improving liquidity.
In an SEO, the issuing company issues new shares to investors, usually at a price set during an offering process. Institutional or retail investors can buy these newly issued shares. An SEO can be structured in a number of ways based on the company’s objectives and current financial position.
SEOs can occur at any time but typically occur when a company needs capital after going public. Recently, companies like Tesla and Apple have conducted SEOs to finance innovation and growth in their industries.
Understanding Seasoned Equity Offering
A seasoned equity offering is how companies raise funds without increasing debt. In a nutshell, it enables them to float more shares and tap public investors for money. SEOs are different from IPO offerings primarily because listed companies offer them. In the U.S., this type of offering is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), while in Singapore, it is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Singapore Exchange (SGX).
The basic feature of SEOs is that they enable public companies that have already gone public to raise capital. Companies usually issue SEOs when they are growing, need to strengthen their finances, or invest in new projects that require a lot of capital.
Benefits of Seasoned Equity Offering
- Raising Capital: They enable companies to raise large amounts of capital without increasing their debt burden.
- Flexibility: The funds raised through SEOs can be used for various purposes, including acquisitions, debt refinancing, or operations expansion.
- Rapid Process: Compared to an IPO, an SEO is quicker since the company is already listed and thus less onerous in terms of regulatory requirements and paperwork.
Disadvantages Seasoned Equity Offering
- Dilution: The issuance of additional shares typically results in dilution of the ownership of existing shareholders.
- Market Reaction: If the market views the issue as a negative signal (an indicator of financial distress), the stock price may decline.
Types of Seasoned Equity Offerings
seasoned equity offerings can take several forms. Knowing the various types helps investors and companies determine which method best suits their needs.
Rights Offering:
Existing shareholders will have a chance to purchase these newly issued shares proportionally to their existing holdings by accepting this form of rights offering at the prescribed price or perhaps lower than its normal selling value. This will benefit existing investors so they don’t lose any stake in the business entity.
For instance, if a shareholder holds 100 shares in a firm making a rights issue, he may be able to purchase extra shares at a discount, meaning he would retain his shareholding percentage.
Benefits: Rights issues allow existing shareholders to continue holding the shares and prevent dilution if they buy the newly issued shares.
Public Offering
In a public offering, the company sells new shares directly to the market or to institutional investors, and existing shareholders are not given the chance to buy these new shares.
This type of offer can result in more dilution for current shareholders, as the total number of shares outstanding increases.
Benefits: Unless well managed, they dilute existing shareholders and tend to lower the share price.
Private Placement
The issuance of new shares to institutional or accredited investors other than the public is termed a private placement SEO.
It typically takes less time and has a lower regulatory threshold than a public offering. There is also potentially less market distraction to the issuing company’s operations.
Benefits: It involves relatively quicker and less complex fundraising that may be undertaken for strategic or specific investments that can be effectively made.
Risks: Placements are priced at a discount to the issue price, diluting existing shares.
At-the-Market Offering (ATM):
In an At-the-Market Offering, the corporation issues shares directly to the public in the market at prevailing prices during a certain period, as opposed to in one shot.
This approach decreases the shock in the stock price, which usually goes along with public issues of a bigger magnitude.
Benefits: This offering creates negligible market disruption because of progressively selling shares.
Risks: It takes more time to raise the needed capital than other offering methods.
Impact of SEOs on Existing Shareholders
The SEOS will have many essential effects on existing shareholders, and all these have to be understood prior to investing in any company conducting the SEO process.
Dilution of Ownership. The SEOs’ first significant impact on existing shareholders is probably the dilution factor. Dilution occurs due to the increase in the outstanding share capital brought by issuing new shares.
For example, suppose an investor holds 10% of a company, and the company issues 20% more shares. In that case, the investor’s percentage ownership will be reduced unless he or she participates in the offering.
Impact on Stock Price:
The effect of an SEO on stock prices is usually negative, especially when the market perceives the offering as a signal of financial distress or when it leads to substantial dilution of ownership.
However, in a situation where the raised capital is good for the firm to grow ahead—for instance, financing an acquisition project or important research—the price for the firm’s shares tends to move higher, especially over time.
Impact on Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Because of issuing new equity and increasing outstanding shares, SEO’s earnings per share declined. Other things are equal except when new money is generated proportionately, increasing earnings. Lower EPS can hurt investor sentiment, and the stocks may decline.
Voting Power
The non-participating shareholders in the offering could lose voting power as the increased number of issued shares increases the number of outstanding shares. This would be particularly significant for companies having a large institutional shareholder base.
Examples of Seasoned Equity Offering
U.S. Market Example
Tesla, Inc.: In 2020, Tesla conducted a seasoned equity offering that raised around $5 billion. The company sold additional shares in the market, which was seen as a cause for concern due to dilution. However, Tesla’s promising growth prospects and market position saw a rebound in the stock price after the offering. The funds were used to speed up product development and infrastructure expansion.
Singapore Market Example
SATS Ltd.: In 2020, SATS Ltd., a food and gateway services leader, completed a seasoned equity offering to enhance its balance sheet with much-needed capital during the COVID-19 pandemic. This allowed SATS to invest in its digital transformation and manage liquidity in times of uncertainty.
Conclusion
A Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO) is a powerful tool companies use to raise capital while maintaining their listing on a public exchange. An SEO is the most critical tool in corporate finance strategies both within the U.S. and the Singapore markets for funding expansion or paying off debts as well as opening new ventures. Still, there needs to be utmost consideration for shareholders on potential dilution, stock price changes, and impacts on voting power. Investor decisions within the stock market depend much on understanding the two types of SEOs and the implications involved.
Frequently Asked Questions
An SEO is the second time a publicly listed company issues shares to the public, while an IPO is the first time. While an IPO is a company’s maiden entry into the public markets, an SEO refers to how companies raise additional capital after they go public.
An SEO may result in a dilution of ownership for the existing shareholders. When a firm issues more shares, the ownership percentage of the existing shareholders decreases unless they participate in the offering.
Typically, SEOs experience dilution, especially if the offering is undertaken without a rights offering (that is, where existing shareholders can buy new shares to maintain their percentage ownership). However, rights offerings offer minimal efficiency in avoiding dilution since shareholders can buy shares in proportion to the holding.
SEOs offer companies the ability to raise capital without increasing their debt. They allow businesses to finance expansion, acquisitions, or investments in new projects. To investors, an SEO may be a chance to buy stock at a discount (in rights offerings).
In some cases, SEOs may require shareholder approval, especially in rights offerings or when the offering results in significant dilution. However, public offerings and private placements may not require shareholder approval if the board of directors has already authorised the issuance of new shares.
Related Terms
- Merger Arbitrage
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Callable Preferred Stock
- Growth Stocks
- Market maker
- Authorized Stock
- Dividend Discount Model
- Stock Shifts
- Price to Book
- Stock Price
- Consumer Stock
- Undervalued Stocks
- Tracking Stock
- Income stocks
- Hang Seng Index
- Merger Arbitrage
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Callable Preferred Stock
- Growth Stocks
- Market maker
- Authorized Stock
- Dividend Discount Model
- Stock Shifts
- Price to Book
- Stock Price
- Consumer Stock
- Undervalued Stocks
- Tracking Stock
- Income stocks
- Hang Seng Index
- Rally
- Ticker Symbol
- Defensive stock
- Earnings Guidance
- Wire house broker
- Stock Connect
- Options expiry
- Payment Date
- Treasury Stock Method
- Reverse stock splits
- Ticker
- Restricted strict unit
- Gordon growth model
- Stock quotes
- Shadow Stock
- Margin stock
- Dedicated Capital
- Whisper stock
- Voting Stock
- Deal Stock
- Microcap stock
- Capital Surplus
- Multi-bagger Stocks
- Shopped stock
- Secondary stocks
- Screen stocks
- Quarter stock
- Orphan stock
- One-decision stock
- Repurchase of stock
- Stock market crash
- Half stock
- Stock options
- Stock split
- Foreign exchange markets
- Stock Market
- FAANG stocks
- Unborrowable stock
- Joint-stock company
- Over-the-counter stocks
- Watered stock
- Zero-dividend preferred stock
- Bid price
- Authorised shares
- Auction markets
- Market capitalisation
- Arbitrage
- Market capitalisation rate
- Garbatrage
- Autoregressive
- Stockholder
- Penny stock
- Noncyclical Stocks
- Hybrid Stocks
- Large Cap Stocks
- Mid Cap Stocks
- Common Stock
- Preferred Stock
- Small Cap Stocks
- Earnings Per Share (EPS)
- Diluted Earnings Per Share
- Dividend Yield
- Cyclical Stock
- Blue Chip Stocks
- Averaging Down
Most Popular Terms
Other Terms
- Compound Yield
- Brokerage Account
- Discretionary Accounts
- Industry Groups
- Growth Rate
- Green Bond Principles
- Gamma Scalping
- Funding Ratio
- Free-Float Methodology
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- Floating Dividend Rate
- Flight to Quality
- Real Return
- Protective Put
- Perpetual Bond
- Option Adjusted Spread (OAS)
- Non-Diversifiable Risk
- Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)
- Income Bonds
- Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
- Flash Crash
- Equity Carve-Outs
- Cost of Equity
- Cost Basis
- Deferred Annuity
- Cash-on-Cash Return
- Earning Surprise
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Bubble
- Beta Risk
- Bear Spread
- Asset Play
- Accrued Market Discount
- Ladder Strategy
- Junk Status
- Interest-Only Bonds (IO)
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- Inflation Hedge
- Industry Groups
- Incremental Yield
- Industrial Bonds
- Income Statement
- Holding Period Return
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Hedge Effectiveness
- Flat Yield Curve
- Fallen Angel
- Exotic Options
- Execution Risk
- Exchange-Traded Notes
Know More about
Tools/Educational Resources
Markets Offered by POEMS
Read the Latest Market Journal
ETF Market Review: Most ETFs up in November; gold expected to extend recent gains
November Performance Overview The ETF market delivered mixed results in November, with most funds posting positive returns, though notable exceptions occurred. The standout performer was the oil-tracking ETF (XOP), which surged 5.6% during the month, benefitting from momentum in the energy sector. However, not all sectors shared this success: the Bitcoin-tracking ETF (BITO) declined 17.6%, while the Hang Seng Index ETF (HK.2828) declined 0.3%. Current Market Trends Analysis Technical analysis reveals distinct trend patterns across major asset classes heading into December. The S&P 500, US Treasury Bonds, Gold, and Singapore Equities are all maintaining strong upward trajectories, suggesting continued investor confidence in these sectors. Meanwhile, Oil and the Hang Seng Index have entered range consolidation phases, indicating potential sideways movement as markets digest recent gains and losses. Bitcoin stands out as the only primary asset class currently in a clear downtrend, reflecting ongoing volatility in the cryptocurrency space. December Market Expectations Looking ahead to December, market analysts anticipate divergent performance across ETF categories. Gold-tracking ETFs are expected to extend their recent gains, potentially benefitting from continued safe-haven demand and favourable macroeconomic conditions. This positive outlook for precious metals contrasts sharply with expectations for other major asset classes. Several prominent ETF categories, including those tracking the S&P 500, US Treasury Bonds, Bitcoin, and the Hang Seng Index, are projected to experience pullbacks in December. This anticipated correction may reflect profit-taking and seasonal market adjustments as investors reposition portfolios ahead of year-end. Reference Material: ETF Monthly: November 2025 - Gold to outperform in December Share Target Price - POEMS Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Thai Beverage PLC: Challenging Operating Environment Amid External Pressures
Company Overview Thai Beverage PLC (ThaiBev) is a leading beverage company in Southeast Asia, operating primarily in the spirits and beer segments. The company maintains significant market positions in Thailand and Vietnam through its beer operations, while also commanding a strong presence in the regional spirits market. Below-Expectation Financial Performance ThaiBev's recent financial results fell short of analyst projections. For FY25, revenue reached only 92% of forecats, while profit after tax and minority interest (PATMI) came in at 86% of expectations. The company's spirits division was particularly weak in the second half of FY25, with PATMI declining 3% year over year. Most concerning was the sharp 11% year-over-year contraction in volumes during the fourth quarter of FY25. The primary driver behind this underperformance was the border dispute with Cambodia, which resulted in a massive exodus of migrant workers from Thailand. This development caused significant disruption to supply chains and contributed to a decline in volumes across ThaiBev's operations. Mixed Segment Performance Despite these challenges, ThaiBev's beer segment demonstrated resilience with strong earnings growth in the second half of FY25. This improvement was attributed to higher contributions from Thailand operations, which reduced minority-interest impacts, and by aggressive cost-cutting measures in distribution and administrative expenses. However, beer volumes still declined 1.2% year over year in 2H25, primarily due to weakness at Sabeco following price increases. Investment Outlook and Recommendation Phillip Securities Research maintains an ACCUMULATE recommendation for ThaiBev, while lowering the target price to S$0.53 from S$0.56. The revised valuation reflects a 22% reduction in FY26 earnings estimates due to lower revenue projections and a 12x FY26 price-to-earnings ratio, which aligns with the company’s four-year average forward PE. Despite significant forecast cuts, analysts expect earnings growth in FY26 as management is anticipated to align operating expenses with reduced volumes. The investment case is further supported by potential gross margin expansion opportunities driven by substantial declines in input costs, including packaging, malt, and molasses prices. However, ThaiBev continues to face a challenging consumer spending environment, recently exacerbated by flooding conditions that may further pressure near-term performance. Reference link: https://www.poems.com.sg/stock-research/TBV.SG/ Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
BRC Asia Ltd: Strong Performance Drives 36% Profit Growth
Company Overview and Market Position BRC Asia Ltd operates as a leading steel reinforcement solutions provider in the construction industry, specialising in steel rebar delivery and related services. The company serves as a critical supplier to Singapore's construction sector, supporting major infrastructure and residential development projects across the region. Strong Financial Performance Highlights BRC Asia delivered impressive financial results with adjusted profit after tax and minority interests (PATMI) surging 36% year-on-year in the second half of FY25. Full year revenue and adjusted PATMI came in at 96% and 101% of forecasts, respectively, demonstrating solid execution against expectations. Excluding the S$16.5 million disposal gains on associates from 2H24 and other one-off items, the underlying business performance showed remarkable strength. The standout performance was driven primarily by an estimated 34% year-on-year increase in steel rebar delivery volumes, marking the highest volume growth since 2H23. This surge reflects stronger construction project offtake across BRC Asia's key markets, indicating robust demand conditions in the construction sector. Robust Order Book Supports Future Growth BRC Asia's business outlook appears particularly strong, supported by a substantial S$1.9 billion order book. This represents a 36% year-on-year increase and is 42% above the company's five-year historical average. The significant boost stems from S$570 million in T5 contracts awarded during 3Q25, providing substantial revenue visibility for the coming periods. Steel rebar delivery volumes are expected to continue ramping up over subsequent quarters as project offtake strengthens, with peak volumes anticipated in 2026-27. Key growth drivers include HDB BTO buildout programmes, the T5 project ramp-up, and expansion contracts for the Marina Bay Sands Integrated Resort which are expected to be tendered to main contractors by year-end. Investment Recommendation and Valuation Phillip Securities Research has upgraded BRC Asia to BUY from NEUTRAL, raising the target price to S$5.10 from the previous S$4.10. The revision reflects a 15% increase in FY26 adjusted PATMI forecasts, driven by higher expected delivery volumes. The target price incorporates valuations rolled over to FY26/27, with weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and growth rate assumptions at 10% and 2.5% respectively. The stock also offers an attractive FY26 dividend yield of 4.8%, enhancing its investment appeal. Reference link:https://www.poems.com.sg/stock-research/BRCC.SG/ Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The ILP Debate: Why Singaporeans Struggle With Financial Product Decisions
Recent discussions in Parliament and data from the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre (FiDReC) have shed light on a deeper issue: many Singaporeans struggle to make confident decisions when it comes to choosing financial products — especially more complex ones. At a glance ILP complaints have surged: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) reported that FIDReC handled 211 investment-linked policy (ILP) complaints in 2024 — a sharp increase from 55 complaints in 2023 1. The ILP debate is longstanding: Some say ILPs cost too much and are too complex; others defend their benefits, like tax and estate planning flexibility. But the real issue lies elsewhere: many people simply do not have a clear, structured way of evaluating which product suits them. A solution exists: The Facilitating Decision-Making (FDM) methodology, first introduced in the Insurance and Financial Practitioners Association of Singapore Journal, offers a practical, client-friendly framework that helps investors and advisers make decisions together in a clearer, more transparent way. Why ILPs Are Back in the Spotlight Investment-linked policies (ILPs) have always been debated, but a recent rise in sales, followed by a significant spike in complaints, pushed the topic back into the public spotlight and into Parliament. The events culminated in a public exchange between two industry voices, financial educator Christopher Tan and adviser Trishita De Mello. Christopher contended that ILPs combine high costs with complex structures, making them unsuitable for most investors. Mello, however, countered that Christopher’s argument unfairly misleads and oversimplifies ILPs. Both arguments have their own merit. But beneath the debate lies a simpler truth: many investors simply cannot connect what they read in product disclosures with how the product actually works in real life. Even though ILPs made up only a small portion of all policies sold in 2024, the surge in complaints shows that many Singaporeans still misunderstand what they are buying 2. This is not just a “product problem” — it’s a decision-making problem. Why Financial Decisions Feel So Hard Part of the challenge is that today’s suitability checks rely heavily on human judgement. They help rule out clearly unsuitable products, but they do not give people a structured way to compare options. This means: advisers try their best to guide clients using experience and intuition clients often struggle to understand trade-offs between one plan and another both sides may walk away with different interpretations of the same explanation For example: It’s easy to say term insurance is not suitable for funding a child’s university fees. But if a client asks, “Should I pick an endowment plan? An ILP? Or invest separately?”, there’s no standard, easy-to-follow way to examine the differences. As products get more complex, so do misunderstandings 3. A Framework for Clarity: FDM This is where the Facilitating Decision-Making (FDM) methodology comes in. FDM provides the structure that many clients and advisers have been missing. FDM takes what good advisers already do in their heads — comparing factors, weighing trade-offs, and explaining choices — and turns it into a transparent process that clients can clearly follow. The methodology involves: identifying meaningful and relevant factors such as potential returns, risk, liquidity, tax implications, legal considerations and client specific requirement such as ESG or Shariah compliance assigning weights to each factor, forcing both client and financial adviser to prioritise trade-offs scoring potential strategies such as ILPs, term-plus-investment combinations, or pure fund platforms — on the identified factors on a scale of 0 to 10, with financial advisers providing a rationale for each score While the ratings may be inherently subjective, each one can be accompanied by a brief explanation from the financial adviser outlining the rationale. The sum product scores are then tallied to see how closely each option aligns with what the client actually values. This transparent and reviewable framework fosters trust between both parties, invites challenges or clarification, and provides clients with meaningful co-ownership of the process. What Financial Planning Often Misses FDM also acknowledges that the best strategy can change over time. Market shifts and evolving client priorities mean that product suitability is contextual, hence there is no ‘best plan of all time’; only the ‘best at that point in time’. With a structured process like FDM, clients are not tied to a one-time decision. Instead, planning becomes an ongoing partnership where decisions can be reviewed and updated using the same transparent framework. A Call for Clearer Conversations The recent scrutiny around ILPs is not just about ILPs themselves. It reflects a deeper industry challenge: helping clients understand how recommendations are made. A structured approach like FDM can elevate industry clarity by ensuring recommendations can be explained, reviewed, and improved over time. It empowers both advisers and clients to look beyond product features and focus on what truly matters — clarity, confidence, and informed decision-making. The Takeaway: The Best Plan Is the One You Understand Financial planning does not need to feel intimidating. When both adviser and client follow a clear framework, decisions become easier, clearer, and more aligned with real-life goals. Products may change. Markets may change. Life will certainly change. But with a structured approach to decision-making, you can always find the “best plan for you — at this point in time”. Contributor: Isaac Fang, CFA Portfolio Manager (Dual Licence) Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (A member of PhillipCapital) http://bit.ly/TTPisaac References: [1] https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/parliamentary-replies/2025/written-reply-to-parliamentary-question-on-investment-linked-policies [2] https://www.fidrec.com.sg/_entity/annotation/7aae5aed-95a7-ef11-b8e9-6045bd22652a [3] https://www.straitstimes.com/business/concerns-raised-over-investment-linked-plans-as-demand-for-them-goes-up-in-singapore [4] https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion-features/investment-linked-insurance-products-complexity-label-long-time-coming Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Simple but Powerful: Strategies Behind DCA and DVA
1. Introduction When is the right time to invest? The truth is, timing the market is difficult, even for professionals. That’s why systematic investing strategies like Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) and Dollar Value Averaging (DVA) are popular. These approaches take the guesswork out of investing, helping you stay consistent and focused on long-term growth. In this article, we’ll explain how you can apply DCA and DVA to your own investment journey. 2. What is Dollar-Cost Averaging? DCA is the investment strategy of investing a fixed amount of money at regular intervals, regardless of the price or market conditions. Let’s look at an example of the results of investing US$500 at the end of each month in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) from Jan to Aug 2025: Month Price (US$) Investment (US$) Jan 607.5 500 Feb 585.56 500 Mar 549.83 500 Apr 547.57 500 May 588.93 500 Jun 617.38 500 Jul 639.46 500 Aug 647.47 500 Dollar Cost Average (DCA) Chart As of 25 Sep 2025, the market price stands around US$657.94, while the average cost price at month-end based on the above DCA example is US$597.96, registering an approximate 10% growth on the US$4,000 invested. By spreading your investments over time, DCA reduces the risk of investing all your money at the wrong moment. It also encourages discipline, since contributions are made consistently regardless of short-term market fluctuations. This strategy is especially suitable for investors who prefer a straightforward, recurring approach that works well with a fixed monthly budget, without needing to monitor the market closely. Benefits of DCA: Reduces the risk of investing all at once at the wrong time Encourages discipline with consistent contributions Simple to implement, especially for investors with a fixed monthly budget 3. What is Dollar-Value Averaging? DVA takes a more active approach. Instead of investing a fixed amount each time, contributions are adjusted based on market price. DVA adjusts contributions based on market performance—investing more when prices are low and less when prices are high—helping you to take advantage of market swings. Applying this method to the earlier example of investing in the SPY from Jan to Aug 2025, the results would look like this: Month Price ($) Investment ($) Shares Bought Jan 607.5 500 0.823 Feb 585.56 600 1.024 Mar 549.83 800 1.455 Apr 547.57 900 1.643 May 588.93 500 0.849 Jun 617.38 300 0.485 Jul 639.46 200 0.312 Aug 647.47 200 0.308 Dollar Cost Average (DCA) Chart Likewise, as of 25 Sep 2025, the market price of SPY is approximately US$657.94, while the average cost per share is US$580.10, representing a total position of 6.899 shares. With a total investment of US$4,000, this corresponds to an approximate 13.48% return. A noticeable decrease in share purchases during periods of strong upward price momentum. This strategy is particularly suitable for investors who prefer a performance-sensitive approach and are comfortable with variable contribution amounts. Benefits of DVA: Adjusts contributions based on market conditions: buy more when prices are low, less when prices are high Potentially higher returns than DCA if consistently applied Suitable for investors comfortable with variable contributions and active portfolio management 4. Pros and Cons of the Different Strategies Strategy Pros Cons Dollar Cost Average (DCA) Simple and consistent; reduces emotional decisions May underperform in steadily rising markets (opportunity cost) Dollar Value Average (DVA) More responsive to market swings; potentially higher returns Requires monitoring and flexible cash flow; more complex 5. Conclusion Both investment strategies provide a structured way to invest consistently and remove the stress and uncertainty of trying to time the market. Ultimately, your choice between DCA and DVA depends on your personal financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment goals. If you prefer a hands-off, steady approach, DCA may be the right fit. If you are comfortable with actively responding to market fluctuations and seeking to optimise returns, DVA could offer additional growth potential. Both strategies reinforce the fundamental principle of disciplined, long-term investing: consistency matters more than timing. By sticking to a systematic plan—whether through DCA or DVA — investors can navigate market ups and downs with greater confidence, gradually building a portfolio that supports their individual long-term financial goals. Check out our other articles if you’re interested in learning more about fractional shares. Visit our website or contact our dedicated Night Desk team at globalnight@phillip.com.sg or (+65) 6531 1225. Start investing smarter with POEMS today — open an account and trade the US markets now! Open an Account Now! Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Mooncakes: The Hidden Environmental Cost of Gifting
Every year during the Mid-Autumn Festival, many homes across Asia are filled with colourful mooncake boxes. Some are lavishly designed, embossed with gold foil, and often heavier than the pastries they protect. Crafted to impress and symbolise prosperity, they serve as tokens of appreciation in both corporate and personal exchanges. Yet after the celebration ends, many of these boxes end up discarded, barely used and seldom recycled. This seemingly harmless tradition reflects a broader tension between aesthetic excess and sustainable responsibility. For investors, the discarded mooncake box offers profound Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) lessons that extend far beyond the packaging industry. The first lesson lies in the environmental cost of aesthetic indulgence. A typical premium mooncake box is made from layered materials, including coated paper, plastic inserts, metallic embellishments, and magnetic clasps, making it nearly impossible to recycle efficiently. According to Bloomberg, the popularity of mooncakes and their elaborate packaging is driving China’s rising demand for plastics, with polyethylene output nearly doubling since 2018 and packaging equipment production increasing by 32.2% this year. [1] Similar patterns are observed in Singapore, where elaborate packaging has become a competitive differentiator among brands. From an ESG investment standpoint, this issue is best viewed through the lens of resource efficiency and the circular economy. Excessive packaging contributes to higher waste generation and increased Scope 3 emissions, highlighting the importance of responsible consumption and production as outlined in UN Sustainable Development Goal 12. For investors, this underscores the need to assess companies based on measurable sustainability outcomes—such as energy efficiency ratios, waste reduction targets, carbon disclosure scores, and supply chain transparency—rather than appearances alone. The second ESG dimension is the social factor. It emerges when we consider why companies continue producing such elaborate packaging. The answer lies in consumer psychology and societal norms. Many consumers perceive luxury packaging as a proxy for quality or sincerity. In the corporate gifting culture of Asia, presentation often outweighs practicality. This social expectation drives firms to overproduce, even when executives acknowledge the waste involved. For investors, this highlights how social sentiment shapes corporate ESG behaviour. Companies respond to consumer values, and when those values shift, capital flows follow. In particular, evolving preferences toward sustainable alternatives highlight potential transition risks for companies that are gradually adapting their packaging and product offerings. Businesses that align with this growing demand for sustainability are better positioned to maintain market share and support long-term profitability. For example, in recent years, sustainable packaging companies such as DS Smith (UK) and Huhtamäki (Finland) have outperformed traditional peers, benefiting from global consumer preference for biodegradable materials. [2] The discarded mooncake boxes, therefore, are not just environmental waste but also a social signal. It is evidence of a misalignment between consumer behaviour and sustainability awareness. As younger generations grow increasingly sustainability-conscious, demand for minimalist, eco-friendly products will expand. Firms that fail to adapt may face reputational and financial risks. The governance aspect of ESG relates to how companies balance short-term marketing appeal with long-term sustainability goals. Approving costly, non-recyclable packaging might signal weak sustainability oversight or poor board alignment with ESG principles. When companies prioritise optics over impact, it suggests governance complacency. For investors, governance quality is therefore a key indicator of whether ESG initiatives are genuine or merely performative. As global regulators, from the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to Singapore’s mandatory climate disclosures, tighten standards, weak governance will translate directly into financial penalties and reputational damage. The mooncake box thus symbolises ESG immaturity: decisions made without integrating environmental and social responsibility into corporate frameworks. The broader takeaway for investors is discernment. This involves distinguishing intrinsic value from cosmetic appeal. Just as consumers are drawn to the shimmering box rather than the mooncake’s quality, investors can be seduced by ESG branding that lacks operational depth. According to MSCI’s 2024 ESG Trends report, over 60% of global funds labelled sustainable had no measurable decarbonization strategy. [3] Sustainable investing must be data-driven, focusing on tangible performance indicators such as emissions intensity, renewable energy use, and board diversity. Ultimately, the discarded mooncake box is symbolic of humanity’s sustainability paradox, illustrating our instinct to value appearance over essence. Yet, in a hopeful turn of events, several confectionery and packaging firms are now adopting biodegradable materials, reusable tins, or digital gifting models that reduce waste entirely. Brands like Maxim’s and Mei-Xin have begun introducing recyclable paper packaging, while newer entrants market minimalist boxes that position environmental care as part of their brand identity. These shifts demonstrate how sustainability, when aligned with brand equity, can yield both financial and reputational dividends. Investors should recognise that ESG investing is not philanthropy. It is, in fact, risk-adjusted capitalism. Companies that anticipate and mitigate environmental and social risks consistently outperform those that react too late. The mooncake box, then, becomes both a cautionary symbol and a call to action: to demand substance over spectacle, long-term stewardship over short-term appeal, and responsibility over reputation. As the glitter fades and the boxes pile up, the true investors are those who see lessons in the waste by understanding that sustainability begins not in grand gestures but in small, deliberate choices. Keen to explore how sustainable investing can make a lasting impact? Learn more at phillipfunds.com/sustainable-investing. Contributor: Kenneth Chan Wealth Manager Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (A member of PhillipCapital) https://bit.ly/kennethchanwb Appendix: [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-10-08/luxury-mooncakes-won-t-go-away-nor-will-plastic-waste [2] https://time.com/collection/worlds-most-sustainable-companies-2024/ [3] Sustainability and Climate Trends to Watch Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Why Idle Cash Attracts Scammers & How to Beat Them
You may come across news about scams on your social media feeds. Recent headlines such as “Scam victims in Singapore lost $456m in the first half of 2025” raise alarm. From investment fraud to phishing emails and fake trading apps, online scams are on the rise. Many of these schemes prey on people with idle cash, basically – money sitting in their bank account without any active management. Common examples of scams include fake “high return” investment platforms promising 10-20% per month, social media scams where strangers solicit “joint investments”, and insurance premiums scams, where callers pose as insurers, claiming that you have “outstanding premiums” to pay or risk a policy lapse. When “Safe” Investments Turn Out to Be Scams Someone close to me once fell for a scheme that seemed harmless at first. The scammers convinced him that he could “book hotel rooms” online as an investment. The pitch sounded safe: invest some money, wait for tourists to check in, and then receive both your capital and profit when they check out. It sounded good, but of course, there were no hotels, no tourists and no returns. Fortunately, he didn’t lose everything, but the stress and the near-miss experience were painful reminders that scams don’t just target the greedy, but also prey on the trusting, the busy and anyone with idle funds seeking an opportunity. Recently, a client called to check if she had any outstanding premiums. She had received a call demanding immediate payment or risk lapsing her policy. Fortunately, she was aware of such scams and contacted me before making any payments. However, this type of scheme can be convincing, as most Singaporeans own some form of insurance, making the scam appear genuine. Here are some important reminders: 1. Legitimate insurers will never ask for your PIN or bank login details. 2. Premium payments should always be made through official company channels. 3. The best safeguard is to schedule annual reviews with your trusted financial advisor, so you’re always clear on which policies you have and when your premiums are due. Even if you do not fall for scams, idle funds carry another silent risk — underutilisation. Cash sitting in a bank account and earning little to no returns is especially vulnerable in today’s high-inflation environment. You might think idle money is “safe”, but in reality, it’s either exposed to scams or quietly losing purchasing power. This is where SMART Park makes a difference. Once you have opted in to SMART Park - Excess Funds Facility and transfer the money into your POEMS account, the funds will automatically be placed into the money market fund. Your cash then generates daily returns, which you can conveniently view from the POEMS Mobile 3 app. Enjoy full flexibility — your funds in SMART Park stay liquid and can be accessed anytime you need them. Simply submit a withdrawal request, and you should receive the funds within 1 working day. This adds an additional layer of security before you decide how to use your funds. Think of SMART park as a secure parking lot: instead of leaving your “car” in a dark alley (where scams lurk), you're parking it in a well-lit and guarded facility. In short, SMART Park is low risk, liquid and generates better returns. Scams often thrive on two things: greed—chasing unrealistic returns, and inattention—ignoring idle money or losing track of your insurance details. By parking your funds in SMART park and staying connected with your advisors, you address both risks: avoiding the lure of risky schemes while letting your money work for you safely and automatically. In today’s world, protecting your wealth is not just about steering clear of scams; it’s also about ensuring your cash isn’t left idle and unproductive. With SMART Park, you can be confident that your funds are managed and are growing steadily in the background. Often, the most harmless-looking attempts by scammers can cause the biggest damage. The smarter choice is to keep your cash somewhere both secure and productive. Ask your advisor today how SMART Park can make your idle cash work for you! Contributor: Elin Chee Financial Services Manager Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (A member of PhillipCapital) http://bit.ly/TTPelin Appendix: [1] https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/scam-victims-in-spore-lose-record-1-1-billion-in-2024-highest-number-of-cases-ever-reported Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Night Owls and Early Birds: A Guide to Extended Hours Trading
Introduction Extended-hours trading refers to buying and selling securities outside regular trading hours. Unlike standard trading sessions, these transactions are executed primarily through Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs), which facilitate trades when traditional exchanges are closed. Key Takeaways Two Sessions: Extended-hours trading in the US consists of two sessions — pre-market (4:00 am to 9:30 am ET) and post-market (4:00 pm to 8:00 pm ET). Market Indicator: Activity during these sessions often provides early signals for the regular trading day, though participation is typically lower, resulting in reduced liquidity. News Impact: Extended-hours trading is especially useful for reacting to breaking news, earnings releases, and merger announcements, many of which occur outside standard market hours. Risks & Volatility: Prices can swing more sharply during these sessions due to reduced trading volume and wider spreads. As a result, extended-hours activity may not always reflect the true momentum of the broader market. What is Extended-Hours Trading? Extended-hours trading is exactly what it sounds like — trading that takes place outside of the US market’s official opening hours. It is divided into two sessions: the pre-market (4:00 am to 9:30 am ET) and the post-market (4:00 pm to 8:00 pm ET). Pre-market activity often provides early clues about how stocks might perform once the market officially opens. While trading volume is generally lower during this period, significant changes in price and volume can hint at potential market direction and investor sentiment. Similarly, the post-market session reflects how investors react to news and earnings announcements released by many highly traded companies after the closing bell. This activity can offer insights into overall market sentiment and may influence expectations for the next trading day. Why Trade in Extended-Hours? 1. Opportunities for Early Reactions to News and Announcements Important news — such as earnings reports, financial results, or merger and acquisition news — is typically made before the market opens or after it closes. Extended-hours trading gives investors the chance to respond immediately, rather than waiting for the opening bell. Key economic data releases, such as jobs reports and inflation figures, also tend to come out around 8:30 am ET, during pre-market hours. In times of heightened volatility, extended sessions are often the first to reflect breaking news, allowing investors to adjust their positions quickly. Likewise, announcements made during post-market hours can trigger sharp price swings and significant gaps from the previous close. For example, Oracle (ORCL.US) surged more than 30% in post-market trading following news of a deal with OpenAI. Yahoo Historical Price on ORCL.US Though not as drastic, these movements after earnings reports or stock exchange filings are quite common. An example is when Coinbase (COIN.US) fell about 6% after its Q2 2025 earnings release. CNBC Reporting on Coinbase (COIN.US) Q2 Results 2. Gauge for breakouts or breakdowns during normal trading hours The price range of a stock during extended-hours trading can provide traders with insight into its support and resistance levels during regular hours, as well as potential breakouts or breakdowns. Changes in prices and trading volumes during these hours can foreshadow broader market movements throughout the day. 3. Access to longer trading hours Extended-hours trading allows investors to place trades immediately to manage their positions without for the market to open. This offers greater flexibility and convenience, as the trading window is longer. Traders restricted to regular trading hours may have to limit their strategies accordingly. Monitoring extended-hour activity also aids in risk management and informed trade positioning. Engaging in extended-market trading can offer opportunities for a timely entry or exit, giving investors a potential edge when the regular market resumes. Risks in Extended-Market trading 1. Lower Liquidity and Wider Spreads In extended hours trading, there are usually fewer buy and sell orders compared to regular market hours. This lower activity makes it difficult to buy or sell at your desired price. Your order may only be partially filled, or not filled at all. Fewer trades and higher volatility can also cause wider bid-ask spreads and larger price gaps between buyers and sellers. 2. Risk of Higher Volatility Prices can move more sharply during extended hours than during the regular session. This increased volatility means your order might not be fully executed, or it may be completed at a less favourable price. 3. Risk of Unlinked Markets Different extended-hours trading systems may display varying prices for the same security. Because these systems are not always interconnected, you might receive a less competitive price on one platform compared to another. 4. Risk of News Announcements Important company or market news is often released outside regular trading hours. Such announcements can cause sudden and sharp price movements during extended sessions, making it harder to trade at expected prices. What are the differences between extended-market and regular trading? Characteristics Extended Hours Regular Liquidity and volume Low High Bid-ask spread Wide Narrow Susceptible to higher or lower price gaps (refer to chart A above) Yes Generally no Price movements Prices are determined by a smaller group of investors, which may be heavily influenced by market news. (e.g. earnings release) Proper supply and demand dynamics determine price movements, ensuring orderly trading conditions. Market participants Predominantly institutional investors Both institutional and retail investors The table above captures the main differences between extended-market and regular trading sessions. Can I trade in the extended-hours market? How? Yes, you can! US extended-hours market prices on POEMS are available from 4:00 am to 9:30 am ET and 4:00 pm. to 8:00 pm. ET. You may refer to the table below to see the corresponding time in Singapore. Pre-market start time Pre-market end time Regular market start time Regular market end time Post-market start time Post-market end time US Eastern Standard Time (EST) 04:00 09:30 09:30 16:00 16:00 08:00 Singapore time (daylight saving) 16:00 21:30 21:30 04:00 04:00 08:00 Singapore time (non-daylight saving) 17:00 22:30 22:30 05:00 05:00 09:00 Extended-market orders can be placed starting from 4:00 am ET and remain valid until the close of the post-market session at 8:00 pm ET. Quotes for extended-market trading are only available during these hours. Any unfilled orders will automatically be carried forward into the next regular trading session. To begin trading in the extended market, click here. If you have any further questions, please visit our FAQ on US pre-market trading. Visit our website or contact our dedicated Night Desk team at globalnight@phillip.com.sg or (+65) 6531 1225. Start investing smarter with POEMS today — open an account and trade the US markets now! Open an Account Now! Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
