Cover Order
Grasping and applying different trading strategies is vital for achieving success in financial markets. Cover Orders, in particular, are a favored approach that provides a combination of risk management and profit opportunities. These orders serve as an effective tool for traders aiming to maneuver through financial markets with assurance. By comprehending the workings and advantages of Cover Orders, investors can refine their trading strategies and effectively reach their financial objectives.
Table of Contents
What is Cover Order?
A Cover Order is a trading strategy that enables investors to place an order in the stock market while also setting a stop-loss order to limit potential losses. This dual arrangement provides traders with a safety net, reducing their risk when entering the market.
When executing a Cover Order, traders define the target price for buying or selling a security and establish a specific stop-loss level. This stop-loss serves as protection, ensuring that losses are minimized if the market moves against them. Additionally, Cover Orders give traders leverage, allowing them to increase their market exposure while using only a portion of their capital. This aspect is especially beneficial for those looking to maximize profit potential while maintaining controlled risk levels.
Understanding Cover Order
Cover Orders operate on the principle of leverage, enabling traders to take larger positions with a relatively smaller capital outlay. By setting a predefined stop-loss level, traders can protect their investments from adverse market conditions.
The beauty of Cover Orders lies in their simplicity and effectiveness. Traders can confidently execute their desired trades, knowing that their downside risk is capped. This approach appeals to both seasoned traders and beginners, providing a level playing field in the dynamic world of financial markets. Understanding Cover Orders empowers traders to navigate the complexities of trading with greater control and efficiency, ultimately leading to more informed investment decisions and enhanced profitability.
Benefits of Cover Order
Cover Orders offer several advantages, including:
Risk Management: Cover Orders provide a robust risk management framework, allowing traders to limit potential losses. By setting a predefined stop-loss level, investors can protect their capital from significant market downturns.
Leverage: Embracing Cover Orders enables traders to leverage their positions effectively. With a relatively smaller capital outlay, investors can access larger trading positions, thereby maximizing profit potential while adhering to risk tolerance levels.
Efficiency: Cover Orders streamline the trading process, offering traders operational efficiency. By combining market orders with stop-loss orders, investors can execute their trading strategies seamlessly, eliminating the need for constant monitoring and manual intervention.
Flexibility: These orders offer flexibility in trading approaches, catering to a diverse range of investment objectives and risk appetites. Whether pursuing short-term gains or long-term growth, Cover Orders empower traders to adapt to evolving market conditions.
Types of Cover Order
Cover Orders can be classified into several types:
- Buy Cover Order: A Buy Cover Order allows traders to place a purchase order for a security while setting a predefined stop-loss level. When placing this order, traders specify both the target purchase price and the stop-loss level. For instance, a trader may want to buy 200 shares of Company A at $50 each with a stop-loss set at $45. If the share price falls to $45, the shares will be automatically sold, thus limiting potential losses.
- Sell Cover Order: A Sell Cover Order enables traders to execute a sell order for security along with a predetermined stop-loss level. Traders define the desired selling price and the stop-loss when placing the order. For example, a trader aiming to sell 150 shares of Company B at $60 each might set a stop-loss at $65. If the price climbs to $65, the shares will be automatically sold, helping to curtail potential losses.
- Intraday Cover Order: Intraday Cover Orders are tailored for traders who engage in intraday trading, where positions are opened and closed within the same trading session. These orders capitalize on intraday price movements while minimizing overnight exposure to market risks. Traders can quickly enter and exit positions, taking advantage of short-term fluctuations in asset prices.
Examples of Cover Order
Examples of Cover Orders showcase their practical application in real-life trading scenarios, catering to investors
Imagine a trader in New York eyeing an opportunity in a tech stock listed on the NASDAQ. Let’s say they want to buy 200 shares of Company A, priced at $100 per share, but are wary of potential downside risk. By placing a Buy Cover Order with a stop-loss at $95, the trader ensures that if the stock price declines to that level, their shares will be automatically sold, limiting potential losses.
Similarly, across the globe in Singapore, an investor is intrigued by the prospects of a pharmaceutical company listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX). They decide to sell short 150 shares of Company B, currently trading at SGD 50 per share, with a Sell Cover Order and a stop-loss set at SGD 55. In this scenario, if the stock price rises unexpectedly, triggering the stop-loss, the investor’s short position will be automatically covered, mitigating potential losses.
These examples illustrate how Cover Orders empower traders to manage risk effectively while capitalising on market opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Cover Orders work by combining a market order with a stop-loss order. When the market order is executed, the stop-loss order is simultaneously placed, allowing traders to manage risk effectively.
To use a Cover Order, traders need to specify the security, quantity, desired price, and stop-loss level through their brokerage platform. Once the order is executed, the stop-loss order is activated automatically.
The advantages of using a Cover Order in trading are:
- Risk Management: Cover Orders include a built-in stop-loss feature, helping traders limit their potential losses. This reduces exposure to market volatility, providing a safety net for their investments.
- Leverage: Traders can use Cover Orders to increase their market exposure with a smaller amount of capital. This leverage allows traders to maximize potential profits while still managing risk.
- Automated Execution: The stop-loss feature triggers automatically once the price hits a specified level, ensuring that traders don’t need to monitor the market to exit positions actively, reducing emotional trading decisions.
- Reduced Margin Requirement: Since Cover Orders involve a stop-loss, brokers may offer reduced margin requirements. This allows traders to make larger trades with less capital, enhancing their buying or selling power.
- Ideal for Intraday Trading: Cover Orders are especially useful for intraday traders who need to enter and exit positions within a single trading session. It allows them to capitalize on short-term market movements while swiftly limiting risks.
- Efficiency: Cover orders streamline the trading process by combining the buy/sell order and stop-loss in one command, making it quicker and more convenient for traders to execute their strategies.
These advantages make Cover Orders a powerful tool for traders seeking a balance between risk management and profit potential.
These advantages enable traders to optimise their trading strategies.
The drawbacks of using a Cover Order in trading are:
- Limited Flexibility: Cover Orders require both the order price and the stop-loss level to be set upfront, offering less flexibility if market conditions change quickly. Traders cannot adjust the stop-loss or order price once the Cover Order is placed.
- Strict Stop-Loss Requirement: The mandatory stop-loss in Cover Orders may not allow traders to hold onto positions during short-term market volatility, potentially leading to the sale of securities even if prices recover soon after.
- Higher Risk of Stop-Loss Trigger: Due to market fluctuations, the stop-loss may be triggered prematurely, causing traders to exit positions at a loss, even when long-term market conditions remain favorable.
- Limited to Intraday Trading: In many cases, Cover Orders are designed for intraday trading, which restricts traders from holding positions overnight. This limits potential gains from longer-term price movements.
- Leverage Risk: While leverage can magnify profits, it also amplifies losses. If the market moves against the trader’s position, the losses can be significantly higher than the capital invested, especially if the stop-loss isn’t set at an appropriate level.
- Broker-Defined Stop-Loss Range: Some brokers define a minimum stop-loss range, which may not align with the trader’s risk tolerance or strategy. This could force traders to use stop-loss levels that are either too close or too far from the market price, increasing the likelihood of unwanted exits.
These drawbacks highlight the importance of careful planning and strategy when using Cover Orders, as they may not suit all trading styles or market conditions.
The primary difference between Cover Orders and Bracket Orders lies in their complexity. While Cover Orders combine a market order with a stop-loss order, Bracket Orders incorporate additional profit-taking orders, offering more advanced risk management capabilities.
Related Terms
- Cost of Equity
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- Industry Groups
- Income Statement
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Embedded Options
- Dynamic Asset Allocation
- Depositary Receipts
- Deferment Payment Option
- Debt-to-Equity Ratio
- Financial Futures
- Contingent Capital
- Conduit Issuers
- Calendar Spread
- Cost of Equity
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- Industry Groups
- Income Statement
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Embedded Options
- Dynamic Asset Allocation
- Depositary Receipts
- Deferment Payment Option
- Debt-to-Equity Ratio
- Financial Futures
- Contingent Capital
- Conduit Issuers
- Calendar Spread
- Devaluation
- Grading Certificates
- Distributable Net Income
- Tracking Index
- Auction Rate Securities
- Arbitrage-Free Pricing
- Net Profits Interest
- Borrowing Limit
- Algorithmic Trading
- Corporate Action
- Spillover Effect
- Economic Forecasting
- Treynor Ratio
- Hammer Candlestick
- DuPont Analysis
- Net Profit Margin
- Law of One Price
- Annual Value
- Rollover option
- Financial Analysis
- Currency Hedging
- Lump sum payment
- Annual Percentage Yield (APY)
- Excess Equity
- Fiduciary Duty
- Bought-deal underwriting
- Anonymous Trading
- Fair Market Value
- Fixed Income Securities
- Redemption fee
- Acid Test Ratio
- Bid Ask price
- Finance Charge
- Futures
- Basis grades
- Short Covering
- Visible Supply
- Transferable notice
- Intangibles expenses
- Strong order book
- Fiat money
- Trailing Stops
- Exchange Control
- Relevant Cost
- Dow Theory
- Hyperdeflation
- Hope Credit
- Futures contracts
- Human capital
- Subrogation
- Qualifying Annuity
- Strategic Alliance
- Probate Court
- Procurement
- Holding company
- Harmonic mean
- Income protection insurance
- Recession
- Savings Ratios
- Pump and dump
- Total Debt Servicing Ratio
- Debt to Asset Ratio
- Liquid Assets to Net Worth Ratio
- Liquidity Ratio
- Personal financial ratios
- Payroll deduction plan
- Operating expenses
- Demand elasticity
- Deferred compensation
- Conflict theory
- Acid-test ratio
- Withholding Tax
- Benchmark index
- Double Taxation Relief
- Debtor Risk
- Securitization
- Yield on Distribution
- Currency Swap
- Overcollateralization
- Efficient Frontier
- Listing Rules
- Green Shoe Options
- Accrued Interest
- Market Order
- Accrued Expenses
- Target Leverage Ratio
- Acceptance Credit
- Balloon Interest
- Abridged Prospectus
- Data Tagging
- Perpetuity
- Optimal portfolio
- Hybrid annuity
- Investor fallout
- Intermediated market
- Information-less trades
- Back Months
- Adjusted Futures Price
- Expected maturity date
- Excess spread
- Quantitative tightening
- Accreted Value
- Equity Clawback
- Soft Dollar Broker
- Stagnation
- Replenishment
- Decoupling
- Holding period
- Regression analysis
- Wealth manager
- Financial plan
- Adequacy of coverage
- Actual market
- Credit risk
- Insurance
- Financial independence
- Annual report
- Financial management
- Ageing schedule
- Global indices
- Folio number
- Accrual basis
- Liquidity risk
- Quick Ratio
- Unearned Income
- Sustainability
- Value at Risk
- Vertical Financial Analysis
- Residual maturity
- Operating Margin
- Trust deed
- Profit and Loss Statement
- Junior Market
- Affinity fraud
- Base currency
- Working capital
- Individual Savings Account
- Redemption yield
- Net profit margin
- Fringe benefits
- Fiscal policy
- Escrow
- Externality
- Multi-level marketing
- Joint tenancy
- Liquidity coverage ratio
- Hurdle rate
- Kiddie tax
- Giffen Goods
- Keynesian economics
- EBITA
- Risk Tolerance
- Disbursement
- Bayes’ Theorem
- Amalgamation
- Adverse selection
- Contribution Margin
- Accounting Equation
- Value chain
- Gross Income
- Net present value
- Liability
- Leverage ratio
- Inventory turnover
- Gross margin
- Collateral
- Being Bearish
- Being Bullish
- Commodity
- Exchange rate
- Basis point
- Inception date
- Riskometer
- Trigger Option
- Zeta model
- Racketeering
- Market Indexes
- Short Selling
- Quartile rank
- Defeasance
- Cut-off-time
- Business-to-Consumer
- Bankruptcy
- Acquisition
- Turnover Ratio
- Indexation
- Fiduciary responsibility
- Benchmark
- Pegging
- Illiquidity
- Backwardation
- Backup Withholding
- Buyout
- Beneficial owner
- Contingent deferred sales charge
- Exchange privilege
- Asset allocation
- Maturity distribution
- Letter of Intent
- Emerging Markets
- Consensus Estimate
- Cash Settlement
- Cash Flow
- Capital Lease Obligations
- Book-to-Bill-Ratio
- Capital Gains or Losses
- Balance Sheet
- Capital Lease
Most Popular Terms
Other Terms
- Bond Convexity
- Compound Yield
- Brokerage Account
- Discretionary Accounts
- Industry Groups
- Growth Rate
- Green Bond Principles
- Gamma Scalping
- Funding Ratio
- Free-Float Methodology
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- Floating Dividend Rate
- Flight to Quality
- Real Return
- Protective Put
- Perpetual Bond
- Option Adjusted Spread (OAS)
- Non-Diversifiable Risk
- Merger Arbitrage
- Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)
- Income Bonds
- Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
- Flash Crash
- Equity Carve-Outs
- Cost Basis
- Deferred Annuity
- Cash-on-Cash Return
- Earning Surprise
- Bubble
- Beta Risk
- Bear Spread
- Asset Play
- Accrued Market Discount
- Ladder Strategy
- Junk Status
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Interest-Only Bonds (IO)
- Inflation Hedge
- Incremental Yield
- Industrial Bonds
- Holding Period Return
- Hedge Effectiveness
- Flat Yield Curve
- Fallen Angel
- Exotic Options
- Execution Risk
- Exchange-Traded Notes
- Event-Driven Strategy
- Eurodollar Bonds
- Enhanced Index Fund
Know More about
Tools/Educational Resources
Markets Offered by POEMS
Read the Latest Market Journal
Netflix Upgraded to BUY on Strong Engagement and Pricing Power Despite Softer Guidance
Company Overview Netflix Inc. operates as the world's leading streaming entertainment service, providing original and licensed content across various genres to members in over 190 countries. The company generates revenue through subscription fees and advertising, supported by a multi-tier pricing strategy that includes ad-supported plans. Strong Fundamentals Drive Upgrade Decision Phillip Securities Research has upgraded Netflix from ACCUMULATE to BUY, maintaining its target price of US$110. The upgrade reflects the company's robust fundamentals despite recent stock price movements, with the forward FY26 P/E ratio at an attractive 18.8 times compared to the 5-year average of 36.25 times. Key Positives Highlight Competitive Strengths Netflix's pricing power remains a cornerstone of its competitive advantage. The March 2026 price increases across key markets, including the US, Mexico, and Spain, ranging from 8% to 12.5% across major plans, have been successfully absorbed without indication of elevated churn rates. The company's multi-tier pricing strategy, including lower-priced ad-supported plans, provides consumers with flexibility to trade down rather than cancel subscriptions entirely, supporting long-term average revenue per member growth. Engagement metrics demonstrate no signs of slowing momentum. Despite facing tougher comparisons and competition from major sporting events like the Winter Olympics and FIFA World Cup, Netflix maintained healthy engagement levels. Viewing hours reached 97 billion in the first half of 2026, representing 2% year-over-year growth compared to 1.5% in the previous year. This sustained engagement, combined with membership growth and pricing initiatives, supported 13% year-over-year revenue growth across all regions. The advertising business continues its impressive scaling trajectory, remaining on track to double revenue in FY26. Netflix plans to increase investment in films and series by 10% year-over-year, reinforcing confidence in its long-term content pipeline and commitment to maintaining its competitive moat through content quality. Near-Term Headwinds Present Modest Concerns The primary negative factor centres on slightly softer third-quarter guidance amid challenging content comparisons. Netflix projected 12% year-over-year revenue growth for 3Q26, representing a modest deceleration from recent quarters. This outlook reflects a less compelling second-half content slate relative to 2025, which benefited from blockbuster releases including Stranger Things, Wednesday, and Squid Game that drove exceptional engagement. Additionally, management did not announce new initiatives such as a free ad-supported television platform, contributing to a more muted near-term outlook due to the absence of fresh catalysts. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Wells Fargo Delivers Strong Growth with 12% Loan Expansion, BUY Rating and US$115 Target Price
Company Overview Wells Fargo & Company is one of America's largest financial institutions, operating across multiple segments including Consumer Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB), and Wealth and Investment Management (WIM). The bank has been navigating regulatory constraints through an asset cap removal, which has now enabled significant balance sheet expansion opportunities. Strong Second Quarter Performance Wells Fargo reported impressive second quarter 2026 earnings of US$6.4 billion, representing a 17% year-on-year increase that slightly exceeded analyst estimates. The strong performance brought first-half earnings to 52% of the full-year forecast, demonstrating robust momentum. The bank achieved a return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) of 17.7%, up from 15.2% in the prior year quarter, whilst expenses rose only 2% despite significant business growth. Comprehensive Revenue Growth Across All Segments The bank delivered exceptional fee income growth, with non-interest income rising 13% year-on-year to US$10.3 billion. Investment advisory fees increased 13% on higher market valuations, whilst investment banking fees surged 35% as corporates returned to the debt and equity capital markets. Markets revenue grew 24%, supported by venture capital gains. Every business segment contributed to growth, with CIB revenue up 16%, WIM growing 13% with client assets reaching US$2.4 trillion, and both Consumer Banking and Commercial Banking expanding 6%. Non-interest income now represents 46% of total revenue, up from 44% previously. Balance Sheet Expansion Drives Net Interest Income For the first time in a decade, Wells Fargo achieved double-digit balance sheet growth. Average loans expanded 12% year-on-year to US$1.03 trillion, whilst deposits grew by 10% to US$1.47 trillion. This growth occurred across both consumer and commercial businesses, with CIB average loans rising 26% as the bank redeployed capacity freed by the asset cap removal. Net interest income rose 5% year-on-year to US$12.3 billion, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of growth. The bank maintained full-year NII guidance of approximately US$50 billion, with management indicating stronger growth expected in the second half. Research Recommendation Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY rating with a higher target price of US$115, raised from US$98 previously. The upgrade reflects increased earnings estimates driven by higher NII, investment advisory, brokerage and investment banking forecasts, alongside lower provision estimates. The bank remains the top pick among major banks, offering unique growth opportunities through post-asset cap expansion at attractive valuations of 10.3 times forward price-to-earnings versus 12 times to 14 times for peers. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Market Performance and Key Concerns The Magnificent 7 technology stocks experienced a significant pullback in June 2026, declining 8.5% compared to May's positive 5.4% performance. This sharp reversal saw the group substantially underperform both the S&P 500, which fell 1.1%, and the NASDAQ, which declined 2.8%. The decline was primarily driven by investor concerns over the substantial artificial intelligence spending commitments from major hyperscalers, including Microsoft (-17%), Meta (-11%), Amazon (-12%), and Google (-6%). These concerns were amplified by the four hyperscalers raising approximately US$139 billion in bonds during the first half of 2026, representing a 35% increase from their total bond issuances in 2025. Additional uncertainty emerged following the appointment of new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh in May, raising speculation about potential interest rate increases that could elevate AI financing costs. Individual Stock Performance Microsoft emerged as the biggest laggard, falling 17% after providing aggressive capital expenditure guidance of US$190 billion for fiscal year 2026, which exceeded consensus estimates of US$155 billion by 23%. This increase was attributed to higher-than-expected component prices driven by surging memory costs. Meta declined 11% amid reports that the company was considering raising tens of billions in equity funding to support its capital expenditure plans. Fundamental Demand Remains Strong Despite market concerns, research indicates that hyperscaler capital expenditure decisions are fundamentally sound, driven by genuine organic demand rather than speculative supply planning. The combined first quarter 2026 backlog for Microsoft, Google, and Amazon increased 46% year-over-year to US$873 billion, excluding deals with Anthropic and OpenAI. These partnerships, estimated at US$580 billion, are excluded from organic growth calculations due to their long-term nature of more than five years and associated execution and funding risks. The US$873 billion organic backlog serves as a reliable indicator of short-to-medium term AI demand from enterprises and sovereign nations, with the majority expected to be recognised within the next two years. Google noted that cloud revenue could have been higher if capacity constraints hadn't limited its ability to meet enterprise demand, whilst Amazon's Trainium chips are nearly fully subscribed and Microsoft anticipates capacity constraints continuing through 2026. Investment Outlook The research maintains an overweight recommendation on the Magnificent 7, noting that June's pullback reduced forward price-to-earnings valuations to 38.4 times from May's 39.7 times. The underperformance reflects broader investor rotation away from mega-cap technology stocks with high AI spending towards more attractively valued defensive sector names. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Singapore Catalist Board IPOs Outperform Mainboard; US Mega-Cap Strategy Favours Short-Term Trading
Singapore IPO Performance Reveals a Market Divide Recent analysis of Singapore's initial public offering (IPO) landscape reveals a stark performance disparity between the Mainboard and Catalist Board listings, with significant implications for investors seeking exposure to newly listed companies. Singapore Mainboard IPOs have delivered disappointing results, generating an average first-day return of -2%. This lacklustre performance is further highlighted by the fact that only one-third of IPOs managed to close above their IPO price on their debut trading day. Catalist Board Emerges as the Superior Option In contrast, Singapore's Catalist Board listings present a markedly different proposition for investors. These smaller-cap offerings have delivered reliable double-digit gains on their opening day, averaging an impressive 19.8%. The sustained post-listing gains further enhance the risk-reward profile for short-term IPO speculation. The Catalist Board's average performance across various timeframes demonstrates consistent strength, with 50.5% returns after one week, 54.3% after one month, 88.3% after three months, and 114.4% after six months. US IPO Strategy Recommendations For major US IPOs, the optimal approach differs significantly from the strategies used in Singapore. Large US offerings typically generate strong opening day momentum, averaging gains of 16%. However, the recommended strategy involves riding the initial one-week to one-month momentum wave before exiting positions ahead of lock-up expirations. Importantly, historical data suggests that buying and holding mega-cap IPOs through their first year has proven to be a value-destructive proposition, making timing crucial for US IPO investments. The analysis indicates that traders seeking short-term IPO speculation should favour Singapore's Catalist Board offerings over Mainboard listings, whilst US IPO strategies should focus on capturing initial momentum rather than long-term holding. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Singapore Banking Sector Upgraded to ACCUMULATE on Rising Loan Growth and Rate Stabilisation
Company Overview This analysis covers Singapore's major banking sector, focusing on the three primary banks: DBS, OCBC, and UOB. These institutions represent the core of Singapore's financial services landscape, serving both domestic and regional markets whilst benefiting from the city-state's position as a financial hub. Upgrade to ACCUMULATE Rating Phillip Securities Research has upgraded the Singapore banking sector to ACCUMULATE from Neutral, driven by accelerating loan growth, stabilising interest rates, and improved market conditions. The research house has raised target prices across all three major banks: DBS to S$76.00 from S$67.50, OCBC to S$28.50 from S$24.00, and UOB to S$43.00 from S$39.00, reflecting higher loan growth and earnings estimates. Interest Rate Environment Stabilising Singapore's 3-month SORA rose for the second consecutive month, increasing 1 basis point month-on-month to 1.07% in June. This represents the smallest year-on-year decline in 15 months at 109 basis points, suggesting that rates are beginning to bottom out. The stabilisation reflects the Federal Reserve's increasingly hawkish stance, with June projections signalling a possible rate hike and no cuts anticipated, creating a supportive backdrop for net interest margins. Strong Loan Growth and Deposit Trends Singapore loan growth continued its surge at 8.7% year-on-year, potentially leading to upward revisions to previous guidance to low- to mid-single digit growth. Current account and savings account (CASA) deposits rose 15% year-on-year, with the CASA deposits ratio improving to 20.7% from 20.5% in April, reaching the highest level since November 2022. This trend provides a tailwind for banks by lowering funding costs and cushioning net interest margin compression. Market Volatility Benefits Ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the collapsed US-Iran ceasefire and renewed strikes lifting oil prices, continue to generate market volatility. This environment benefits capital markets income and wealth management fees, providing meaningful offsets to net interest income headwinds. The sector offers attractive dividend yields of 4.1%, with ongoing share buybacks improving return on equity. DBS is preferred for its fixed dividend policy and guidance upgrade, whilst OCBC is favoured for wealth management growth and excess capital. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Strategic Acquisitions Drive Growth Q & M Dental Group Ltd has announced significant expansion plans through two major acquisitions that will substantially increase its regional footprint. The Singapore-based dental services provider is acquiring a 100% stake in Australia's Experteeth Dental Group and a 51% stake in Thailand's Deezy Dental Home for approximately S$107 million and S$39 million respectively. Company Profile Q & M Dental Group operates as a comprehensive dental services provider across the Asia-Pacific region. The company has established itself as a regional healthcare player in the healthcare sector, focusing on dental care services and clinic operations across multiple markets. Acquisition Details and Financing Structure The combined S$146 million purchase will be financed through S$92 million in cash and the issuance of 86.7 million new shares, representing 9.1% of existing shares. The new shares are priced at S$0.70 each and will be subject to a 15-year moratorium, ensuring long-term commitment from the vendors. The Australian acquisition targets Experteeth Dental Group, founded in 2017, which operates 40 dental clinics with 117 dentists across New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, and the Australian Capital Territory. The group operates under multiple established brands including Elevate Dental Group, Lumiere Dental Group, Ace Dental Group, Yiruda Dental Group, Prestige Dental Group, and Bubble Teeth Dental Group. The Thai acquisition involves Deezy Dental Home, also founded in 2017, which operates three dental clinics with 41 dentists. Strong Financial Backing and Growth Prospects The acquisitions are valued at an attractive price-to-earnings ratio of 11.4 times, with the Australian operation at 10 times and the Thai operation at 16 times. Importantly, the total S$146 million investment is supported by robust profit guarantees totalling S$126 million over six to eight years. This arrangement implies earnings growth of approximately 13%, with Thailand showing the highest growth potential at 22% compound annual growth rate. Analyst Outlook Phillip Securities Research maintains a positive outlook on these acquisitions, projecting that they could increase FY26 earnings per share by 1.04 cents, representing a 54% increase to 2.96 cents, excluding intangible amortisation. The research house maintains its BUY recommendation with an unchanged target price of S$0.71, based on price-to-earnings ratio of 25 times for FY26, aligned with Singapore's healthcare sector valuation. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Semiconductor Sector Sustains Strong Growth Momentum with Accelerating Revenue Expansion
Sector Performance Driven by Memory Boom and AI Infrastructure Demand The semiconductor sector continues to demonstrate robust growth momentum, with the Semiconductor ETF surging 39.9% over the past three months, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's 11.4% gain. Memory companies have emerged as the standout performers, posting exceptional gains of 95% driven by extraordinary first-quarter 2026 earnings growth exceeding 900% year-on-year. This remarkable performance stems from a substantial surge in DRAM and NAND prices amid widespread memory chip shortages. Extended Supply Contracts Signal Long-Term Industry Stability A notable shift in industry dynamics has emerged through the establishment of longer-term supply agreements. Hyperscalers and high-end chipmakers are now committing to multi-year contracts extending until 2030, representing a significant departure from previous agreements that typically lasted only one year with flexible financing terms. These new arrangements require approximately 20% cash deposits to secure supply, demonstrating the critical importance of memory chips in AI data centre buildouts. Equipment manufacturers report that these extended memory contracts provide enhanced supply chain visibility extending through the end of 2027. Processor Segment Shows Accelerating Growth Trajectory The processor segment continues its growth acceleration, with first-quarter 2026 revenue surging 53% year-on-year, up from 40% growth in the fourth quarter of 2025. This momentum is expected to continue, with second-quarter 2026 revenue guidance indicating a substantial 67% year-on-year increase to US$159 billion. The growth is underpinned by robust hyperscaler demand for data centre GPUs, CPUs, and ASICs. NVIDIA leads the sector with first-quarter revenue spiking 85% year-on-year to US$81.6 billion, marking the third consecutive quarter of accelerating growth. AMD demonstrated its strongest year-on-year growth since 2022, with revenue increasing 38% to US$10.3 billion, driven by MI350 GPU and fifth-generation EPYC CPU adoption. Broadcom achieved its strongest growth since 2016, with revenue rising 48% year-on-year to US$22.2 billion, supported by AI semiconductor revenue that grew 143% year-on-year to a record US$10.8 billion. The sector maintains strong forward momentum, supported by hyperscalers' combined 2026 capital expenditure guidance of US$710 billion, representing an 89% year-on-year increase. Equipment players continue to benefit from strong services demand as memory customers seek performance upgrades on existing tools due to limited cleanroom space. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Singapore Airlines Benefits from Fuel Hedging Amid Jet Fuel Volatility, Maintains Market Position
Aviation Sector Performance and Fuel Dynamics Singapore's aviation sector delivered steady performance in June 2026, with SATS leading gains at 14.2%, followed by Singapore Airlines at 11.6% and SIA Engineering at 7.3%. Meanwhile, CAO declined 1.1%. The sector continues to navigate volatile jet fuel markets, with Singapore jet fuel prices currently trading at US$115 per barrel, down significantly from the March 2026 peak of US$240.5 per barrel following a US-Iran peace deal that reduced prices by approximately 50%. Singapore Airlines' Strategic Positioning Singapore Airlines has demonstrated resilience through its comprehensive hedging strategy and operational adaptability. The carrier maintains a dual hedge structure covering both Brent crude and jet fuel, with 35% hedging on jet fuel and 14% on Brent crude for the second quarter of FY2026/27. This positioning has provided relative insulation from fuel price volatility compared to unhedged competitors. The airline has capitalised on several market opportunities, including rerouted demand for Asia-Europe flights stopping over in Singapore due to regional conflicts. Additionally, Singapore Airlines benefits from rising cargo yields, with global freight rates increasing 41% year-on-year to US$3.40 per kilogram. The company's budget subsidiary, Scoot, has captured demand from regional low-cost carriers that grounded aircraft during the conflict period. Market Outlook and Competitive Landscape Despite current price reductions, jet fuel remains approximately 33% above the 2025 averages of US$90 per barrel. Regional carriers show varying degrees of hedging protection, with Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Japan Airlines, and ANA maintaining stronger hedged positions. Conversely, China's Big Three airlines—Air China, China Southern, and China Eastern—remain largely unhedged and face greater exposure to fuel price fluctuations. The cargo segment presents additional opportunities, as the partial grounding of Middle East airlines has removed significant capacity from India-Europe and China/Southeast Asia-Europe routes. This capacity reduction has pushed Asia-Europe spot rates to US$5.26 per kilogram in late June, representing a 38% year-on-year increase. While Singapore Airlines' cargo revenue exposure of 11% makes it a secondary beneficiary compared to carriers with higher cargo proportions, the company still stands to benefit from elevated rates. Analysts maintain a neutral stance on air transportation, given uncertain resolution of geopolitical conflicts and the potential for renewed fuel price volatility if ceasefires break down. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
