Proxy Voting
Proxy voting is one of the most basic aspects of corporate governance. It allows shareholders to be engaged and vote on the organisation’s key decisions without having to attend meetings, ensuring that shareholder interests are reflected in the company’s policies, operations, and long-term strategy. The article intends to provide an elaborate description of proxy voting, its types, challenges, and examples in simple, easy-to-understand language.
Table of Contents
What is Proxy Voting?
The voting of proxies is the assignment of voting rights from the shareholder to another individual or organisation, called a proxy, to represent him during meetings with shareholders. Due to distance and schedule differences between the two places, the owner of the shares cannot necessarily be present in meetings and needs proxy voting for a stronger presence of their interest.
A proxy may be a person, for example, a trusted advisor, or an organisation, such as a proxy advisory firm. Through this process, shareholders can influence the decisions of a corporation, for instance:
Election of board members
- Approval of mergers or acquisitions
- Changes in policies on corporate governance
- Decisions on executive compensation packages
The one granting the voting authority is called the “principal,” while the one assigned with the voting authority is referred to as the “proxy.”
Understanding Proxy Voting
Proxy voting is the conduit between shareholders and the company in its decision-making process. It operates in a sequence:
- Distribution of Proxy Materials
Before the meeting, shareholders obtain proxy materials from the company. These usually consist of a proxy statement explaining the agenda schedule, a proxy card through which voting is done, and instructions on how to vote.
- Proxy voting
Shareholders can attend the meeting personally and vote or complete their proxy card and indicate their views regarding the matters they submit. Ballots are frequently submitted by mail or telephone or even on the internet from the company’s business.
- Tally Votes
After the meeting, all proxy and in-person votes cast are tabulated. Sometimes, an independent auditor or even an internal team handles the process to ensure accuracy.
- Legal Compliance
Legal frameworks such as the Securities and Exchange Commission allow proxy voting in the United States. Thus, they guard against all shareholders receiving unequal treatment by making the transaction practice clear and fair.
Proxy voting allows shareholders to participate despite being absent in person, and therefore, their voices are included in governance.
Types of Proxy Voting
There are several types of proxy voting mechanisms to suit the different needs of the shareholders:
- General Proxy.
A general proxy gives the proxy holder, often a company representative or a designated proxy agent, full authority to vote on all matters presented at the shareholder meeting. These include resolutions, elections of directors, and other important decisions. The proxy holder exercises discretion in voting, acting in the shareholder’s best interest.
- Limited Proxy
A limited proxy will provide more explicit instructions to the proxy holder. Shareholders can specify how they want their shares voted on specific agenda items. In this manner, control over the voting process is more pronounced and ensures that the proxy holder carries out the shareholder’s wishes.
- Blank Proxy
A blank proxy allows the proxy holder to vote on all meeting matters. Shareholders may choose this method if they do not have specific instructions or rely on the proxy holder’s judgment. Of course, this does not always work in the shareholder’s best interest.
- Electronic Proxy Voting
This allows the shareholders to vote through an electronic system with the advancement of technology. Benefits of this e-proxy method of voting:
- Advantage: It allows someone to vote from any location with internet access while also preventing the attendance and mailing of paper proxies.
- Security: This online system has a mechanism to safeguard shareholder information and ensure fairness in voting.
- Efficiency: E-voting makes it easier and saves on administrative costs and processing time to have a voting procedure for shareholders and companies.
The proxy voting mechanism chosen depends on several factors, such as the level of shareholder involvement, the complexity of the issues to be voted on, and the degree of trust in the proxy holder. Understanding the different types of proxy voting allows shareholders to make informed decisions and actively participate in corporate governance.
Challenges and Issues in Proxy Voting
Although proxy voting bears merits, some problems are identified in the following.
- Information Complexity
Annual reports, financial data, and proxy statements are often detailed documents often received by retail investors from shareholders. Understanding what their votes mean in this context can become quite confusing for them.
- Proxy Advisory Firms Influence
Proxy advisory firms like ISS and Glass Lewis guide shareholders in voting in a particular direction. While such firms give precious guidance, they might tend to unduly influence the votes. Issues regarding potential conflicts of interest arise as the same advisory firm also offers consultancy services to the same firms it appraises.
- Electronic Voting Security Threats
The threat of cybersecurity also lives in electronic voting. Therefore, hacking the computerised voting system would pose an immediate threat to the integrity and confidentiality of a vote.
- Legal Compliance
Several regulations govern proxy voting. These include distributing materials to shareholders within time, reporting on the votes’ outcome, and complying with disclosure requirements. However, these can be quite cumbersome and expensive to follow, mainly for small firms.
- Shareholder Indifference
Most retail shareholders are careless when using their proxy, so participation rates in this process remain low. In such cases, decisions become imbalanced for the other shareholders, particularly institutions or activists.
Proper shareholder education, robust rules and regulations, and secure voting processes may improve such issues.
Examples of Proxy Vote
Example 1: Kirkland Lake Gold and Detour Gold Acquisition
In 2019, a Canadian gold mining company, Kirkland Lake Gold, announced a plan to buy Detour Gold by an all-share offer. The proposal needed the approval of both companies from the shareholders.
The shareholders were furnished with detailed proxy materials explaining why the acquisition should be made, its benefits, and its effects on the financial statements of both companies. The proxy vote helped win the needed approval. This case shows how proxy voting empowers shareholders to vote on major corporate decisions even if they cannot attend meetings.
Example 2: Procter & Gamble Proxy Fight
Perhaps the most famous proxy fight was between Procter & Gamble (P&G) and activist investor Nelson Peltz in 2017. Trian Partners, the firm of Peltz, wanted a board seat to be heard on the strategic direction of P&G.
Peltz campaigned aggressively and challenged investors to vote him into power by proxy. P&G’s management opposed his move for the seat and launched its effort to stay in charge. The battle ended up as one of corporations’ costliest and most bitter shareholder contests ever. It was a testimony that proxy voting is essential in resolving governance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Companies use proxy voting to allow shareholders who are not present at the meeting sessions to vote on governance decisions. This allows all shareholders a fair opportunity to influence corporate policies or strategies even though they are away and cannot attend.
Proxy voting allows shareholders to authorise another person (a proxy) to vote on their behalf. Shareholders receive proxy materials explaining the meeting’s agenda and can then cast their votes via mail, phone, or online before the meeting. The proxy then represents their decisions during the meeting.
Yes, proxies can change a shareholder’s vote before the voting deadline. Such flexibility means that shareholders can alter their choice based on information or a change of circumstances. Where a shareholder casts multiple votes, the latest vote counts.
The difference here is participation. Proxy voting allows shareholders to delegate their voting rights to participate without attending the meeting. In-person voting requires physical attendance, where shareholders cast their votes directly.
Proxy advisors are organisations that provide research, analysis, and recommendations to shareholders about how to vote on corporate matters. The role is advisory, providing guidance based on corporate governance standards, financial analysis, and shareholder interests. Some examples include Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis.
Related Terms
- Variable Annuity
- Asset Swaps
- Anchoring Bias
- Compound Yield
- Discretionary Accounts
- Industry Groups
- Growth Rate
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- Floating Dividend Rate
- Real Return
- Non-Diversifiable Risk
- Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)
- Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
- Flash Crash
- Cost Basis
- Variable Annuity
- Asset Swaps
- Anchoring Bias
- Compound Yield
- Discretionary Accounts
- Industry Groups
- Growth Rate
- Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
- Floating Dividend Rate
- Real Return
- Non-Diversifiable Risk
- Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)
- Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
- Flash Crash
- Cost Basis
- Deferred Annuity
- Cash-on-Cash Return
- Bubble
- Asset Play
- Accrued Market Discount
- Inflation Hedge
- Incremental Yield
- Holding Period Return
- Hedge Effectiveness
- Fallen Angel
- EBITDA Margin
- Dollar Rolls
- Dividend Declaration Date
- Distribution Yield
- Derivative Security
- Fiduciary
- Current Yield
- Core Position
- Cash Dividend
- Broken Date
- Share Classes
- Valuation Point
- Breadth Thrust Indicator
- Book-Entry Security
- Bearish Engulfing
- Core inflation
- Approvеd Invеstmеnts
- Allotment
- Annual Earnings Growth
- Solvency
- Impersonators
- Reinvestment date
- Volatile Market
- Trustee
- Sum-of-the-Parts Valuation (SOTP)
- Passive Income
- Diversifying Portfolio
- Open-ended scheme
- Capital Gains Distribution
- Investment Insights
- Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
- Portfolio manager
- Net assets
- Nominal Return
- Systematic Investment Plan
- Issuer Risk
- Fundamental Analysis
- Account Equity
- Withdrawal
- Realised Profit/Loss
- Unrealised Profit/Loss
- Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
- High-Quality Securities
- Shareholder Yield
- Conversion Privilege
- Cash Reserve
- Factor Investing
- Open-Ended Investment Company
- Front-End Load
- Tracking Error
- Replication
- Real Yield
- DSPP
- Bought Deal
- Bulletin Board System
- Portfolio turnover rate
- Reinvestment privilege
- Initial purchase
- Subsequent Purchase
- Fund Manager
- Target Price
- Top Holdings
- Liquidation
- Direct market access
- Deficit interest
- EPS forecast
- Adjusted distributed income
- International securities exchanges
- Margin Requirement
- Pledged Asset
- Stochastic Oscillator
- Prepayment risk
- Homemade leverage
- Prime bank investments
- ESG
- Capitulation
- Shareholder service fees
- Insurable Interest
- Minority Interest
- Passive Investing
- Market cycle
- Progressive tax
- Correlation
- NFT
- Carbon credits
- Hyperinflation
- Hostile takeover
- Travel insurance
- Money market
- Dividend investing
- Digital Assets
- Coupon yield
- Counterparty
- Sharpe ratio
- Alpha and beta
- Investment advisory
- Wealth management
- Variable annuity
- Asset management
- Value of Land
- Investment Policy
- Investment Horizon
- Forward Contracts
- Equity Hedging
- Encumbrance
- Money Market Instruments
- Share Market
- Opening price
- Transfer of Shares
- Alternative investments
- Lumpsum
- Derivatives market
- Operating assets
- Hypothecation
- Accumulated dividend
- Assets under management
- Endowment
- Return on investment
- Investments
- Acceleration clause
- Heat maps
- Lock-in period
- Tranches
- Stock Keeping Unit
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Prospectus
- Turnover
- Tangible assets
- Preference Shares
- Open-ended investment company
- Ordinary Shares
- Leverage
- Standard deviation
- Independent financial adviser
- ESG investing
- Earnest Money
- Primary market
- Leveraged Loan
- Transferring assets
- Shares
- Fixed annuity
- Underlying asset
- Quick asset
- Portfolio
- Mutual fund
- Xenocurrency
- Bitcoin Mining
- Option contract
- Depreciation
- Inflation
- Cryptocurrency
- Options
- Fixed income
- Asset
- Reinvestment option
- Capital appreciation
- Style Box
- Top-down Investing
- Trail commission
- Unit holder
- Yield curve
- Rebalancing
- Vesting
- Private equity
- Bull Market
- Absolute Return
- Leaseback
- Impact investing
- Venture Capital
- Buy limit
- Asset stripper
- Volatility
- Investment objective
- Annuity
- Sustainable investing
- Face-amount certificate
- Lipper ratings
- Investment stewardship
- Average accounting return
- Asset class
- Active management
- Breakpoint
- Expense ratio
- Bear market
- Hedging
- Equity options
- Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA)
- Due Diligence
- Contrarian Investor
Most Popular Terms
Other Terms
- Alpha Capture
- Bond Convexity
- Brokerage Account
- Green Bond Principles
- Gamma Scalping
- Funding Ratio
- Free-Float Methodology
- Flight to Quality
- Protective Put
- Perpetual Bond
- Option Adjusted Spread (OAS)
- Merger Arbitrage
- Income Bonds
- Equity Carve-Outs
- Cost of Equity
- Earning Surprise
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
- Beta Risk
- Bear Spread
- Ladder Strategy
- Junk Status
- Intrinsic Value of Stock
- Interest-Only Bonds (IO)
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- Industry Groups
- Industrial Bonds
- Income Statement
- Historical Volatility (HV)
- Flat Yield Curve
- Exotic Options
- Execution Risk
- Exchange-Traded Notes
- Event-Driven Strategy
- Eurodollar Bonds
- Enhanced Index Fund
- Embedded Options
- Dynamic Asset Allocation
- Dual-Currency Bond
- Downside Capture Ratio
- Dividend Capture Strategy
- Depositary Receipts
- Delta Neutral
- Deferment Payment Option
- Dark Pools
- Death Cross
- Debt-to-Equity Ratio
- Fixed-to-floating rate bonds
- First Call Date
- Financial Futures
- Firm Order
Know More about
Tools/Educational Resources
Markets Offered by POEMS
Read the Latest Market Journal
Maximizing Retirement Wealth: How to Invest CPF-OA and SRS in SGX ETFs
For working professionals in Singapore, building a comfortable retirement nest egg requires more than just relying on monthly salary savings. The Singapore government offers two powerful retirement savings vehicles: the Central Provident Fund Ordinary Account (CPF-OA) and the Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS). While keeping cash in these accounts guarantees safety, holding idle funds during inflationary periods risks eroding your long-term purchasing power. By strategically investing CPF-OA and SRS funds into Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX), you can harness market growth while enjoying tax efficiency. 1. The Baseline: Understanding Your Minimum Target Returns Before investing, consider both the returns you may gain by keeping your money in its existing account and the potential benefits and risks of investing it instead. As a rule of thumb, your expected investment returns should be higher than the risk-free interest rate guaranteed by each account since investing involves taking on greater risks: · CPF-OA Target Return (2.50% p.a. base): CPF-OA provides a risk-free guaranteed return of 2.5% per year (and up to 3.5% on the first S$20,000 of OA balance via extra CPF interest). Additional CPF interest may also apply to eligible balances, depending on your age and total CPF savings. However, additional interest earned on OA savings is credited to your Special Account or Retirement Account, rather than retained in the OA. Investing your CPF-OA only makes sense if your target portfolio can consistently yield 5.0%–7.0% per year over a long horizon (10+ years). · SRS Target Return (0.05% p.a. base): The SRS is a voluntary retirement savings scheme that offers tax benefits to eligible contributors. Uninvested cash in an SRS account earns a basic bank savings rate of just 0.05% per year. Leaving SRS funds idle will result in a loss of buying power to inflation over time. The Power of Compounding S$10,000 Over 20 Years Investment Strategy Projected Return (p.a.) Value After 20 Years Idle in SRS 0.05% ~S$10,100 Idle in CPF-OA (Base Rate) 2.50% ~S$16,386 Core SGX ETF Strategy 6.50% (Projected) ~S$35,236 Investing SRS funds gives you the opportunity to seek higher returns over time, although this comes with investment risk. The choice of investments should reflect your financial objectives, risk tolerance and retirement timeline. 2. Option 1: Investing CPF-OA via CPFIS Rules & Eligibility To invest CPF-OA funds under the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS-OA), you must: Be at least 20 years old and not an undischarged bankrupt. Maintain a mandatory minimum balance of S$20,000 in your CPF-OA (only funds above S$20,000 can be invested). Complete the online CPFIS Self-Assessment Test (SAT). Opened a CPF Investment Account with one of the three approved agent banks Note: Not all investments are eligible under CPFIS. Investors should check the scheme's requirements and the eligibility of specific products before committing their savings. Popular CPFIS-Approved SGX ETFs CPFIS sets strict limits on management fees and risk levels. Top approved ETFs on SGX include: Ticker ETF Name Asset Class / Focus CPFIS Risk Level ES3.SI SPDR Straits Times Index ETF Top 30 Singapore Listed Companies Low to Medium Risk G3B.SI Nikko AM Singapore STI ETF Top 30 Singapore Listed Companies Low to Medium Risk A35.SI ABF Singapore Bond Index Fund Singapore Government & AAA-Rated Bonds Low Risk 3. Option 2: Supercharging Retirement with the Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS) Tax Relief Mechanics SRS is a voluntary account that helps you save on taxes today while building wealth for tomorrow. Annual Contribution Caps: Up to S$15,300 for Singaporeans/PRs (and S$35,700 for foreigners). Tax Benefit: Every dollar contributed directly reduces your taxable income for that year (e.g., contributing $15,300 to SRS reduces your taxable assessable income for the year by $15,300). Tax-Free Withdrawals at Retirement: 50% of SRS withdrawals are tax-exempt if made on or after the statutory retirement age (age 63, moving to 64 in July 2026 and 65 by 2030). Broader Choice of Investments Unlike CPF-OA, SRS funds can be invested in a wider range of eligible products, such as any ETF listed on SGX, allowing for broader global and sector exposure. e available choices differ from those under CPFIS, so investors should verify whether a particular product is eligible before investing. Examples of ETFS to research include: Regional Technology: Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng TECH ETF (HST.SI) Real Estate Income (S-REITs): Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF (CLR.SI) or NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT ETF (CFA.SI) Global / US Equities: SPDR S&P 500 ETF (S27.SI) 4. Sample Model Portfolios for CPF-OA & SRS The appropriate allocation depends on your retirement horizon, financial circumstances, risk tolerance and existing investments. The following examples illustrate how investors might approach portfolio construction Strategy A: Conservative Growth & Income (CPF-OA Focus) Designed for stability with steady dividend income: 70% Allocation: SPDR STI ETF (ES3.SI) — Captures ~3.5%–4.5% annual dividend yield from Singapore's top banks and companies. 30% Allocation: ABF Singapore Bond Index Fund (A35.SI) — Provides fixed income backed by Singapore Government Securities. Strategy B: Global Growth & Yield (SRS Focus) Designed for long-term wealth growth and income: 50% Allocation: SPDR S&P 500 ETF (S27.SI) — Broad exposure to the top 500 US companies. 30% Allocation: Lion-OCBC Hang Seng TECH ETF (HST.SI) — Targeted growth exposure to major Asian tech leaders. 20% Allocation: Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF (CLR.SI) — Generates regular dividend payouts from Singapore Real Estate Investment Trusts. 5. Key Considerations & Best Practices Mind the Transaction Fees: Transaction fees, agent bank charges and other applicable costs can affect your net returns, particularly when making smaller investments. For example, CPFIS trades incur agent bank clearing fees ($2 to $2.50 per transaction for CPFIS). Review the full fee schedule and consider how frequently you trade. Investing larger amounts less frequently may reduce the proportion of costs relative to the amount invested, although this should not come at the expense of an appropriate investment strategy. Reinvest Dividend Distributions: Dividends and fund distributions can contribute to long-term portfolio growth. If your objective is to accumulate retirement savings, reinvesting these proceeds may help your investments compound over time. Cash dividends from CPFIS and SRS investments flow back into your agent bank account. Set a calendar reminder to manually reinvest these funds periodically so your wealth keeps compounding. Avoid Early SRS Withdrawals: Withdrawing SRS cash before reaching your statutory retirement age incurs a 5% penalty, and 100% of the withdrawn amount will be taxed as income. Plan your contributions with your expected cash-flow needs in mind, and avoid committing money that you may need access to before retirement. 5. Key Takeaways CPF-OA and SRS serve different purposes, and investing through either scheme involves trade-offs. Beat the Hurdle Rates: CPF-OA provides a base interest rate (2.5% p.a.) and additional interest may apply under CPF rules, while SRS offers potential tax benefits and access to eligible investments. The decision is not simply about seeking the highest possible return. It is about understanding the benefits you may be giving up, the risks you are taking, and how each investment fits into your broader retirement plan. Optimise Taxes & Costs: Utilise SRS for immediate dollar-for-dollar tax deductions and batch your CPFIS trades to keep agent bank fees low. Stay Invested: Automate dividend reinvestments and hold your SRS positions until reaching the statutory retirement age to avoid early withdrawal penalties. As always, before investing, review your financial needs, compare the costs and investment options available, and ensure that your portfolio is appropriate for your circumstances. A well-considered strategy should support your retirement goals without exposing you to risks you cannot afford to take. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF: Analysts Maintain Positive Outlook Despite Rate Headwinds
Brief Overview Phillip Securities Research maintains its ACCUMULATE recommendation on Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF (SREITS) with a reduced target price of S$0.85, down from S$0.90. The ETF has undergone portfolio changes with Keppel DC REIT becoming the top holding, replacing CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, while Mapletree Logistics Trust remains the third-largest position. The fund continues to offer diversified exposure across retail, commercial, industrial and data-centre assets, balancing stable income with growth opportunities. Investment Positives The ETF's strongest advantage lies in its well-diversified portfolio structure across eight property sectors. Industrial assets form the largest allocation at 35.6%, followed by retail at 17.5%, providing investors with broad exposure across Singapore's REIT market while reducing concentration risk in any single sector. The diversified exposure to retail, commercial, industrial, and data-centre assets create a balanced investment proposition that combines stable rental income streams with structural growth opportunities. This diversificiation allows the ETF to benefit from different property cycles and tenant demand patterns across various sectors. Looking ahead, analysts expect organic rental growth to support the ETF's performance. In addition, easing domestic financing costs should provide tailwinds for the underlying REITs, contributing to a gradual recovery in distribution per unit (DPU) through FY27. Challenges The primary concern facing the ETF is uncertainty over the interest-rate outlook, which may limit near-term valuation upside. Interest rate movements typically have an inverse relationship with REIT valuations, and the current uncertain environment creates headwinds for immediate price appreciation. Outlook Despite near-term challenges from interest rate uncertainty, the analysts maintain a constructive medium-term outlook. The combination of organic rental growth and easing domestic financing costs is expected to support a gradual recovery in DPU throughFY27, providing a pathway for improved performance as interest rate concerns subside. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research maintains its ACCUMULATE recommendation for Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF. The analysts have lowered their target price to S$0.85 from the previous S$0.90, derived using a combination of historical dividend yield spread and price-to-book ratio methodologies, with equal weighting applied to both valuation approaches. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Semiconductor Sector Shows Strong Growth Acceleration Led by Custom ASIC Players
Brief Overview The semiconductor sector has demonstrated mixed performance over the past three months, with the Semiconductor ETF rising 2.4% but underperforming the S&P500's 4.1% gain. Equipment players faced headwinds due to elevated valuations, while memory companies declined amid HBM4 shipment uncertainties. However, enterprise and sovereign AI buildout is driving higher demand, with Coreweave and Nebius' combined remaining performance obligations reaching US$141 billion in June 2026. Investment Positives The semiconductor sector presents compelling growth opportunities across multiple segments. Custom ASIC companies are leading the acceleration, with Broadcom and Marvell guiding 3Q26e revenue to surge 89% year-on-year to a combined US$38 billion, surpassing the combined growth guidance of 83% from NVIDIA and AMD. Equipment manufacturers are experiencing robust demand, with their combined 3Q26e revenue guided to reach 52% year-on-year growth to US$31.4 billion, representing potentially the largest growth since 2021. This equipment demand is underpinned by TSMC's increased capital expenditure guidance of US$62 billion, marking a 15% increase, alongside memory players' higher equipment spending as new fabrication facilities ramp up production. The broadening customer base strengthens the sector's resilience. Coreweave and Nebius have expanded their client roster to include major enterprises such as Caterpillar, Grammarly, Databricks, Reflection, AI neolabs and quantitative trading firms. This diversification across AI neoclouds, enterprises and sovereign nations makes NVIDIA and AMD's growth more resilient should hyperscaler capital expenditure moderate. From a valuation perspective, large-cap SaaS companies are trading at roughly -1 standard deviation, with an EV/Sales multiple of 9.5x versus their 3-year average of 10.8x, suggesting attractive valuations despite strong performance. Enterprise and sovereign nations' AI buildout continues to drive substantial demand growth, with Coreweave and Nebius' combined remaining performance obligations increasing 72% from December 2025 to reach US$141 billion by June 2026. Challenges Valuation concerns persist in certain segments of the semiconductor sector. Equipment players AMAT and Lam Research have experienced significant pullbacks, declining 10.6% and 3.7% respectively, as they trade at elevated forward price-to-earnings ratios of 40x and 34x, compared with the sector average of 27x. Memory companies face headwinds from currency fluctuations and product transition uncertainties. SK Hynix declined 17% while Samsung fell 1.9%, laregly due to uncertainty surrounding HBM4 shipment timelines and the impact of a stronger Korean won on their financial performance. Outlook The outlook for the semiconductor sector remains positive, supported by accelerating growth across the custom ASIC, equipment and foundry segments. Revenue growth acceleration is expected in 3Q26e across these key areas, with custom ASIC companies leading the charge. The diversification of AI demand across multiple customer segments provides additional stability to the growth trajectory. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research maintains an OVERWEIGHT recommendation on the semiconductor sector, reflecting confidence in the strong growth momentum of custom ASIC companies, equipment manufacturers and foundry operations. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Software Sector Stages Strong Recovery as AI Concerns Subside
Brief Overview The software industry has experienced a significant re-rating, with the iShares Software ETF (IGV) rebounding 17% in 3Q26 and now sitting just 7% below its September 2025 peak. SaaS LTM revenue growth accelerated to 17.5% YoY in 2Q26, marking the strongest growth in 15 quarters. Phillip Securities Research maintains an OVERWEIGHT stance on software, favouring SaaS infrastructure, data analytics, and cybersecurity as key AI beneficiaries. Investment Positives The software sector's recovery has been driven by easing concerns over AI disruption, with market leader Microsoft surging 30% following its 4Q26 results. Microsoft's performance was supported by Azure growth exceeding 40% YoY, no unexpected incremental capital expenditure announcements despite peers raising spending, and the introduction of usage-based billing. The rebound has also extended to data and AI platform companies, with Palantir gaining 61% and Snowflake rising 35% during the quarter. Salesforce also advanced following the launch of Claudeforce, its joint application with Anthropic, reinforcing the value of proprietary enterprise data despite increasingly capable AI models. Large-cap SaaS companies continue to outperform, benefiting from AI-tier upgrades, usage-based pricing, and seat expansion. These companies are enjoying higher sales growth of 18.2%, which is 0.7 percentage points higher year-on-year, as enterprises spend more on higher-priced AI tiers, increase adoption of usage-based pricing, and expand seat usage. Excluding Microsoft and Oracle, growth remained healthy at 16.3%. From a valuation perspective, large-cap SaaS companies are trading at roughly -1 standard deviation, with an EV/Sales multiple of 9.5x versus their 3-year average of 10.8x, suggesting attractive valuations despite strong performance. Challenges Cybersecurity valuations remain elevated, with companies trading at stretched multiples. This has led to concerns about sustainability of current price levels in this subsector, despite its strong year-to-date performance. Outlook The software sector appears to be emerging from what the research describes as the "SaaSpocalypse", with growth rates expected to persist in 3Q26e. The preferred investment areas include SaaS infrastructure, data analytics, and cybersecurity as key AI beneficiaries. Top picks are supported by strong AI adoption, expanding backlog conversion, and rising enterprise data demand. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research maintains an OVERWEIGHT recommendation on the software sector. Preferred names include Microsoft, Oracle, Palantir, and Snowflake. However, the firm has downgraded Palo Alto Networks to NEUTRAL, as its valuation appears stretched, trading at 97x P/E versus its 5-year average of 54x. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Stoneweg Europe Stapled Trust Pursues Growth Through Management Internalisation
Brief Overview Stoneweg Europe Stapled Trust (SERT) is proposing to internalise its manager for €114 million at a 14% discount to independent valuation, creating a fully integrated European logistics and digital infrastructure platform with approximately €3.2 billion of assets under management. The transaction will be funded through issuing 40 million stapled securities to sponsor SWI Group at €2.00 each, representing a 33% premium to the last traded price of €1.50. Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation with an unchanged target price of €1.89, highlighting the deal's immediate distribution per stapled security (DPS) accretion and growth potential. Investment Positives The internalisation presents compelling value creation opportunities for SERT. The acquisition pricing appears attractive at 7.1x P/EBIT based on the effective consideration of €94mn, significantly below the independent valuer's 10.1x multiple. This favourable valuation provides SERT with immediate financial benefits. The transaction is expected to deliver substantial DPS accretion of 5.9%, supported by approximately €11 million in third-party asset management fees and the elimination of external management fees. Even when excluding third-party asset management contracts, the deal remains 3.1% DPS accretive, demonstrating the inherent value of the internalisation structure. Strategically, the transaction brings SERT's pan-European logistics and light-industrial operating capabilities in-house while preserving access to growth opportunities. Strategic cooperation agreements maintain exclusive access to SWI Group's European logistics and light-industrial opportunitie, as well as preferred access to specialist data centre capabilities. This supports SERT's ambition to increase its logistics and light-industrial exposure towards 70% of its portfolio from the current 55.7%. Upon completion, SERT will manage approximately €3.2 billion of AUM and combine recurring property income with asset management earnings. The internalisation allows SERT to retain acquisition and asset management fees from future acquisitions, creating additional revenue streams and enhancing long-term profitability. Challenges The completion of this transaction faces several hurdles, remaining subject to regulatory and third-party consents, as well as securityholder approval at an extraordinary general meeting. These requirements introduce execution risk and potential delays to the anticipated benefits. Outlook The internalisation represents a significant strategic shift for SERT, positioning the trust as a fully integrated platform capable of capturing both property income and asset management earnings. The transaction also provides potential for further growth through data centre conversions and SERT's stake in AiOnX, while maintaining access to SWI Group's pipeline of opportunities. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research maintains a BUY recommendation with an unchanged dividend discount model-derived target price of €1.89. The research house remains positive on the transaction given its immediate DPS accretion and potential to capture additional earnings from the integrated operating platform. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Brief Overview Phillip Securities Research has initiated coverage on Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust (FLCT) with a BUY recommendation and a target price of S$1.01. The research highlights FLCT's resilient logistics and industrial portfolio, substantial acquisition pipeline from sponsor FPL, and attractive forward dividend yields of 6.8%. The trust is currently trading at a 21% discount to NAV. Investment Positives FLCT's logistics and industrial portfolio forms the cornerstone of its investment appeal, comprising 75.3% of portfolio value with an exceptional occupancy of 99.7%. The portfolio benefits from predominantly freehold and long leasehold assets, providing stable foundations for earnings generation. Rental growth prospects remain strong, with rental reversions reaching 11.9% in 3Q26 on an incoming-versus-outgoing basis and an impressive 23.8% on an average-versus-average basis. This reflects strong rental uplift amid tight market conditions and resilient domestic demand. The portfolio also benefits from built-in rental escalations, including annual increases averaging 3.2% in Australia and CPI-linked leases in Europe, supporting recurring rental income and organic DPU growth. The trust's acquisition capabilities represent a significant growth driver. FLCT has access to a sizeable ROFR pipeline exceeding S$5 billion from sponsor FPL, representing approximately 70% of its existing portfolio value. This provides substantial opportunities for inorganic DPU growth. The trust has demonstrated execution capability through its recent €294.9 million (S$441.5 million) acquisition of four logistics properties in Germany and the Netherlands, expected to be 1.7% DPU accretive. The commercial portfolio offers additional upside potential through backfilling opportunities. ATP is now 85.3% occupied following successful backfilling of approximately 83% of space previously vacated by Google, whilst UK business parks achieved occupancy rates between 81.5% and 87.6%. Further backfilling of remaining vacancies could provide meaningful earnings enhancement. Challenges The research notes that FLCT's commercial portfolio currently operates at an occupancy rate of 88.4%, indicating that vacancy challenges remain and need to be addressed to optimise returns. Outlook The analysts forecast FY26e and FY27e DPU of 5.90 cents and 5.93 cents respectively, translating to attractive forward dividend yields of 6.8%. Potential re-rating catalysts include DPU-accretive acquisitions, divestments of mature non-core assets for capital recycling, and continued commercial portfolio backfilling. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research has initiated coverage with a BUY recommendation and DDM-derived target price of S$1.01. The trust trades at a 21% discount to NAV, representing a level that is 1.4 standard deviations below its historical mean P/NAV. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
JEP Holdings Ltd Positioned for Multi-Year Growth in Semiconductors and Aerospace
Brief Overview Phillip Securities Research has initiated coverage of JEP Holdings Ltd with a positive outlook, highlighting the company's strategic pivot from traditional aerospace manufacturing to specialised semiconductor components. The analyst expects the company to benefit from a new partnership with a major semiconductor customer, continued aerospace recovery, and organic growth through its parent company, UMS Integration. Net profit is projected to almost quadruple from FY25 to FY27e. Investment Positives The most significant growth driver identified is JEP's partnership with a major front-end semiconductor customer to supply specialised plastic components. These components are believed to be used in wet etch, deposition and plating processes of advanced semiconductor packaging for next-generation AI chips. JEP has proactively invested in new capacity ahead of what the analyst expects to be a multi-year ramp, with the company increasing capex spending by more than 2x year-on-year to S$20.6 million in FY25 to expand capabilities in Singapore. Mass production of these specialised plastic components is expected to drive equipment revenue in FY27e up by more than 100% year-on-year to approximately S$50 million. The aerospace segment presents another compelling opportunity, with stronger demand emerging from improved aircraft deliveries. Bottlenecks in aircraft deliveries are easing, and widebody deliveries are expected to increase by 13% CAGR over the next three years. Boeing has increased its 787 Dreamliner production target from 8 to 10 jets monthly by 2026 and expects the first delivery of its 777X widebody jet programme by 2027e. JEP's aerospace revenue rose 37.5% year-on-year to S$15.8 million in 1H26, driven by stronger widebody aircraft deliveries. The company also benefits from its relationship with its parent company UMS Integration, with approximately 30% of JEP's semiconductor metal part orders coming from UMS. The analyst notes that JEP's aerospace-grade machining capabilities can be applied to manufacturing semiconductor parts. In 1H26, semiconductor revenue surged 23% year-on-year to S$8.4 million, driven by AI-led semiconductor capex upcycle. Challenges The report does not explicitly identify significant investment challenges or risks facing JEP Holdings. Outlook The analyst maintains an optimistic outlook, expecting JEP to ride on the organic growth of its parent company UMS Integration. As both UMS and JEP's key semiconductor front-end equipment customers have raised expectations for 2026 WFE spend to approximately US$150 billion (previously US$135-140 billion), this is expected to drive demand for JEP's semiconductor revenue. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research initiates coverage with a BUY recommendation and target price of S$0.83. The target price is based on 28x FY27e P/E, representing a 7% discount to peers' average forward P/E of 30x. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Snowflake Inc – Growth from Rising Coding and AI Agent Activities
Brief Overview Phillip Securities Research highlights that rising enterprise data volumes and AI adoption are accelerating cloud-native platform adoption, with the global data lake market projected to reach US$45.8 billion by 2030. AI products contributed roughly half of 2Q27 growth acceleration, with CoCo and CoWork surpassing 9,100 and 5,800 adopted accounts respectively, helping drive 37% YoY product revenue growth. The firm initiates coverage with a BUY recommendation and DCF-based target price of US$423. Investment Positives The investment case for Snowflake is anchored on several compelling growth drivers. Rising enterprise data volumes and AI adoption are accelerating the shift from on-premises infrastructure to cloud-native data platforms. Enterprises increasingly require scalable, cost-efficient storage and compute capabilities to manage growing datasets and support AI workloads, driving demand for modern data architectures. IBM estimates the global data lake market will reach US$45.8 billion by 2030, representing a 23.9% CAGR from 2024, supporting a sizeable long-term growth opportunity for Snowflake. AI products are proving to be a significant catalyst, contributing roughly half of growth acceleration in 2Q27. This was driven by the rising adoption of CoCo and CoWork, with over 9,100 and 5,800 adopted accounts respectively. Expanding AI coding, agent, and application development workloads helped drive 37% YoY product revenue growth to US$1.5 billion in 2Q27 and contributed to Snowflake's strongest revenue growth in three years. The consumption-based model provides significant leverage to AI adoption. With 95% of revenue being consumption-based, usage is directly linked to revenue. Growing analytics and AI workloads drive higher compute usage, with AI being far more compute-intensive than traditional analytics. Growth is driven by both new customers and higher consumption from existing customers. Customers purchase credits upfront and consume them as workloads run, whilst higher-value products drive greater usage, credit consumption, and spending. Challenges The report does not explicitly outline specific investment challenges or risks facing Snowflake. Outlook The analyst forecasts strong growth momentum, projecting product revenue to grow 36% YoY to US$6.08 billion in FY27e, with adjusted EPS rising 63% YoY and an adjusted FCF margin of 23.8%. The consumption-based revenue model directly links AI-driven compute usage to revenue growth as customers consume more credits and increase spending on higher-value workloads. Recommendation & Target Price Phillip Securities Research initiates coverage with a BUY recommendation and a DCF-based target price of US$423, based on a 5.7% WACC and 5.1% terminal growth rate. Frequently Asked Questions [market_journal_faq] This article has been auto-generated using PhillipGPT. It is based on a report by a Phillip Securities Research analyst. Disclaimer These commentaries are intended for general circulation and do not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. You should seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product(s) mentioned herein, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs, before making a commitment to invest in such products. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of units in any fund and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries. Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
