Tracking Error

Understanding tracking errors is crucial for novice and seasoned investors in investments, particularly in the context of index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Tracking error indicates how closely a fund’s performance aligns with its benchmark index, providing insights into the efficiency and effectiveness of the fund’s management. This detailed guide will analyse the concept of tracking error, its implications, and its significance in investment decision-making. 

What is a Tracking Error? 

Tracking error is the deviation between an investment portfolio’s returns, such as an ETF or index fund, and the returns of its benchmark index. It quantifies how closely the fund’s performance mirrors the index it aims to replicate. Tracking error is typically expressed as a percentage and calculated over a specific period, often annualised. 

Tracking error is an important measure used to assess how effectively a fund mirrors its benchmark. It acts as an indicator of performance volatility, with a higher tracking error suggesting greater fluctuations in the fund’s returns relative to the benchmark, implying that the fund may not consistently follow the index. This metric is especially relevant for passive investment strategies, which aim to replicate the performance of a specific index, whereas actively managed funds often exhibit higher tracking errors due to their varied investment approaches. 

Understanding Tracking Error 

 To fully understand tracking error, it is essential to grasp its role in portfolio management and investment evaluation. Tracking error reflects the active risk taken by a fund manager in attempting to replicate an index’s performance. It is crucial for investors who wish to assess how closely their investments align with market performance. 

Calculation of Tracking Error

 Tracking error can be calculated using two primary methods: 

1. Absolute Tracking Error: This method calculates the difference between the fund’s and benchmark returns over a specified period.

Tracking Error = Standard Deviation (Return_Portfolio – Return_Benchmark) 

2. Standard Deviation of Excess Returns: This method involves calculating the standard deviation of the difference between the fund’s returns and the benchmark’s returns.

Tracking Error = Standard Deviation (Return_Portfolio – Return_Benchmark) 

This second approach provides a more nuanced understanding of how consistently the fund tracks its benchmark over time. 

Types of Tracking Error 

Tracking error can be categorised into several types based on its causes and implications: 

1. Statistical Tracking Error: This refers to the quantitative measure of the deviation of a fund’s returns from its benchmark. It is often expressed as a standard deviation, indicating the variability of the fund’s performance relative to the index.

2. Active Tracking Error: This type measures the performance deviation caused by active management decisions. It reflects the difference between the returns of an actively managed fund and its benchmark.

3. Structural Tracking Error: This arises from the inherent differences in the composition of the fund and the benchmark. For instance, if an ETF cannot hold more than a certain percentage of its assets in a single security due to regulatory constraints, this can lead to tracking error.

Causes of Tracking Error 

Several factors contribute to tracking error, and understanding these causes is essential for investors aiming to minimise discrepancies between fund performance and benchmark returns: 

• Management Fees and Expenses: The costs associated with managing a fund, including management fees, trading costs, and other operational expenses, can lead to tracking error. These costs are deducted from the fund’s returns, causing it to underperform relative to the benchmark. 

• Cash Holdings: Funds often maintain a portion of their assets in cash to meet redemption requests or for other operational needs. This cash drag can result in a tracking error, especially in rising markets where cash does not participate in gains. 

• Timing of Trades: The timing of buying and selling securities can also affect tracking error. If a fund executes trades at different times than the benchmark, it may not capture the same price movements, leading to discrepancies. 

• Market Liquidity: In illiquid markets, the inability to buy or sell securities at desired prices can create tracking errors. Delays in executing trades or the inability to acquire certain securities can impact the fund’s performance. 
• Rebalancing: Funds periodically rebalance their portfolios to align with the benchmark. The timing and method of rebalancing can introduce tracking error, particularly if the fund does not perfectly replicate the index during these adjustments. 

Examples of Tracking Error 

To illustrate the concept of tracking error, consider the following example involving a hypothetical ETF that tracks the S&P 500 index. 

S&P 500 Tracking Error 

An ETF aims to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 index, which consists of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. 

Over a one-year period, the S&P 500 index returns 10%, while the ETF returns 8%. The tracking error can be calculated as follows: 

Difference = Return_{ETF} – Return_ {S&P 500} 

= 8% – 10% = -2% 

If we calculate the standard deviation of the differences between the ETFs and S&P 500’s returns over multiple periods, we might find a standard deviation of 1.5%. Thus, the tracking error would be 1.5%. 

In this case, the ETF has a negative tracking error of 2%, indicating that it underperformed the S&P 500 index. The standard deviation of 1.5% suggests that the ETF’s performance was relatively consistent but still deviated from the benchmark. 

This example highlights how tracking error can provide insights into an ETF’s performance relative to its benchmark, helping investors assess the effectiveness of their investment choices. 

Frequently Asked Questions